| Literature DB >> 32441187 |
Andrew J Vickers1, Melissa J Assel1, Daniel D Sjoberg1, Rui Qin2, Zhiguo Zhao3, Tatsuki Koyama3, Albert Botchway4, Xuemei Wang5, Dezheng Huo6, Michael Kattan7, Emily C Zabor7, Frank Harrell3.
Abstract
In an effort to improve the presentation of and information within tables and figures in clinical urology research, we propose a set of appropriate guidelines. We introduce six principles: (1) include graphs only if they improve the reader's ability to understand the study findings; (2) think through how a graph might best convey information, do not just select a graph from preselected options on statistical software; (3) do not use graphs to replace reporting key numbers in the text of a paper; (4) graphs should give an immediate visual impression of the data; (5) make it beautiful; and (6) make the labels and legend clear and complete. We present a list of quick "dos and don'ts" for both tables and figures. Investigators should feel free to break any of the guidelines if it would result in a beautiful figure or a clear table that communicates data effectively. That said, we believe that the quality of tables and figures in the medical literature would improve if these guidelines were to be followed. Patient summary: A set of guidelines were developed for presenting figures and tables in urology research. The guidelines were developed by a broad group of statistical experts with special interest in urology.Entities:
Keywords: figures; guidelines; reporting guidelines; tables
Year: 2020 PMID: 32441187 DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001096
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Urol ISSN: 0022-5347 Impact factor: 7.450