| Literature DB >> 32439841 |
Igor Khmelinskii1, Vladimir I Makarov2.
Abstract
We highlight mechanical stretching and bending of membranes and the importance of membrane deformations in the analysis of swelling dynamics of biological systems, including cells and subcellular organelles. Membrane deformation upon swelling generates tensile stress and internal pressure, contributing to volume changes in biological systems. Therefore, in addition to physical (internal/external) and chemical factors, mechanical properties of the membranes should be considered in modeling analysis of cellular swelling. Here we describe an approach that considers mechanical properties of the membranes in the analysis of swelling dynamics of biological systems. This approach includes membrane bending and stretching deformations into the model, producing a more realistic description of swelling. We also discuss the effects of membrane stretching on swelling dynamics. We report that additional pressure generated by membrane bending is negligible, compared to pressures generated by membrane stretching, when both membrane surface area and volume are variable parameters. Note that bending deformations are reversible, while stretching deformation may be irreversible, leading to membrane disruption when they exceed a certain threshold level. Therefore, bending deformations need only be considered in reversible physiological swelling, whereas stretching deformations should also be considered in pathological irreversible swelling. Thus, the currently proposed approach may be used to develop a detailed biophysical model describing the transition from physiological to pathological swelling mode.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32439841 PMCID: PMC7242427 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-65217-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Erythrocyte modelled by an oblate axisymmetric ellipsoid; a = b = a0 = 8 µm and c = 2 µm.
The membrane rigidity tensor components[24,25].
| Parameter | Value | Units |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | – | |
| 0.008 ± 0.001 | dyn/nm | |
| 0.0101 ± 0.0011 | dyn/nm | |
| (1.6 ± 0.2)×104 | μm– | |
| (1.8 ± 0.2)×104 | μm– | |
| (3.1 ± 0.7)×102 | μl·min–1Pa–1μm–2 |
The values of the tensor components were exchanged as compared to our previous publications[23,25], since a prolate axisymmetric ellipsoid was considered earlier, while currently we used an oblate axisymmetric ellipsoid.
Figure 2Dynamics of the (a) ζ and (b) ξ parameters induced by the cell swelling, bottom to top: 10 mM NaCl – black line; 20 mM NaCl – red line; 30 mM NaCl – blue line; 40 mM NaCl – green line and 50 mM NaCl – yellow line.
Figure 3The saturated values of the cell surface area (circles) and volume (squares) versus the initial intracellular Na+ and Cl– concentrations.
Equilibrium shape of an oblate axisymmetric ellipsoid modeling an erythrocyte.
| [Na+] = [Cl−], mM | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 8.00 | 2.00 |
| 10 | 8.20 | 2.06 |
| 20 | 8.32 | 2.10 |
| 30 | 8.39 | 2.13 |
| 40 | 8.47 | 2.15 |
| 50 | 8.53 | 2.17 |
Optimized values of the membrane bending rigidity constants k and k, and the bending contribution to pressure Δp.
| [Na+], [Cl−], mM | Δ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1.38 | 0.71 | 11.2 |
| 10 | 1.40 | 0.73 | 9.6 |
| 20 | 1.37 | 0.70 | 8.3 |
| 30 | 1.36 | 0.76 | 7.4 |
| 40 | 1.38 | 0.71 | 6.7 |
| 50 | 1.34 | 0.72 | 6.0 |
Figure 4Bending-induced pressure inside the cell in function of its volume for an oblate axisymmetric ellipsoidal cell.