| Literature DB >> 32442216 |
Elaine A Yu1, Julia L Finkelstein1, Patsy M Brannon1, Wesley Bonam2, David G Russell3, Marshall J Glesby4, Saurabh Mehta1,5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Our study goal was to evaluate a set of nutritional indicators among adults with confirmed or suspected active tuberculosis disease in southern India, given the limited literature on this topic. Study objectives were to assess the: I) double burden of malnutrition at individual and population levels; II) relative performance of anthropometric indicators (body mass index, waist circumference) in diabetes screening; and III) associations between vitamin D and metabolic abnormalities.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32442216 PMCID: PMC7244113 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233306
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of study participants .
| Total n = 834 | Men n = 610 (73.1%) | Women n = 224 (26.9%) | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years), median (IQR) | 48 (35, 60) | 51 (37, 64) | 40 (30, 53) | <0.01 |
| Education (completed level/class), n (%) | ||||
| Illiterate | 404 (48.4%) | 272 (44.6%) | 132 (58.9%) | 0.03 |
| Primary | 209 (25.1%) | 183 (30.0%) | 26 (11.6%) | |
| Secondary, middle | 152 (18.2%) | 103 (16.9%) | 49 (21.9%) | |
| Graduate, diploma, post-graduate | 69 (8.3%) | 52 (8.5%) | 17 (7.6%) | |
| Monthly household income < 5000 INR, n (%) | 354 (54.0%) | 231 (50.7%) | 123 (61.5%) | 0.01 |
| Self-reported current cigarette smoking, n (%) | 41 (4.9%) | 41 (6.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | — |
| Active TB disease, n (%) | 88 (24.2%) | 80 (27.7%) | 8 (10.8%) | <0.01 |
| Coughing, n (%) | 693 (85.9%) | 516 (87.9%) | 177 (80.5%) | 0.01 |
| With sputum production | 511 (74.2%) | 394 (77.0%) | 117 (66.1%) | 0.01 |
| With blood | 72 (10.5%) | 59 (11.6%) | 13 (7.4%) | 0.11 |
| Fever, n (%) | 331 (41.2%) | 246 (42.1%) | 85 (39.0%) | 0.43 |
| Night sweats, n (%) | 127 (15.7%) | 91 (15.5%) | 36 (16.4%) | 0.76 |
AFB, acid-fast bacilli; IDF, International Diabetes Federation; INR, Indian rupees; TB, tuberculosis; WHO, World Health Organization
a Among study participants with available hemoglobin, age, and sex data (n = 834). Covariates with missing observations included: monthly household income (n = 178), cigarette smoking (n = 2), active TB disease assessment (n = 471), coughing (n = 27), sputum production with cough (n = 145), blood with cough (n = 151), fever (n = 31), night sweats (n = 26).
b Comparison of each sociodemographic or clinical indicator between men and women
c Hodges Lehmann estimator (two-sided normal approximation based on Wilcoxon sign rank test).
d Likelihood ratio test
e Kruskal Wallis test. Normality assumptions not met based on Shapiro-Wilk test statistic.
f Sample cell size < 5
g Including completed and some primary education
h Cut-off value of 5000 INR rounded from the cut-off of 4860 INR, which is based on monthly consumption expenditure for a family of five residing in a rural area (2011–12 prices), per the India national poverty line (Government of India, Planning Commission, 2014 Report) [25]
i Based on AFB sputum smear microscopy.
j According to self-report
k Among those with cough
Anthropometry among adults with suspected or confirmed active TB disease .
| Total n = 834 | Men n = 610 (73.1%) | Women n = 224 (26.9%) | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMI (kg/m2), median (IQR) | 18.8 (16.8, 22.2) | 18.6 (16.8, 21.5) | 19.6 (16.9, 23.8) | <0.01 | |
| <18.5 | 357 (45.0%) | 271 (46.8%) | 86 (40.2%) | < 0.01 | |
| ≥ 18.5 to < 25.0 | 342 (43.1%) | 256 (44.2%) | 86 (40.2%) | ||
| ≥ 25.0 to < 30.0 | 72 (9.1%) | 45 (7.8%) | 27 (12.6%) | ||
| ≥ 30.0 | 22 (2.8%) | 7 (1.2%) | 15 (7.0%) | ||
| <18.5 | 357 (45.0%) | 271 (46.8%) | 86 (40.2%) | < 0.01 | |
| ≥ 18.5 to < 23.0 | 272 (34.3%) | 210 (36.3%) | 62 (29.0%) | ||
| ≥ 23.0 to < 27.5 | 121 (15.3%) | 82 (14.2%) | 39 (18.2%) | ||
| ≥ 27.5 | 43 (5.4%) | 16 (2.8%) | 27 (12.6%) | ||
| WC (cm), median (IQR) | 69.5 (63.4, 79.6) | 70.3 (65.0, 80.1) | 66.9 (60.7, 77.5) | <0.01 | |
| < IDF cut-off, n (%) | 700 (87.5%) | 536 (90.7%) | 164 (78.5%) | < 0.01 | |
BMI, body mass index; IDF, International Diabetes Federation; WC, waist circumference; WHO, World Health Organization
a Among study participants with available hemoglobin, age, and sex data (n = 834). Covariates with missing observations included: BMI (n = 41), WC (n = 34).
