Literature DB >> 32439209

Characteristics and prognostic factors of disease severity in patients with COVID-19: The Beijing experience.

Ying Sun1, Yanli Dong2, Lifeng Wang3, Huan Xie4, Baosen Li5, Christopher Chang6, Fu-Sheng Wang7.   

Abstract

COVID-19 has become one of the worst infectious disease outbreaks of recent times, with over 2.1 million cases and 120,000 deaths so far. Our study investigated the demographic, clinical, laboratory and imaging features of 63 patients with COVID-19 in Beijing. Patients were classified into four groups, mild, moderate, severe and critically ill. The mean age of our patients was 47 years of age (range 3-85) and there was a slight male predominance (58.7%). Thirty percent of our patients had severe or critically ill disease, but only 20% of severe and 33% of critically ill patients had been to Wuhan. Fever was the most common presentation (84.1%), but cough was present in only slightly over half of the patients. We found that lymphocyte and eosinophils count were significantly decreased in patients with severe disease (p = 0.001 and p = 0.000, respectively). Eosinopenia was a feature of higher levels of severity. Peripheral CD4+, CD8+ T lymphocytes, and B lymphocytes were significantly decreased in severe and critically ill patients, but there was only a non-statistically significant downward trend in NK cell numbers with severity. Of note is that liver function tests including AST, ALT, GGT and LDH were elevated, and albumin was decreased. The inflammatory markers CRP, ESR and ferritin were elevated in patients with severe disease or worse. IL-6 levels were also higher, indicating that the presence of a hyperimmune inflammatory state portends higher morbidity and mortality. In a binary logistic regression model, C-reactive protein level (OR 1.073, [CI, 1.013-1.136]; p = 0.017), CD8 T lymphocyte counts (OR 0.989, [CI, 0.979-1.000]; p = 0.043), and D-dimer (OR 5.313, [CI, 0.325-86.816]; p = 0.241) were independent predictors of disease severity.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2019 novel coronavirus disease; COVID-19; Cytokine storm; Elevated liver enzymes; Interleukin-6; Lymphocyte subsets; Mortality; Prognosis; SARS-CoV-2

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32439209      PMCID: PMC7180376          DOI: 10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Autoimmun        ISSN: 0896-8411            Impact factor:   7.094


Introduction

In December 2019, several patients with a pneumonia of unknown etiology were treated in Wuhan, China. By late December 2019, a novel coronavirus originally named 2019-nCoV was found to be the etiology of these illness. The terminology was later updated by the WHO whereby the disease is named COVID-19 and it is caused by the virus SARS-CoV-2 [1,2]. On January 21, 2020, the Department of Infectious Disease at the Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital was designated to be one of the medical institutions for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with COVID-19 in Beijing, China. On February 24, 2020, the WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) reported that 13.8% of those infected with COVID-19 had severe disease, with a case fatality rate of 3.8%. As of April 3, 2020, the case fatality rate of COVID-19 in China is approximately 4.0% [3]. At this time, the epidemic situation across China has been effectively controlled, and most of the new cases in China are currently imported from abroad. This study aims to evaluate the characteristics and prognostic factors of disease severity in patients with COVID-19 in Beijing.

Patients and methods

This study evaluated the characteristics and prognostic factors of disease severity in 63 confirmed non-imported COVID-19 patients in Beijing. Diagnostic criteria for COVID-19 pneumonia was based on the New Coronavirus Pneumonia Prevention and Control Program (7th edition) published by the National Health Commission of China [4]. Various specimens including respiratory samples from throat swab or sputum, urine, blood or stool samples were collected and tested for SARS-CoV-2 following WHO guidelines for quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) [5,6]. Positive results of COVID-19 infection were defined as any positive test from the above specimens. Routine serial hematologic and biochemical tests were performed after admission, and the serum samples were screened for common respiratory pathogens, including antibodies to adenovirus, chlamydia pneumoniae, mycoplasma pneumoniae, respiratory syncytial virus, coxsackie virus A16, legionella pneumophila and mycobacterium tuberculosis and all were negative. Chest X-Ray and chest CT scans were obtained for all patients and monitored serially. Data were analyzed with SPSS V.21.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous variables are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) or as the median (range). The analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test was used for comparison between multiple groups. Categorical variables were expressed as a number (%). Intergroup comparison was performed using chi-square test. Spearman correlation coefficient was used to describe the association between different variables and adverse events. The logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with adverse events. Odds ratios and their associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as measures of effect size. p value less than 0.05 (two-tailed) was considered to be statistically significant.

