Literature DB >> 32442489

Shared sanitation and the spread of COVID-19: risks and next steps.

Bethany A Caruso1, Matthew C Freeman2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32442489      PMCID: PMC7237180          DOI: 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30086-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Planet Health        ISSN: 2542-5196


× No keyword cloud information.
Directives to self-quarantine and social distance are essential to slow the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), but how can people follow these directives if they do not have a household toilet? Over a billion people need to leave their homes to meet sanitation needs. An estimated 9% (673 million) of the global population defecate in the open and another 8% (627 million) use a facility shared with at least one other household as their primary sanitation location. Sharing of such facilities can be small scale, with a few households, but can also include public, pay-per-use facilities in large informal settlements. The proportion of the global population sharing is only reported for those with improved facilities and is likely underestimated. When used by infected individuals, shared facilities could become sources of both airborne and contact exposures to SARS-CoV-2 exposure, especially in the absence of adequate water and soap for hygiene purposes. Live SARS-CoV-2 has been detected in faeces, and the virus remains viable for days on surfaces like stainless steel and plastic—materials used for doors and other high-contact surfaces in toilets and latrines—making fomite transmission in shared facilities highly plausible. Who might be at risk? An estimated 32% of sanitation in urban sub-Saharan African is shared, the highest proportion globally. Women might be at increased risk due to more frequent use, both for meeting their own needs, including menstruation, and assisting dependent family members. Shared facilities are also used as primary sanitation locations by those detained in migrant centres, incarcerated in jail or prison, residing in refugee or internally displaced person camps, and people who are homeless—ie, already marginalised populations that should not be overlooked. The WHO technical brief on water, sanitation, hygiene and waste management for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) makes no specific mention of shared sanitation, despite wide use, and should be updated with specific guidance. Resources should be mobilised to promote and enable handwashing after use of shared facilities. Physical distancing in queues must be widely encouraged. Cleaning of facilities is important, but this task should not be disproportionately given to women. Research is needed to understand if sanitation contributes to the risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2 and if shared sanitation users start to practice open defecation to avoid potential risks at facilities. Sex-disaggregated data on sanitation use and behaviours among infected individuals is critical. Monitoring efforts should report the proportion of sanitation that is shared, regardless of type, to clarify estimates. Finally, sanitation designs and solutions should be improved on the basis of current lessons from this pandemic to enable sanitation to remain a public health solution, and not a potential threat.
  3 in total

1.  Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Different Types of Clinical Specimens.

Authors:  Wenling Wang; Yanli Xu; Ruqin Gao; Roujian Lu; Kai Han; Guizhen Wu; Wenjie Tan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Understanding and defining sanitation insecurity: women's gendered experiences of urination, defecation and menstruation in rural Odisha, India.

Authors:  Bethany A Caruso; Thomas F Clasen; Craig Hadley; Kathryn M Yount; Regine Haardörfer; Manaswini Rout; Munmun Dasmohapatra; Hannah Lf Cooper
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2017-10-09

3.  Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1.

Authors:  Neeltje van Doremalen; Trenton Bushmaker; Dylan H Morris; Myndi G Holbrook; Amandine Gamble; Brandi N Williamson; Azaibi Tamin; Jennifer L Harcourt; Natalie J Thornburg; Susan I Gerber; James O Lloyd-Smith; Emmie de Wit; Vincent J Munster
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 91.245

  3 in total
  12 in total

Review 1.  Wastewater, waste, and water-based epidemiology (WWW-BE): A novel hypothesis and decision-support tool to unravel COVID-19 in low-income settings?

Authors:  Willis Gwenzi
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  On the emergence of a health-pollutant-climate nexus in the wake of a global pandemic.

Authors:  Renjith VishnuRadhan; Divya David Thresyamma; T I Eldho; Ravinder Dhiman; Sreekanth Giri Bhavan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 5.190

3.  Associating the Change in New COVID-19 Cases to GDP per Capita in 38 European Countries in the First Wave of the Pandemic.

Authors:  Shahina Pardhan; Nick Drydakis
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-01-20

4.  Dangerous liaisons? As the COVID-19 wave hits Africa with potential for novel transmission dynamics: a perspective.

Authors:  Willis Gwenzi
Journal:  Z Gesundh Wiss       Date:  2021-01-02

5.  The preliminary evaluation of differential characteristics and factor evaluation of the microbial structure of rural household toilet excrement in China.

Authors:  Yi Gao; Houyu Li; Bo Yang; Xiaocheng Wei; Chunxue Zhang; Yan Xu; Xiangqun Zheng
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Enlightenment from the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Roles of Environmental Factors in Future Public Health Emergency Response.

Authors:  Xiaolei Wang; Fengchang Wu; Xiaoli Zhao; Xiao Zhang; Junyu Wang; Lin Niu; Weigang Liang; Kenneth Mei Yee Leung; John P Giesy
Journal:  Engineering (Beijing)       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 7.553

Review 7.  Leaving no stone unturned in light of the COVID-19 faecal-oral hypothesis? A water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) perspective targeting low-income countries.

Authors:  Willis Gwenzi
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Environmental health practitioners: a key cadre in the control of COVID-19 in sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Tracy Morse; Kondwani Chidziwisano; David Musoke; Tara K Beattie; Selva Mudaly
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2020-07

Review 9.  Shedding of SARS-CoV-2 in feces and urine and its potential role in person-to-person transmission and the environment-based spread of COVID-19.

Authors:  David L Jones; Marcos Quintela Baluja; David W Graham; Alexander Corbishley; James E McDonald; Shelagh K Malham; Luke S Hillary; Thomas R Connor; William H Gaze; Ines B Moura; Mark H Wilcox; Kata Farkas
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  A Novel Predictor for Micro-Scale COVID-19 Risk Modeling: An Empirical Study from a Spatiotemporal Perspective.

Authors:  Sui Zhang; Minghao Wang; Zhao Yang; Baolei Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.