Literature DB >> 32439371

Context and trade-offs characterize real-world threat detection systems: A review and comprehensive framework to improve research practice and resolve the translational crisis.

Markus Fendt1, Michael H Parsons2, Raimund Apfelbach3, Alexandra J R Carthey4, Chris R Dickman5, Thomas Endres6, Anke S K Frank7, Daniel E Heinz8, Menna E Jones9, Yasushi Kiyokawa10, Judith C Kreutzmann11, Karin Roelofs12, Miriam Schneider13, Julia Sulger14, Carsten T Wotjak15, Daniel T Blumstein16.   

Abstract

A better understanding of context in decision-making-that is, the internal and external conditions that modulate decisions-is required to help bridge the gap between natural behaviors that evolved by natural selection and more arbitrary laboratory models of anxiety and fear. Because anxiety and fear are mechanisms evolved to manage threats from predators and other exigencies, the large behavioral, ecological and evolutionary literature on predation risk is useful for re-framing experimental research on human anxiety-related disorders. We review the trade-offs that are commonly made during antipredator decision-making in wild animals along with the context under which the behavior is performed and measured, and highlight their relevance for focused laboratory models of fear and anxiety. We then develop an integrative mechanistic model of decision-making under risk which, when applied to laboratory and field settings, should improve studies of the biological basis of normal and pathological anxiety and may therefore improve translational outcomes.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal models; Anxiety; Bench-to-bedside gap; Fear; Predator-prey models; Translational neuroscience

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32439371     DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev        ISSN: 0149-7634            Impact factor:   8.989


  8 in total

1.  Defensive freezing and its relation to approach-avoidance decision-making under threat.

Authors:  Felix H Klaassen; Leslie Held; Bernd Figner; Jill X O'Reilly; Floris Klumpers; Lycia D de Voogd; Karin Roelofs
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Are physiological and behavioural responses to stressors displayed concordantly by wild urban rodents?

Authors:  Loren L Fardell; Miguel A Bedoya-Pérez; Christopher R Dickman; Mathew S Crowther; Chris R Pavey; Edward J Narayan
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2021-01-07

3.  Existence of wild brown rats (Rattus norvegicus) that are indifferent to novel objects.

Authors:  Ryoko Koizumi; Yasushi Kiyokawa; Kazuyuki D Tanaka; Goro Kimura; Tsutomu Tanikawa; Yukari Takeuchi
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 1.267

4.  A hypothalamic-thalamostriatal circuit that controls approach-avoidance conflict in rats.

Authors:  D S Engelke; X O Zhang; J J O'Malley; J A Fernandez-Leon; S Li; G J Kirouac; M Beierlein; F H Do-Monte
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Approach-Avoidance Decisions Under Threat: The Role of Autonomic Psychophysiological States.

Authors:  James J A Livermore; Felix H Klaassen; Bob Bramson; Anneloes M Hulsman; Sjoerd W Meijer; Leslie Held; Floris Klumpers; Lycia D de Voogd; Karin Roelofs
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Exploratory drive, fear, and anxiety are dissociable and independent components in foraging mice.

Authors:  Daniel E Heinz; Vivian A Schöttle; Paulina Nemcova; Florian P Binder; Tim Ebert; Katharina Domschke; Carsten T Wotjak
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 7.  Effect of Estrous Cycle on Behavior of Females in Rodent Tests of Anxiety.

Authors:  Thelma A Lovick; Hélio Zangrossi
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 4.157

8.  Odour-mediated Interactions Between an Apex Reptilian Predator and its Mammalian Prey.

Authors:  Christopher R Dickman; Loren L Fardell; Nicole Hills
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.793

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.