| Literature DB >> 32441493 |
Catherine J Leader1, Darren J Kelly2, Ivan A Sammut3, Gerard T Wilkins1, Robert J Walker1.
Abstract
Hypertension plays an important role in the development and progression of chronic kidney disease. Studies to date, with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), have demonstrated varying degrees of results in modifying the development of renal fibrosis. This study aimed to investigate whether treatment with a MRA commenced following the establishment of hypertension, a situation more accurately representing the clinical setting, modified the progression of renal fibrosis. Using male Cyp1a1Ren2 rats (n = 28), hypertension was established by addition of 0.167% indole-3-carbinol (w/w) to the rat chow, for 2 weeks prior to treatment. Rats were then divided into normotensive, hypertensive (H), or hypertensive with daily oral spironolactone treatment (H + SP) (human equivalent dose 50 mg/day). Physiological data and tissue were collected after 4 and 12 weeks for analysis. After 4 weeks, spironolactone had no demonstrable effect on systolic blood pressure (SBP), proteinuria, or macrophage infiltration in the renal cortex. However, glomerulosclerosis and renal cortical fibrosis were significantly decreased. Following 12 weeks of spironolactone treatment, SBP was lowered (not back to normotensive levels), proteinuria was reduced, and the progression of glomerulosclerosis and renal cortical fibrosis was significantly blunted. This was associated with a significant reduction in macrophage and myofibroblast infiltration, as well as CTGF and pSMAD2 expression. In summary, in a model of established hypertension, spironolactone significantly blunted the progression of renal fibrosis and glomerulosclerosis, and downregulated the renal inflammatory response, which was associated with reduced proteinuria, despite only a partial reduction in systolic blood pressure. This suggests a blood pressure independent effect of MRA on renal fibrosis.Entities:
Keywords: fibrosis; hypertension; kidney; spironolactone
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32441493 PMCID: PMC7243196 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.14448
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
FIGURE 1Experimental timeline overview. Hypertension was induced at 8 weeks of age, by addition of indole‐3‐carbinol (I3C) and given 2 weeks to establish before animals were assigned to one of the four experimental groups (Day 0). In addition, one group was maintained on normal chow as a normotensive control. On day 1, daily dosing of spironolactone began in the two treatment groups. After a further 4 weeks, physiological data was collected (urine and systolic blood pressure) from groups 1 and 2 before termination and tissue harvest. The remaining groups (3 and 4) were treated similarly after 12 weeks
Physiological data from repeated measurements of normotensive (N; n = 8), hypertensive (H; n = 8), and hypertensive rats dosed daily with spironolactone (H + SP; n = 4) for 3 months
|
| H | H + SP | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBP (mmHg) | Baseline (day 0) | 96 ± 12 [92–100] | 143 ± 21*** [139–148] | 141 ± 11*** [137–145] |
| 4 weeks | 94 ± 7 [92–96] | 172 ± 14*** [169–175] | 181 ± 23*** [172–190] | |
| 12 weeks | 91 ± 13 [88–95] | 196 ± 21*** ‡‡‡ [191–201] | 184 ± 15*** †† [179–189] | |
| Urine Na:K ratio | 4 weeks | 0.41 ± 0.1 [0.31–0.5] | 0.68 ± 0.16 ** [0.54–0.81] | 0.81 ± 0.03 *** [0.76–0.86] |
| 12 weeks | 0.38 ± 0.1 [0.3–0.46] | 0.64 ± 0.16** [0.5–0.77] | 0.37 ± 0.07† ‡‡‡ [0.26–0.48] | |
| Urine protein: creatinine ratio | 4 weeks | 5.4 ± 0.3 [5.2–5.7] | 15 ± 2.4*** [12.7–17.2] | 16.9 ± 3.6*** [11.2–22.5] |
| 12 weeks | 5.4 ± 0.3 [5.2–5.6] | 20.7 ± 4***‡ [17–24.4] | 12.6 ± 2 | |
| Plasma creatinine (µmol/L) | 4 weeks | 102 ± 23 [81–123] | 78 ± 21 [52–105] | |
| 12 weeks | 83 ± 13 [71–95] | 173 ± 31*** [148–197] | 154 ± 18*** [135–174] |
Within each group, measurements at each time frame were taken from the same individual animals over the 3 months (with the exception of plasma creatinine). Values are shown as mean ± SD, with 95% confidence intervals shown in brackets.
One‐way ANOVA with post hoc Bonferroni multiple comparison.
Indicates significant difference from N. * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001.
Indicates significant difference between H and H + SP. † p < .05, †† p < .01, ††† p < .001.
Indicates significance difference between 4 weeks and 12 weeks. ‡ p < .05, ‡‡‡ p < .001.
FIGURE 2Cortical renal fibrotic changes in hypertensive (H) and hypertensive animals treated with daily oral spironolactone (H + SP) following 4 or 12 weeks compared to normotensive (N) animals. Periodic‐acid Schiff (PAS, scale bar is 50 µm) used to assess glomerulosclerosis. Interstitial cortical fibrosis is shown with picrosirius red (SR, scale bar 100 µm). Below: Histograms show quantification of each stain. Significant difference between N and H is indicated by * (*p < .05, ***p < .001). Significant difference between H and H + SP is indicated by # (# p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001)
FIGURE 3Correlation between systolic blood pressure and renal cortical fibrosis in all groups (normotensive control animals (closed circles), hypertensive animals (open circles), and hypertensive animals dosed with spironolactone (half shaded circles)) after 12 weeks. The R‐squared value and significance (p value) is shown on the graph
FIGURE 4Correlation between glomerulosclerosis (GSI) and proteinuria (expressed as protein: creatinine ratio) in all groups (normotensive control animals (closed circles), hypertensive animals (open circles), and hypertensive animals dosed with spironolactone (half shaded circles)) after 12 weeks. The R‐squared value and significance (p value) is shown on the graph
FIGURE 5Immunohistochemical renal fibrotic changes in hypertensive (H) and hypertensive animals treated with daily oral spironolactone (H + SP) following 4 or 12 weeks when compared to normotensive (N) animals. Immunohistochemical stains showing expression of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), alpha smooth muscle actin (αSMA), and phosphorylated SMAD2 (pSMAD2). Macrophage infiltration is shown by positive expression of CD68 (indicated by arrows). Positive expression of each antibody is shown by brown stain. Scale bars 50 µm. Below: Histograms show quantification of each antibody. Significant difference between N and H is indicated by * (*p < .05, ***p < .001). Significant difference between H and H + SP is indicated by # (# p < .05, ## p < .01, ### p < .001)