Literature DB >> 32441746

The dawn of the future: 30 years from the first biopsy of a human embryo. The detailed history of an ongoing revolution.

Danilo Cimadomo1, Laura Rienzi1, Antonio Capalbo2,3, Carmen Rubio4, Federica Innocenti1, Carmen María García-Pascual4, Filippo Maria Ubaldi1, Alan Handyside5.   

Abstract

Following early studies showing no adverse effects, cleavage stage biopsy by zona drilling using acid Tyrode's solution, and removal of single blastomeres for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) and identification of sex in couples at risk of X-linked disease, was performed by Handyside and colleagues in late 1989, and pregnancies reported in 1990. This method was later used for specific diagnosis of monogenic conditions, and a few years later also for chromosomal structural and/or numerical impairments, thereby establishing a valuable alternative option to prenatal diagnosis. This revolutionary approach in clinical embryology spread worldwide, and several other embryo biopsy strategies developed over three decades in a process that is still ongoing. The rationale of this narrative review is to outline the different biopsy approaches implemented across the years in the workflow of the IVF clinics that provided PGT: their establishment, the first clinical experiences, their downsides, evolution, improvement and standardization. The history ends with a glimpse of the future: minimally/non-invasive PGT and experimental embryo micromanipulation protocols. This grand theme review outlines a timeline of the evolution of embryo biopsy protocols, whose implementation is increasing worldwide together with the increasing application of PGT techniques in IVF. It represents a vade mecum especially for the past, present and upcoming operators and experts in this field to (re)live this history from its dawn to its most likely future.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permission@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IVF; blastocyst; blastomere biopsy; embryo; history of PGT; micromanipulation; oocyte; polar body biopsy; preimplantation genetic testing; trophectoderm biopsy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32441746     DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmaa019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod Update        ISSN: 1355-4786            Impact factor:   15.610


  13 in total

1.  When embryology meets genetics: the definition of developmentally incompetent preimplantation embryos (DIPE)-the consensus of two Italian scientific societies.

Authors:  Danilo Cimadomo; Antonio Capalbo; Catello Scarica; Laura Sosa Fernandez; Laura Rienzi; Rosanna Ciriminna; Maria Giulia Minasi; Antonio Novelli; Lucia De Santis; Daniela Zuccarello
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Trophectoderm Biopsy Differentially Influences the Level of Serum β-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin With Different Embryonic Trophectoderm Scores in Early Pregnancy From 7847 Single-Blastocyst Transfer Cycles.

Authors:  Yuan Li; Quan Wen; Jingnan Liao; Shujuan Ma; Shuoping Zhang; Yifan Gu; Yi Tang; Keli Luo; Xiaoyi Yang; Guang-Xiu Lu; Ge Lin; Fei Gong
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 3.  Evolution and Utility of Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Monogenic Disorders in Assisted Reproduction - A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Firuza R Parikh; Arundhati S Athalye; Dhananjaya K Kulkarni; Rupesh R Sanap; Suresh B Dhumal; Dhanashree J Warang; Dattatray J Naik; Prochi F Madon
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-12-31

4.  Non-Assisted Hatching Trophectoderm Biopsy Does Not Increase The Risks of Most Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcome and May Be More Practical for Busy Clinics: Evidence From China.

Authors:  Shuo Li; Shuiying Ma; Jialin Zhao; Jingmei Hu; Hongchang Li; Yueting Zhu; Wenjie Jiang; Linlin Cui; Junhao Yan; Zi-Jiang Chen
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 5.555

5.  The second polar body contributes to the fate asymmetry in the mouse embryo.

Authors:  Hongbin Jin; Yang Han; Huasong Wang; J Xiao He Li; Weimin Shen; Lin Zhang; Luxi Chen; Shunji Jia; Ping Yuan; Hui Chen; Anming Meng
Journal:  Natl Sci Rev       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 23.178

6.  A comprehensive and universal approach for embryo testing in patients with different genetic disorders.

Authors:  Shuo Zhang; Caixia Lei; Junping Wu; Min Xiao; Jing Zhou; Saijuan Zhu; Jing Fu; Daru Lu; Xiaoxi Sun; Congjian Xu
Journal:  Clin Transl Med       Date:  2021-07

7.  Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (abnormal number of chromosomes) in in vitro fertilisation.

Authors:  Simone Cornelisse; Miriam Zagers; Elena Kostova; Kathrin Fleischer; Madelon van Wely; Sebastiaan Mastenbroek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-09-08

Review 8.  Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Chromosomal Abnormalities: Aneuploidy, Mosaicism, and Structural Rearrangements.

Authors:  Manuel Viotti
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 9.  Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Monogenic Disorders.

Authors:  Martine De Rycke; Veerle Berckmoes
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  Does the cell number of 0PN embryos on day 3 affect pregnancy and neonatal outcomes following single blastocyst transfer?

Authors:  Chen Chen; Wenzhi Li; Mingru Yin; Menghui Li; Ling Wu; Jiqiang Si; Leiwen Zhao; Bin Li; Zheng Yan; Qifeng Lyu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.