Literature DB >> 32440391

Component Facelift Approach to the Temporomandibular Joint.

Yassmin Parsaei1,2, Seija Maniskas1, Karl C Bruckman1, Derek Steinbacher1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32440391      PMCID: PMC7209855          DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open        ISSN: 2169-7574


× No keyword cloud information.

INTRODUCTION

Surgical management of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) may be necessary for various conditions such as internal derangement and disc displacement, disc degeneration, condylar resorption, and condylar hyperplasia.[1,2] Obtaining sufficient exposure to the TMJ during reconstructive surgery can prove difficult due to the high complexity of regional anatomy.[3] Various surgical approaches have been developed to allow exposure of the joint and surrounding structures. Conventional approach to the joint requires a composite preauricular incision, which limits accessibility and requires significant retraction, leaving the facial nerve vulnerable to injury. Furthermore, the preauricular approach can result in unsightly scarring at the incision site. The purpose of this video (see Video [online], which displays the authors’ component approach to expose and manipulate the TMJ, including the glenoid fossa, eminence, zygomatic arch, capsule, articular disc, condyle, and coronoid. The video further demonstrates specific maneuvers and operative sequence of eminectomy, condylar shave (high condylectomy), disc plication, and fat grafting to the joint) is to demonstrate our preferred component approach for achieving optimal functional and esthetic results, while addressing internal derangement of the TMJ.
Video 1.

TMJ Facelift Approach. Video from “Component Facelift Approach to the Temporomandibular Joint”

INDICATIONS AND MANAGEMENT

A 57-year-old woman with a history of TMJ pain, clicking and condylar subluxation is featured. Examination reveals palpable lateral poles with clicking upon opening and increased tenderness on the left side. Computed tomography scan demonstrates arthritic changes and cysts, especially on the left condylar head. Conservative therapy was attempted and failed. As such, surgery was planned with the goal to improve function, halt the progression of arthritis, and alleviate pain.

OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE

The surgical field is prepared and draped. The planned approach is marked and a dilute epinephrine solution is administered. A retrotragal incision is made from the root of the helix to the lobule. A skin flap is elevated subcutaneously toward the malar region and sutured forward. The expected trajectory of the frontal branch is noted. A SMAS flap is marked out above the zygomatic arch and dissected while testing for the facial nerve. The zygomatic arch is exposed subperiosteally and the superior joint space entered. The capsule is followed laterally/inferiorly and divided (exposing the disc and condyle). The planned eminectomy is marked and performed using a fissure burr and osteotomes. The transition to the glenoid fossa is rasped. The condylar head is visualized and irregularities smoothed. A high condylectomy could be performed at this time if indicated. The mandible is opened and closed to ensure proper hinge and translation motion with the disc capturing. This disk can be repaired and repositioned if needed. Strained, harvested fat is injected within the inferior and superior joint space for its anti-inflammatory properties.[4] The capsule is closed, and the SMAS flap repositioned and secured over top. The skin is closed in a layered fashion. Botox is injected into the masseter and temporalis. A facial compression garment is placed. The patient is discharged on the same day after recovery.

POSTOPERATIVE CARE

A soft diet is maintained for 1 week postoperatively. Stooping, heavy lifting, and strenuous exercise are avoided during this time period. Skin sutures are removed at 1 week.