b Comparison of each anthropometric indicator between men and women
c Likelihood ratio test
d Kruskal Wallis test. Normality assumptions not met based on Shapiro-Wilk test statistic.
e IDF WC cut-off values among South Asian populations (men <80 cm, women <90 cm)
Biochemical indicators of study participants .
| Total n = 834 | Men n = 610 (73.1%) | Women n = 224 (26.9%) | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hemoglobin (g/L) | 115.0 (99.0, 129.7) | 120.0 (103.0, 132.7) | 102.0 (90.0, 115.0) | <0.01 |
| Anemia | 600 (71.9%) | 416 (68.2%) | 184 (82.1%) | <0.01 |
| Severe anemia | 53 (6.4%) | 32 (5.3%) | 21 (9.4%) | 0.04 |
| Hypochromic microcytic anemia | 175 (23.0%) | 108 (19.2%) | 67 (34.2%) | <0.01 |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.4 (5.0, 5.8) | 5.4 (5.1, 5.8) | 5.3 (4.9, 5.7) | 0.07 |
| ≥ 6.5% | 29 (12.3%) | 21 (13.0%) | 8 (10.7%) | 0.20 |
| < 6.5% and ≥ 5.7% | 48 (20.3%) | 36 (22.4%) | 12 (16.0%) | |
| < 5.7% | 159 (67.4%) | 104 (64.6%) | 55 (73.3%) | |
| 25(OH)D (nmol/L) | 51.8 (36.0, 70.0) | 55.2 (38.8, 75.0) | 48.4 (31.7, 64.2) | 0.04 |
| <25 | 17 (10.9%) | 10 (10.0%) | 7 (12.5%) | 0.64 |
| < 40 | 49 (31.4%) | 26 (26.0%) | 23 (41.1%) | 0.05 |
| <50 | 73 (46.8%) | 43 (43.0%) | 30 (53.6%) | 0.20 |
| <75 | 126 (80.8%) | 75 (75.0%) | 51 (91.1%) | 0.01 |
| ESR (mm/hr) | 30 (15, 55) | 30 (12, 60) | 25 (15, 45) | 0.31 |
| Elevated ESR | 492 (59.0%) | 375 (61.5%) | 117 (52.2%) | 0.02 |
| White blood cell count (cells/cmm) | 9,500 (7,740, 12,300) | 9,700 (7,900, 12,380) | 9,200 (7,300, 12,100) | 0.03 |
| Elevated WBC (>11,000) | 274 (34.4%) | 213 (36.4%) | 61 (28.9%) | 0.05 |
| Differential count (%) | ||||
| Neutrophils | 68 (60, 76) | 70.0 (61.0, 77.0) | 64.0 (57.0, 72.5) | <0.01 |
| Lymphocytes | 23 (16, 31) | 22 (15, 30) | 27.5 (20.0, 34.0) | <0.01 |
| Monocytes | 4 (3, 5) | 4 (3, 5) | 4 (3, 5) | 0.73 |
| Eosinophils | 4 (3, 5) | 4 (3, 5) | 4 (3, 5) | 0.56 |
25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; IQR, interquartile range; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; WBC, white blood cells
a Among study participants with available anemia (hemoglobin) data (n = 834); of this total, covariates with missing observations included: hypochromic microcytic anemia (74 missing observations), white blood cell count (38 missing observations), lymphocytes (1 missing observation). Two sub-analyses were among sample subsets with 25(OH)D (n = 156) and HbA1c (n = 236) data.
b Comparison of each biochemical indicator by biological sex
c Hemoglobin adjusted for smoking, based on WHO recommendations. 0.3 g/L hemoglobin was subtracted among any individuals who self-reported as currently smoking [15].
d See definitions in S1 Table
e Among those with anemia and available data for hypochromia and microcytosis
f Scientific Advisory Council of Nutrition cut-off value recommended to prevent rickets
g Institute of Medicine cut-off values for 25(OH)D deficiency and insufficiency among healthy populations
h Endocrine Society cut-off values for 25(OH)D deficiency and insufficiency among populations at risk of vitamin D deficiency
i Hodges Lehmann estimator (two-sided normal approximation based on Wilcoxon sign rank test). Normality assumptions not met based on Shapiro-Wilk test statistic.
