Literature DB >> 32441653

MRI in the evaluation of the azoospermic male.

Bartosz Regent1, Katarzyna Skrobisz1, Oliwia Kozak1, Marcin Matuszewski1, Michał Studniarek2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE We aimed to show the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of infertile men and its ability to distinguish obstructive from nonobstructive azoospermia. METHODS Between April 2015 and February 2018, 45 azoospermic men underwent scrotal MRI. We evaluated the images with an emphasis on signal characteristics of the testis and morphologic changes typical for obstruction. Testicular volume (TV), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value, T1 and T2 signal ratios (testis/muscle) were measured for every testis. On the basis of histologic results, patients were divided into two groups: obstructive azoospermia (OA) and nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA). RESULTS Testes of patients in the OA group had significantly lower ADC values (mean 0.876±101 ×10-3 mm2/s) than in the NOA group (mean, 1.114±147 ×10-3 mm2/s). TV was significantly higher in patients with OA (median, 17.61 mL; range, 11.1-38.4 mL) than in those with NOA (median, 10.5 mL; range, 5.2-22.2 mL). ROC analysis showed that both TV and ADC values were highly predictive for distinguishing between OA and NOA patients, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.82 and 0.92 respectively. A cutoff value of ≥12.4 mL could distinguish obstructive from nonobstructive azoospermia with a sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 63%, whereas for ADC measurements a cutoff value of ≥0.952 ×10-3 mm2/s exhibited a sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 90% There was no statistically significant difference in T1 and T2 signal ratios between both groups. Abnormalities typical for obstruction of the male reproductive tract (e.g., dilatation of ejaculatory ducts, prostatic or seminal vesicle cysts) were found in 78% of patients (14/18) in the obstructive group. CONCLUSION Scrotal MRI is a very effective tool for the evaluation of azoospermic men and may provide important information facilitating interventional treatment of infertility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32441653      PMCID: PMC7360073          DOI: 10.5152/dir.2019.19189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1305-3825            Impact factor:   2.630


  28 in total

1.  Transrectal US and endorectal MR imaging in partial and complete obstruction of the seminal duct system. A comparative study.

Authors:  G Engin; A Kadioğlu; I Orhan; S Akdöl; I Rozanes
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.990

Review 2.  MRI of the scrotum: Recommendations of the ESUR Scrotal and Penile Imaging Working Group.

Authors:  Athina C Tsili; Michele Bertolotto; Ahmet Tuncay Turgut; Vikram Dogra; Simon Freeman; Laurence Rocher; Jane Belfield; Michal Studniarek; Alexandra Ntorkou; Lorenzo E Derchi; Raymond Oyen; Parvati Ramchandani; Mustafa Secil; Jonathan Richenberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Imaging in male-factor obstructive infertility.

Authors:  Ragab H Donkol
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-05-28

4.  Bilateral histological evaluation of exocrine testicular function in men with obstructive azoospermia: condition of spermatogenesis and andrological implications?

Authors:  Gerald Pühse; Jörg Hense; Martin Bergmann; Sabine Kliesch
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 5.  Male infertility: the role of imaging in diagnosis and management.

Authors:  T Ammar; P S Sidhu; C J Wilkins
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Differential diagnosis of azoospermia and etiologic classification of obstructive azoospermia: role of scrotal and transrectal US.

Authors:  Jing Du; Feng Hua Li; Yi Fen Guo; Li Ming Yang; Ju Fen Zheng; Bin Chen; Jian Shan Zhu; Qiang Liu
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography in predicting etiology of azoospermia.

Authors:  Saad R Abdulwahed; Essam-Eldeen M Mohamed; Emad A Taha; Medhat A Saleh; Yaser M Abdelsalam; Ehab O ElGanainy
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Advantages of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the seminal vesicles and intra-abdominal vas deferens in patients with congenital absence of the vas deferens.

Authors:  Han-Sun Chiang; Yi-Hsiang Lin; Yi-No Wu; Chien-Chih Wu; Ming-Che Liu; Chih-Ming Lin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  The performance of transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis of seminal vesicle defects: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Xu Chen; Hua Wang; Rong-Pei Wu; Hui Liang; Xiao-Peng Mao; Cheng-Qiang Mao; Hong-Zhang Zhu; Shao-Peng Qiu; Dao-Hu Wang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

10.  Factors influencing sperm retrieval following testicular sperm extraction in nonobstructive azoospermia patients.

Authors:  Peyman Salehi; Marzieh Derakhshan-Horeh; Zakiye Nadeali; Majid Hosseinzadeh; Erfan Sadeghi; Mohammad Hossein Izadpanahi; Mansour Salehi
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2017-03-31
View more
  3 in total

1.  Complex Chromosomal Rearrangement Causes Male Azoospermia: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Yi Liang; Yingjun Xie; Shu Kong; Qianying Pan; Wenjun Qiu; Ding Wang; Mengting Li; Sisi Lin; Zihang Liu; Xiaofang Sun
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 2.  When to ask for an MRI of the scrotum.

Authors:  Athina C Tsili; Maria I Argyropoulou; Miriam Dolciami; Giada Ercolani; Carlo Catalano; Lucia Manganaro
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.842

3.  Testicular volume in infertile versus fertile white-European men: a case-control investigation in the real-life setting.

Authors:  Luca Boeri; Paolo Capogrosso; Eugenio Ventimiglia; Walter Cazzaniga; Edoardo Pozzi; Federico Belladelli; Filippo Pederzoli; Massimo Alfano; Costantino Abbate; Emanuele Montanari; Luca Valsecchi; Enrico Papaleo; Paola Viganò; Patrizia Rovere-Querini; Suks Minhas; Francesco Montorsi; Andrea Salonia
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2021 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.285

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.