DISCUSSION

Access to the temporomandibular joint is necessary for surgical management of a variety of conditions.[1,2] Internal derangement of the joint is a frequent pathology, characterized by abnormal disc displacement, resulting in significant pain and degeneration of the articular surfaces. Other common disorders include inflammatory joint conditions (rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, and infectious arthritis), which can cause degeneration of the articular cartilage, synovial tissues, and the mandibular condyle. Congenital or developmental disorders such as condylar hyperplasia or aplasia can also adversely affect the TMJ. Although most patients are treated successfully with conservative measures, chronic conditions may require surgical interventions such as condylectomy, disc repositioning, meniscectomy, and possible reconstruction.[5,6] Open-joint procedures of the TMJ can prove challenging due to the many anatomic structures in the region such as the facial nerve, auriculotemporal nerve, superficial temporal artery and vein, middle temporal artery and vein, and the parotid gland.[3] It is critical for the surgeon to identify the ideal surgical approach which provides adequate exposure of the joint with maximal protection of adjacent structures and formation of an inconspicuous scar. Difficulties with access and surgical complications have been reported with many existing methods. In the conventional preauricular approach, significant retraction of the tissue flap to expose the TMJ risks temporary or permanent impairment of the facial nerve as well as bleeding of the temporal vessels.[7,8] The composite flap further limits the predictability of anatomic exposure and results in visible scarring at the incision site. Although the endaural approach minimizes postoperative scarring, tragus cartilage damage and risk of possible perichondritis remain a significant disadvantage.[9] A postauricular approach also increases the risk of infection and meatal stenosis while limiting anterior exposure.[10] Our component approach to the TMJ utilizing a rhytidectomy incision with a deep SMAS flap allows for a layered dissection, improving the visibility of vital structures and minimizing the risk of injury (facial nerve).[11] Administration of dilute epinephrine ensures adequate hemostasis without impairment of the facial nerve so it may be stimulated during dissection.[12] A beveled incision perpendicular to the hair follicles allows for good regrowth and concealment of incision scars behind the hairline and natural contours of the face and ear.[13] Autologous fat transplantation decreases postoperative edema and scar tissue formation.[4]

CONCLUSIONS

We describe our component approach to the TMJ and its surrounding structures. A rhytidectomy dissection technique with a deep SMAS flap elevation allows for wide surgical access to the TMJ and capsule. The risk of structural damage to surrounding vessels and scar visibility is minimized. The video (see Video [online], which displays the authors’ component approach to expose and manipulate the TMJ, including the glenoid fossa, eminence, zygomatic arch, capsule, articular disc, condyle, and coronoid. The video further demonstrates specific maneuvers and operative sequence of eminectomy, condylar shave [high condylectomy], disc plication, and fat grafting to the joint) further highlights the surgical incision, dissection, and operative order in the treatment of internal derangement of the TMJ.
  10 in total

1.  Use of dilute epinephrine as an aid in facial nerve monitoring.

Authors:  R O Jones; T K Mellert
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1991-11

Review 2.  Component approach to the temporomandibular joint and coronoid process.

Authors:  Miles J Pfaff; James Clune; Derek Steinbacher
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-06-03

Review 3.  Diagnosis and treatment of temporomandibular disorders.

Authors:  Robert L Gauer; Michael J Semidey
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 3.292

4.  Surgery of the temporomandibular joint. I. Surgical anatomy and surgical incisions.

Authors:  K L Kreutziger
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1984-12

5.  Eminectomy and plication of the posterior disc attachment following arthrotomy for temporomandibular joint internal derangement.

Authors:  Andrew J Baldwin; John C Cooper
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Does Fat Grafting Influence Postoperative Edema in Orthognathic Surgery?

Authors:  Raysa Cabrejo; Christopher R DeSesa; Rajendra Sawh-Martinez; Derek M Steinbacher
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 7.  Techniques for creating inconspicuous face-lift scars: avoiding visible incisions and loss of temporal hair.

Authors:  Russell W H Kridel; Edmund S Liu
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug

8.  A new surgical approach for the treatment of chronic recurrent temporomandibular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Piero Cascone; Claudio Ungari; Francesco Paparo; Tito Matteo Marianetti; Valerio Ramieri; Mg Fatone
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 9.  Temporomandibular disorders: a review of etiology, clinical management, and tissue engineering strategies.

Authors:  Meghan K Murphy; Regina F MacBarb; Mark E Wong; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Difficulties encountered in preauricular approach over retromandibular approach in condylar fracture.

Authors:  Perumal Jayavelu; R Riaz; A R Tariq Salam; B Saravanan; R Karthick
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2016-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.