| Literature DB >> 32444864 |
Nao Yoshida1, Yoshiyuki Takahashi2, Hiromasa Yabe3, Ryoji Kobayashi4, Kenichiro Watanabe5, Kazuko Kudo6, Miharu Yabe3, Takako Miyamura7, Katsuyoshi Koh8, Hiroshi Kawaguchi9, Hiroaki Goto10, Naoto Fujita11, Keiko Okada12, Yasuhiro Okamoto13, Koji Kato14, Masami Inoue15, Ritsuro Suzuki16, Yoshiko Atsuta17,18, Seiji Kojima2.
Abstract
Fludarabine/cyclophosphamide-based conditioning regimens are standard in bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for acquired bone marrow failure in children, however, graft failure may occur. Using the data from a nationwide transplantation registry, we compared the outcomes of children aged <16 years with acquired aplastic anemia and refractory cytopenia of childhood who underwent allogeneic BMT with either fludarabine/melphalan (n = 71) or fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (n = 296) between 2000 and 2016. The fludarabine/melphalan regimen provided excellent outcomes, with 3-year overall survival and failure-free survival rates of 98% and 97%, respectively. The 83% 3-year failure-free survival in the fludarabine/cyclophosphamide group was significantly inferior (P = 0.002), whereas the overall survival did not differ between the two groups. Late graft failure was the most common cause of treatment failure in the fludarabine/cyclophosphamide group, which experienced a significantly higher incidence of late graft failure than the fludarabine/melphalan group (11% vs. 3%; P = 0.035). Multivariate analyses showed that the fludarabine/melphalan regimen was associated with a better failure-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.12; P = 0.005) and lower risk of late graft failure (HR 0.16; P = 0.037). Fludarabine/melphalan-based conditioning regimen can be a promising option for children with acquired bone marrow failure receiving BMT.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32444864 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-020-0948-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant ISSN: 0268-3369 Impact factor: 5.483