| Literature DB >> 32443917 |
Yuhui Zheng1, Shenglin Xue1, Yanyan Zhao1, Shengli Li1.
Abstract
This study was conducted to investigate the effect of using cassava residue to replace crushed maize on in vitro fermentation characteristics of dairy cows at mid-lactation and provide guidance for its utilization. The study included seven treatments with four replicates, which used 0% (control, CON), 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% and 30% cassava residue to replace crushed maize (air-dried matter basis), respectively. A China-patented automated trace gas recording system was used to perform in vitro gas tests; rumen fluids were collected from three dairy cows at mid-lactation. In vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD), gas production (GP), pH, ammonia-N (NH3-N) and microbial protein (MCP) content were analyzed after in vitro incubating for 3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h, respectively; volatile fatty acid (VFA) content was analyzed after in vitro culturing for 48 h. The results showed that with the increase of substitution ratio of cassava residue, the asymptotic gas production (A) increased quadratically (p < 0.05), cumulative gas production at 48 h (GP48) and the maximum rate of substrate digestion (RmaxS) increased linearly and quadratically (p < 0.05), the time at which the maximum gas production rate is reached (TRmaxG) increases linearly (p < 0.05). In addition, asymptotic gas production in 30% was significantly higher than the other treatments (p < 0.05), RmaxS in 25% and 30% were significantly higher than CON, 5% and 10% (p < 0.05). In addition, with the increase of substitution ratio of cassava residue, when in vitro cultured for 6 h and 12 h, NH3-N content decreased linearly and quadratically (p < 0.05). NH3-N content in 30% was significantly lower than the other treatments except 20% and 25% (p < 0.05) after cultivating for 6 h. Moreover, the content of iso-butyrate, iso-valerate, valerate and total VFA (tVFA) decreased linearly and quadratically (p < 0.05), acetate decreased quadratically (p < 0.05) with the increase of substitution ratio of cassava residue. In conclusion, when the cassava residue substitution ratio for crushed maize was 25% or less, there were no negative effects on in vitro ruminal fermentation characteristics of dairy cows at mid-lactation.Entities:
Keywords: cassava residue; crushed maize; dairy cows at mid-lactation; in vitro gas test; ruminal fermentation characteristics
Year: 2020 PMID: 32443917 PMCID: PMC7278478 DOI: 10.3390/ani10050893
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Nutrient contents of cassava residue and crushed maize (air-dried matter basis, %).
| Items | DM | NDF | ADF | CP | EE | Ca | P | Ash | Starch |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crushed maize | 96.24 | 8.05 | 2.56 | 8.30 | 2.23 | 0.15 | 0.19 | 1.71 | 71.30 |
| Cassava residue | 96.51 | 30.54 | 23.09 | 8.46 | 0.05 | 0.91 | 0.21 | 5.79 | 49.00 |
DM: dry matter; NDF: neutral detergent fiber; ADF: acid detergent fiber; CP: crude protein; EE: ether extract; Ca: calcium; P: phosphorus. All values were analyzed.
Ingredients composition and nutrient content of fermentable substrates in each treatment (air-dried matter basis, %).
| Items | Treatments | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | 30% | |
| Ingredients | |||||||
| Crushed maize | 100.00 | 95.00 | 90.00 | 85.00 | 80.00 | 75.00 | 70.00 |
| Cassava residue | 0.00 | 5.00 | 10.00 | 15.00 | 20.00 | 25.00 | 30.00 |
| Nutrient levels | |||||||
| DM | 96.24 | 96.25 | 96.27 | 96.28 | 96.29 | 96.31 | 96.32 |
| NDF | 8.05 | 9.17 | 10.30 | 11.42 | 12.55 | 13.67 | 14.80 |
| ADF | 2.56 | 3.59 | 4.61 | 5.64 | 6.67 | 7.69 | 8.72 |
| CP | 8.30 | 8.31 | 8.32 | 8.32 | 8.33 | 8.34 | 8.35 |
| EE | 2.23 | 2.12 | 2.01 | 1.90 | 1.80 | 1.69 | 1.58 |
| Ca | 0.15 | 0.19 | 0.23 | 0.26 | 0.30 | 0.34 | 0.38 |
| P | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.20 |
| Ash | 1.71 | 1.91 | 2.12 | 2.32 | 2.53 | 2.73 | 2.93 |
| Starch | 71.30 | 70.19 | 69.07 | 67.96 | 66.84 | 65.73 | 64.61 |
CON (control), 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% and 30%: using 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% and 30% cassava residue to replace crushed maize (air-dried matter basis), respectively; DM: dry matter; NDF: neutral detergent fiber; ADF: acid detergent fiber; CP: crude protein; EE: ether extract; Ca: calcium; P: phosphorus. Values in CON were analyzed and other values were calculated.