Clinical characteristics

Patients were categorized into mild, moderate, severe and critically ill levels of severity based on the criteria shown in Table 1 . Eight patients were identified to have mild disease (12.7%), 36 had moderate disease (57.1%), 10 had severe diseases (15.9%) and nine were critically ill (14.3%). Patients with severe or critical disease accounted for 30.2%. Table 2 shows the demographic, epidemiologic, and clinical features of patients at admission. The median patient age was 47 years, with a range of 3–85 years of age. Fig. 1 shows the age and demographic characteristics of patients with COVID-19. COVID-19 preferentially affects males (37 of 63, 58.7%). The sex distribution for the various levels of severity showed that among the mild cases, 7 (87.5%) were male, among moderate cases, 19 (52.8%) were male, among severe cases, 6 (60.0%) were male and among critically ill patients, 5 (55.6%) were male (Fig. 2 ). There was a statistically significant difference among the four groups (p < 0.001).
Table 1

Defining level of severity in COVID-19.

Clinical categoryDefinition
Mild diseaseMild symptoms and normal or non-pneumonia findings on radiographic examination
Moderate diseaseRespiratory symptoms and fever, with evidence of pneumonia on radiographic examination
Severe diseaseDyspnea, respiratory frequency ≥30/minute, blood oxygen saturation ≤93%, PaO2/FiO2 ratio <300, and/or lung infiltrates >50% of the lung field within 24–48 h
Critically illRespiratory failure and mechanical ventilation required, septic shock, and/or multiple organ dysfunction/failure and requires ICU monitoring and treatment
Table 2

Demographic and epidemiologic characteristics of patients with COVID-19 in beijing.

CharacteristicMild disease (n = 8)Moderate disease (n = 36)Severe disease (n = 10)Critically ill (n = 9)Total (n = 63)p value
Median age (range)23 (3, 48)47 (13, 78)59 (33, 85)63 (34, 79)47 (3, 85)0.000
BMI23.40 ± 4.9824.09 ± 3.1425.95 ± 3.1725.13 ± 3.2024.45 ± 3.430.338
Epidemiologic
Travel history to Wuhan in 14 days before the onset8 (100.0%)22 (61.1%)2 (20.0%)3 (33.3%)35 (55.6%)0.017
History of contact with a person from Wuhan or around Wuhan in the 14 days before onset2 (25.0%)17 (47.2%)4 (40.0%)3 (33.3%)26 (41.3%)0.602
Contact with a confirmed case of COVID-19 infection3 (37.5%)24 (66.7%)3 (30.0%)4 (44.4%)34 (54.0%)0.549
Case clustering2 (25.0%)25 (69.4%)5 (50.0%)4 (44.4%)36 (57.1%)0.363
Symptoms, n (%)
Fever4 (50.0%)35 (97.2%)7 (70.0%)7 (77.8%)53 (84.1%)0.004
Chills01 (2.8%)001 (1.6%)0.182
Myalgia1 (12.5%)9 (25.0%)2 (20.0%)4 (44.4%)16 (25.4%)0.461
Cough2 (25.0%)21 (58.3%)5 (50%)6 (66.7%)34 (54.0%)0.256
Headache07 (19.4%)1 (10.0%)08 (12.7%)0.260
Anorexia1 (12.5%)11 (30.6%)2 (20%)3 (33.3%)17 (27.0%)0.678
Sputum production09 (25.0%)6 (60.0%)4 (44.4%)19 (30.2%)0.029
Shortness of breath01 (2.8%)4 (40.0%)6 (66.67%)11 (17.5%)0.000
Dizziness1 (12.5%)5 (13.9%)01 (11.1%)7 (11.1%)0.671
Diarrhea04 (11.1%)1 (10.0%)05 (7.9%)0.549
Sore throat2 (25%)9 (25.0%)1 (10.0%)05 (7.9%)0.301
Runny nose01 (2.8%)001 (1.6%)0.068
Fig. 1

