Literature DB >> 32440851

Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy with Jejunal Interposition for Early Proximal Gastric Cancer.

Lam Viet Trung1,2, Nguyen Vo Vinh Loc1,2, Tran Phung Dung Tien1,2, Nguyen Lam Vuong3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Proximal gastrectomy has been more advantageous than total gastrectomy in early cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Jejunal interposition is a novel reconstruction technique to prevent reflux esophagitis and anastomotic stricture in proximal gastrectomy. The combination of these two procedures via laparoscopic approach is not yet widespread. Therefore, this study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of this surgery.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study on eight patients with laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy and jejunal interposition for early proximal gastric cancer. Patients were followed up at 1, 3, and 6 months and then at 6-month intervals to investigate complications, recurrence, metastasis, and survival.
RESULTS: All cases were adenocarcinoma in the early stage (cT1N0M0). The median (range) operating time and postoperative hospital stay were 145 min (120-210) and 7 days (6-9), respectively. No complication (including reflux esophagitis and anastomotic stricture) occurred. All patients were alive without any recurrence or metastasis during the median follow-up of 28 months (ranged 6-40 months).
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for early gastric cancer is safe and feasible with good long-term outcomes. Further large studies are required to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Early stage; Gastric cancer; Jejunal interposition; Laparoscopy; Proximal gastrectomy

Year:  2021        PMID: 32440851     DOI: 10.1007/s12029-020-00420-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer


  19 in total

1.  Completely laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition and lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  I Uyama; A Sugioka; J Fujita; Y Komori; H Matsui; A Hasumi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Jejunal interposition operation; analysis of thirty-three clinical cases.

Authors:  G I THOMAS; K A MERENDINO
Journal:  J Am Med Assoc       Date:  1958-11-29

Review 3.  Questionnaire survey regarding the current status and controversial issues concerning reconstruction after gastrectomy in Japan.

Authors:  Kazuhide Kumagai; Kouji Shimizu; Noboru Yokoyama; Sadatsugu Aida; Shuei Arima; Takashi Aikou
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 4.  Gastroesophageal cancer: focus on epidemiology, classification, and staging.

Authors:  Amikar Sehdev; Daniel V T Catenacci
Journal:  Discov Med       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.970

5.  The difficult choice between total and proximal gastrectomy in proximal early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ji Yeong An; Ho Geun Youn; Min Gew Choi; Jae Hyung Noh; Tae Sung Sohn; Sung Kim
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Changes in clinicopathological features and survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer over a 20-year period.

Authors:  H S Ahn; H-J Lee; M-W Yoo; S-H Jeong; D-J Park; H-H Kim; W H Kim; K U Lee; H-K Yang
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 7.  Total vs. proximal gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lei Wen; Xin-Zu Chen; Bin Wu; Xiao-Long Chen; Li Wang; Kun Yang; Bo Zhang; Zhi-Xin Chen; Jia-Ping Chen; Zong-Guang Zhou; Chun-Mei Li; Jian-Kun Hu
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr

Review 8.  International variation.

Authors:  Donald M Parkin
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2004-08-23       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  Prospective study of proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach.

Authors:  H Katai; T Sano; T Fukagawa; H Shinohara; M Sasako
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Quality of life after gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Paul J Karanicolas; Dennis Graham; Mithat Gönen; Vivian E Strong; Murray F Brennan; Daniel G Coit
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  1 in total

1.  Superior pancreatic lymphadenectomy with portal vein priority via posterior common hepatic artery approach in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy.

Authors:  Yu-Jia Zhang; Rong-Chao Xiang; Jun Li; Yong Liu; Si-Ming Xie; Liang An; Hua-Lin Li; Gang Mai
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 1.337

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.