Effects of different cassava residue substitution ratio for crushed maize on in vitro IVDMD in dairy cows at mid-lactation (%).
| In Vitro Incubation Time | Treatments | SEM | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | 30% | Treatment | Linear | Quadratic | ||
| 3 h | 39.54 | 39.85 | 37.85 | 37.12 | 40.66 | 40.88 | 40.06 | 0.582 | 0.82 | 0.43 | 0.47 |
| 6 h | 45.68 | 46.36 | 46.48 | 46.60 | 49.12 | 48.65 | 44.77 | 0.598 | 0.79 | 0.68 | 0.38 |
| 12 h | 77.97 | 81.09 | 80.09 | 78.62 | 78.94 | 78.80 | 80.09 | 0.418 | 0.47 | 0.89 | 0.99 |
| 24 h | 89.09 | 89.34 | 89.68 | 87.95 | 86.54 | 89.68 | 86.97 | 0.378 | 0.15 | 0.22 | 0.47 |
| 48 h | 91.32 | 93.01 | 90.55 | 91.85 | 90.58 | 90.57 | 90.91 | 0.526 | 0.56 | 0.32 | 0.61 |
CON (control), 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% and 30%: using 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% and 30% cassava residue to replace crushed maize (air-dried matter basis), respectively; IVDMD: in vitro dry matter digestibility; SEM: standard error of the mean.
Effects of different cassava residue substitution ratio for crushed maize on in vitro gas production and kinetic parameters in dairy cows at mid-lactation.
| Items | Treatments | SEM | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | 30% | Treatment | Linear | Quadratic | ||
| GP48 (mL/g) | 178.25 b | 223.19 a,b | 178.78 b | 227.16 ab | 224.43 a,b | 243.88 a,b | 257.96 a | 7.671 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| A (mL) | 233.99 b,c,d | 267.05 b | 184.12e | 246.64 b,c | 211.51 d,e | 219.88 c,d | 311.27 a | 8.817 | <0.01 | 0.19 | <0.01 |
| B (h) | 1.16 | 1.19 | 1.29 | 1.44 | 1.38 | 1.17 | 1.18 | 0.038 | 0.49 | 0.86 | 0.17 |
| C (h) | 7.13 a | 6.02 b,c | 6.08 b | 5.46 b,c | 5.73 b,c | 5.07 c,d | 4.65 d | 0.170 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| TRmaxG (h) | 0.45 b | 0.79 b | 1.02 a,b | 1.32 a,b | 0.94 a,b | 0.81 b | 1.99 a | 0.117 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.06 |
| RmaxG (h) | 16.27 e | 35.32 a | 20.01 d,e | 32.23 a,b | 25.39 c,d | 35.13 a | 28.48 b,c | 1.577 | <0.01 | 0.06 | 0.09 |
| TRmaxS (h) | 1.13 b | 0.89 b | 1.05 b | 1.14 b | 2.21 a | 1.55 a,b | 1.54 a,b | 0.164 | <0.01 | 0.36 | 0.20 |
| RmaxS (mL/h) | 0.13 c | 0.14 b,c | 0.13 c | 0.17 a | 0.16 a,b | 0.17 a | 0.17 a | 0.005 | 0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
CON (control), 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% and 30%: using 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% and 30% cassava residue to replace crushed maize (air-dried matter basis), respectively; SEM: standard error of the mean; GPt: the cumulative gas production (mL/g DM) at incubation time t (h); A: the asymptotic gas production (mL/g DM); B: a sharpness parameter determining the shape of the curve; C: the time (h) at which half of A is reached and t is in vitro incubation time; TRmaxS: The time at which maximum rate of substrate degradation is reached (h); RmaxS: the maximum rate of substrate digestion (/h); TRmaxG: the time at which RmaxG is reached (h); RmaxG: the maximum gas production rate (mL/h). a,b,c,d,e: within a row with different superscripts differ significantly (p ≤ 0.05).
Effects of different cassava residue substitution ratio for crushed maize on in vitro NH3–N content in dairy cows at mid-lactation (mg/dL) 1.
| In Vitro Incubation Time | Treatments | SEM | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | 30% | Treatment | Linear | Quadratic | ||
| 3 h | 13.35 | 12.19 | 13.23 | 13.07 | 12.62 | 12.35 | 12.10 | 0.248 | 0.78 | 0.29 | 0.54 |
| 6 h | 11.58 a | 11.15 a,b | 10.91 a,b | 10.86 a,b | 9.10 b,c | 10.49 a,b,c | 8.61 c | 0.297 | 0.03 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| 12 h | 7.21 | 6.94 | 5.81 | 6.23 | 5.12 | 5.42 | 6.26 | 0.211 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.02 |
| 24 h | 16.51 | 16.80 | 16.71 | 16.57 | 15.40 | 16.17 | 16.71 | 0.664 | 0.99 | 0.84 | 0.96 |
| 48 h | 39.61 | 45.11 | 40.70 | 46.13 | 41.97 | 46.41 | 45.66 | 1.114 | 0.52 | 0.18 | 0.40 |
1 CON (control), 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% and 30%: using 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% and 30% cassava residue to replace crushed maize (air-dried matter basis), respectively; NH3-N: ammonia-N; SEM: standard error of the mean. a,b,c: within a row with different superscripts differ significantly (p ≤ 0.05).