Age and clinical type distribution of COVID-19.

Fig. 2

Sex distribution of COVID-19 with different clinical classification.

Defining level of severity in COVID-19. Demographic and epidemiologic characteristics of patients with COVID-19 in beijing. Age and clinical type distribution of COVID-19. Sex distribution of COVID-19 with different clinical classification. The mean BMI of the 63 patients was 24.45 ± 3.43, and there was no statistically significant difference among the four groups. Thirty-five patients (55.6%) had a travel history to Wuhan in the 14 days before the onset of symptoms, and twenty-six (41.3%) patients without a travel history to Wuhan had a history of contact with a person from or near Wuhan in the 14 days before the onset of illness. Thirty-four (54.0%) of 63 patients had close contact with patients with COVID-19 and 36 (57.1%) had a history of family clustering. Patients with coexisting conditions were more susceptible to severe disease and 29 of our 63 patients had 1 or more coexisting diseases, including hypertension in 12 cases, diabetes mellitus in 5, cerebral infarction in 2, cardiac arrhythmia in 2, prostate cancer in 1, bronchial asthma in 2, pulmonary tuberculosis in 1, claustrophobia in 1, thyroid disease in 3, chronic hepatitis in 2, and chicken pox in 1. This is shown in Table 3 . The most common symptoms were fever (84.1%) and cough (54.0%), but diarrhea was not common.
Table 3

Comorbidities of patients with COVID-19.

ComorbiditiesMild diseaseModerate diseaseSevere diseaseCritically ill
Hypertension813
Diabetes mellitus221
Cerebral infarction2
Cardiac arrhythmia11
Prostate cancer1
Bronchial asthma11
Pulmonary tuberculosis1
Claustrophobia1
Thyroid disease12
Liver disease1 (Hepatitis B)1 (NAFLD)
Chicken pox1

NAFLD = Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Comorbidities of patients with COVID-19. NAFLD = Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Laboratory features

Laboratory tests on admission showed leukopenia in 11 patients (17.5%), lymphopenia in 11 patients (17.5%), thrombocytopenia in 3 patients (4.8%), anemia in 10 patients (15.9%), and eosinopenia in 30 patients (47.6%) (Table 4 ). The leukocyte, neutrophil, lymphocyte, eosinophil counts and hemoglobin level differed significantly among the four severity groups. Eosinopenia was not found in patients with mild disease but was found in 19 patients (52.8%) with moderate disease, 7 patients (70.0%) with severe disease and 4 critically ill patients (44.4%).
Table 4

Laboratory findings in Patients with COVID-19 at admission.