j Likelihood ratio test
Double burden of malnutrition (n = 217).
| Y | N | ||
| Y | 75 (34.6%) | 16 (7.4%) | |
| N | 108 (49.8%) | 18 (8.3%) | |
BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; IDF, International Diabetes Federation; MUAC, mid-upper arm circumference
a Includes any assessed indicator of undernutrition (BMI <18.5 kg/m2, anemia, or low MUAC)
b Includes any assessed indicator of overnutrition (BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m2, or WC ≥ IDF cutoff) or diet-related non-communicable disease (HbA1c ≥ 5.7%)
c Based on available data for all variables considered (BMI, WC, MUAC, hemoglobin, HbA1c). A complete case analysis approach was utilized. If any of these variables were missing, the observation was considered missing.
Comparison of anthropometric (BMI, WC) screening cut-offs for HbA1c ≥ 6.5% , .
| HbA1c | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMI | ≥6.5% | <6.5% | Sensitivity (95% CI) | Specificity (95% CI) | PPV (95% CI) | NPV (95% CI) | |
| ≥ 25.0 | 6 | 16 | 22 | ||||
| < 25.0 | 23 | 178 | 201 | 0.21 (0.06, 0.35) | 0.92 (0.88, 0.96) | 0.27 (0.09, 0.46) | 0.89 (0.84, 0.93) |
| 29 | 194 | 223 | |||||
| ≥ 23.0 | 9 | 29 | 38 | ||||
| < 23.0 | 20 | 165 | 185 | 0.31 (0.14, 0.48) | 0.85 (0.80, 0.90) | 0.24 (0.10, 0.37) | 0.890.85, 0.94) |
| 29 | 194 | 223 | |||||
| WC | |||||||
| ≥ IDF cut-off | 8 | 24 | 32 | ||||
| < IDF cut-off | 20 | 177 | 197 | 0.29 (0.12, 0.45) | 0.88 (0.84, 0.93) | 0.25 (0.10, 0.40) | 0.90 (0.86, 0.94) |
| 28 | 201 | 229 | |||||
BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; CI, confidence interval; IDF, International Diabetes Federation; WHO, World Health Organization
a Among study participants with available data (hemoglobin, HbA1c, as well as either BMI [categorical; n = 223] or WC [n = 229]).
b American Diabetes Association cut-points of HbA1c ≥ 6.5%.
c WHO classifications (standard and alternative categorization for Asian populations)
d IDF WC cut-off values among South Asian populations (men ≥80 cm, women ≥90 cm)
Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and glycated hemoglobin (n = 149).
| Vitamin D (25[OH]D) | HbA1c (continuous; linear regression) | HbA1c (categorical ≥ 6.5%; binomial regression) | HbA1c (categorical ≥ 5.7%; binomial regression) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unadjusted | Adjusted | Unadjusted | Adjusted | Unadjusted | Adjusted | |||||||
| β (SE) | p | β (SE) | p | RR | 95% CI | RR | 95% CI | RR | 95% CI | RR | 95% CI | |
| Continuous (nmol/L) | <-0.01 (<0.01) | 0.48 | <-0.01 (<0.01) | 0.27 | 1.00 | 0.98, 1.01 | 0.99 | 0.97, 1.01 | 0.99 | 0.98, 1.01 | 0.99 | 0.98, 1.00 |
| < 50 nmol/L (Endocrine Society) | 0.40 (0.27) | 0.13 | 0.54 (0.27) | 0.04 | 1.57 | 0.63, 3.90 | 1.80 | 0.67, 4.84 | 1.36 | 0.84, 2.19 | 1.54 | 0.98, 2.41 |
| Quintiles (low 1 vs 2–5) | 0.09 (0.33) | 0.79 | 0.21 (0.33) | 0.52 | 0.82 | 0.25, 2.66 | 0.92 | 0.26, 3.34 | 1.46 | 0.88, 2.40 | 1.61 | 1.02, 2.56 |
a HbA1c cut-offs based on WHO and IDF recommendations
b We considered known or suspected risk factors for HbA1c as potential confounders. These potential confounders were included if p<0.25 from univariate regressions (linear or binomial regression model beta coefficients; likelihood ratio tests). Based on a change in estimate approach, covariates were included in the final adjusted model if they changed the estimate by ≥10%. The final covariates for the association of HbA1c (categorical, ≥5.7%) and vitamin D (quintiles 1 vs 2–5) were utilized in final models in this table; these included: age, trunk fat. Analysis among participants with available HbA1c and vitamin D data (n = 149). Missing-data indicators were used for covariates with missingness.
c Binomial regression unless otherwise stated
d Poisson regression due to no model convergence