Literature DB >> 32443788

Environmental Impact on Differential Composition of Gut Microbiota in Indoor Chickens in Commercial Production and Outdoor, Backyard Chickens.

Zuzana Seidlerova1, Tereza Kubasova1, Marcela Faldynova1, Magdalena Crhanova1, Daniela Karasova1, Vladimir Babak1, Ivan Rychlik1.   

Abstract

In this study, we compared the caecal microbiota composition of egg-laying hens from commercial production that are kept indoors throughout their whole life with microbiota of hens kept outdoors. The microbiota of outdoor hens consisted of lower numbers of bacterial species than the microbiota of indoor hens. At the phylum level, microbiota of outdoor hens was enriched for Bacteroidetes (62.41 ± 4.47% of total microbiota in outdoor hens and 52.01 ± 6.27% in indoor hens) and Proteobacteria (9.33 ± 4.99% in outdoor and 5.47 ± 2.24% in indoor hens). On the other hand, Firmicutes were more abundant in the microbiota of indoor hens (33.28 ± 5.11% in indoor and 20.66 ± 4.41% in outdoor hens). Horizontally transferrable antibiotic resistance genes tetO, tet(32), tet(44), and tetW were also less abundant in the microbiota of outdoor hens than indoor hens. A comparison of the microbiota composition at the genus and species levels pointed toward isolates specifically adapted to the two extreme environments. However, genera and species recorded as being similarly abundant in the microbiota of indoor and outdoor hens are equally as noteworthy because these represent microbiota members that are highly adapted to chickens, irrespective of their genetics, feed composition, and living environment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  backyard chicken; caecum; chicken microbiota; environment; microbiome

Year:  2020        PMID: 32443788     DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8050767

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microorganisms        ISSN: 2076-2607


  4 in total

1.  Host Species Adaptation of Obligate Gut Anaerobes Is Dependent on Their Environmental Survival.

Authors:  Daniela Karasova; Marcela Faldynova; Jitka Matiasovicova; Alena Sebkova; Magdalena Crhanova; Tereza Kubasova; Zuzana Seidlerova; Hana Prikrylova; Jiri Volf; Michal Zeman; Vladimir Babak; Helena Juricova; Jana Rajova; Lenka Vlasatikova; Petr Rysavka; Ivan Rychlik
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-05-25

2.  Cecal Microbiota of Free-Range Hens Varied With Different Rearing Enrichments and Ranging Patterns.

Authors:  Md Saiful Bari; Sarbast K Kheravii; Yadav S Bajagai; Shu-Biao Wu; Chake Keerqin; Dana L M Campbell
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Succession in the caecal microbiota of developing broilers colonised by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Ingrid Cárdenas-Rey; Teresita D J Bello Gonzalez; Jeanet van der Goot; Daniela Ceccarelli; Gerwin Bouwhuis; Danielle Schillemans; Stephanie D Jurburg; Kees T Veldman; J Arjan G M de Visser; Michael S M Brouwer
Journal:  Anim Microbiome       Date:  2022-08-19

Review 4.  Gut microbiota and meat quality.

Authors:  Binlong Chen; Diyan Li; Dong Leng; Hua Kui; Xue Bai; Tao Wang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 6.064

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.