Effects of different cassava residue substitution ratio for crushed maize on in vitro MCP content in dairy cows at mid-lactation (μg/mL).
| In Vitro Incubation Time | Treatments | SEM | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | 30% | Treatment | Linear | Quadratic | ||
| 3 h | 235.03 | 218.91 | 225.93 | 227.92 | 235.30 | 224.31 | 227.53 | 1.711 | 0.16 | 0.95 | 0.97 |
| 6 h | 248.59 | 245.52 | 246.93 | 250.89 | 248.13 | 250.47 | 245.85 | 1.409 | 0.94 | 0.87 | 0.84 |
| 12 h | 273.72 | 278.41 | 276.46 | 281.76 | 277.56 | 283.17 | 260.06 | 6.500 | 0.98 | 0.75 | 0.72 |
| 24 h | 257.43 | 266.08 | 255.95 | 270.79 | 243.76 | 264.63 | 255.46 | 4.140 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.93 |
| 48 h | 168.74 | 170.15 | 176.97 | 164.63 | 174.53 | 175.90 | 185.34 | 2.282 | 0.36 | 0.10 | 0.16 |
CON (control), 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% and 30%: using 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% and 30% cassava residue to replace crushed maize (air-dried matter basis), respectively; MCP: microbial protein; SEM: standard error of the mean.
Effects of different cassava residue substitution ratio for crushed maize on in vitro pH in dairy cows at mid-lactation.
| In Vitro Incubation Time | Treatments | SEM | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | 30% | Treatment | Linear | Quadratic | ||
| 3 h | 7.44 | 7.43 | 7.43 | 7.43 | 7.40 | 7.42 | 7.42 | 0.006 | 0.56 | 0.16 | 0.27 |
| 6 h | 7.47 | 7.47 | 7.45 | 7.45 | 7.49 | 7.41 | 7.40 | 0.013 | 0.53 | 0.12 | 0.18 |
| 12 h | 7.20 | 7.21 | 7.21 | 7.21 | 7.18 | 7.14 | 7.19 | 0.008 | 0.13 | 0.05 | 0.15 |
| 24 h | 7.10 | 7.13 | 7.13 | 7.13 | 7.15 | 7.14 | 7.14 | 0.008 | 0.81 | 0.15 | 0.26 |
| 48 h | 6.26 b | 6.23 b | 6.29 a,b | 6.29 a,b | 6.27 b | 6.30 a,b | 6.34 a | 0.009 | 0.04 | <0.01 | 0.02 |
CON (control), 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% and 30%: using 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% and 30% cassava residue to replace crushed maize (air-dried matter basis), respectively; SEM: standard error of the mean. a,b: within a row with different superscripts differ significantly (p ≤ 0.05).
Effects of different cassava residue substitution ratio for crushed maize on in vitro VFA concentration after cultivating for 48 h in dairy cows at mid-lactation (mmol/L).
| Items | Treatments | SEM | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | 30% | Treatment | Linear | Quadratic | ||
| Acetate | 1.02 a | 1.06 a | 1.02 a | 1.10 a | 1.01 a,b | 1.08 a | 0.91 b | 0.012 | <0.01 | 0.08 | <0.01 |
| Propionate | 0.41 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.43 | 0.39 | 0.43 | 0.41 | 0.005 | 0.47 | 0.91 | 0.76 |
| Iso-butyrate | 0.52 a | 0.49 a | 0.45 b | 0.46 b | 0.42 b | 0.39 b,c | 0.36 c | 0.014 | 0.02 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| Butyrate | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.82 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.011 | 0.53 | 0.08 | 0.13 |
| Iso-valerate | 0.97 a | 0.88 a,b | 0.89 a,b | 0.91 a,b | 0.86 a,b | 0.81 b,c | 0.75 c | 0.015 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| Valerate | 0.51 a | 0.48 a | 0.49 a | 0.52 a | 0.49 a | 0.43 a,b | 0.41 b | 0.009 | 0.02 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| Acetate/Propionate | 2.53 | 2.50 | 2.47 | 2.56 | 2.65 | 2.38 | 2.32 | 0.033 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 0.24 |
| tVFA | 4.28 a | 4.17 a | 4.05 a,b | 4.19 a | 3.97 a,b | 4.22 a | 3.56 b | 0.049 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
CON (control), 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% and 30%: using 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% and 30% cassava residue to replace crushed maize (air-dried matter basis), respectively; VFA: volatile fatty acids; tVFA: total volatile fatty acids; SEM: standard error of the mean. a,b,c: Means within a row with different superscripts differ significantly (p ≤ 0.05).