Laboratory FindingMild disease (n = 8)Moderate disease (n = 36)Severe disease (n = 10)Critically ill (n = 9)Total (n = 63)p value
Leukocyte count, 109 cells/L5.92 ± 1.294.56 ± 1.21 d#5.01 ± 1.766.84 ± 3.575.13 ± 1.950.007
Neutrophil count, 109 cells/L3.25 ± 0.82 c#2.70 ± 1.01 d#3.76 ± 1.85 f*5.54 ± 3.703.32 ± 1.960.001
Lymphocyte count, 109 cells/L2.00 ± 0.64 a.b.c#1.42 ± 0.56 d.e#0.90 ± 0.470.83 ± 0.501.32 ± 0.650.001
Hemoglobin level, g/L144.88 ± 12.63 c#137.67 ± 14.07 e#134.5 ± 16.79119.33 ± 30.85135.46 ± 18.590.021
Platelet count, 109 cells/L204.38 ± 49.16180.31 ± 56.84183.40 ± 71.87193.56 ± 75.86185.75 ± 60.500.759
Eosinophils count, 109 cells/L0.14 ± 0.06 a.b.#0.03 ± 0.045*0.01 ± 0.00 f*0.09 ± 0.140.05 ± 0.070.000
Monocytes count, 109 cells/L0.46 ± 0.160.55 ± 0.990.33 ± 0.190.37 ± 0.190.48 ± 0.750.835
PT, s12.01 ± 1.13 c*12.14 ± 0.81 e*12.57 ± 2.19 f*21.30 ± 8.2913.52 ± 9.630.072
PTA (%)88.97 ± 23.3384.04 ± 15.13 e*84.18 ± 23.1066.97 ± 28.3582.14 ± 20.280.097
Fibrinogen, g/L2.04 ± 0.39 a.b.c*3.14 ± 1.003.69 ± 2.043.62 ± 1.523.18 ± 1.320.045
D-dimer, mg/L0.16 ± 0.06 b.c#0.35 ± 0.25 d.e#3.15 ± 3.311.95 ± 2.381.97 ± 1.830.000
Sodium level, mmol/L137.14 ± 3.08137.66 ± 3.30136.40 ± 3.10135.22 ± 4.82137.03 ± 3.520.288
Potassium level, mmol/L4.64 ± 0.31 a.b.#4.14 ± 0.393.97 ± 0.604.26 ± 0.524.18 ± 0.470.020
Albumin level, g/L43.62 ± 3.20 a*.b#.c#39.47 ± 4.09 e#36.80 ± 6.2932.77 ± 5.1738.61 ± 5.380.000
Globulin level, g/L28.63 ± 2.3929.03 ± 4.8129.30 ± 4.6928.00 ± 4.3028.87 ± 4.410.919
Total bilirubin level, mmol/L12.14 ± 9.9812.09 ± 6.8812.14 ± 4.2910.83 ± 5.5311.92 ± 6.690.965
ALT level, U/L29.88 ± 20.7329.39 ± 19.40 e*41.50 ± 47.5883.11 ± 140.4939.05 ± 59.030.100
AST level, U/L31.00 ± 17.00 c*29.61 ± 15.24 e#40.10 ± 27.60 f*95.67 ± 153.6540.89 ± 61.990.034
ALP level, U/L97.50 ± 53.377.00 ± 43.1066.30 ± 20.5373.00 ± 35.9377.33 ± 40.890.436
GGT level, U/L23.25 ± 13.83 b.c*34.28 ± 27.6553.30 ± 45.8954.89 ± 29.3038.84 ± 31.370.061
LDH level, U/L231.75 ± 122.92 c#217.47 ± 51.12 e#279.70 ± 84.36 f*376.89 ± 161.55251.94 ± 103.510.000
Creatine phosphokinase level, U/L80.75 ± 28.93101.55 ± 124.69132.57 ± 111.91137.00 ± 166.51109.68 ± 122.790.826
Urea level, mmol/L4.33 ± 0.67 c#3.99 ± 1.21 e#4.49 ± 1.05 f#9.41 ± 8.694.88 ± 3.780.001
Creatinine level, μmol/L77.13 ± 21.33 c#77.3 ± 12.92 e#74.80 ± 10.99 e#103.11 ± 48.3180.57 ± 23.470.017
C-reactive protein level, mg/L5.08 ± 8.58 b#11.83 ± 17.074#48.92 ± 72.7130.96 ± 29.4619.53 ± 35.940.012
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, mm/60min5.14 ± 4.11*b#.c#25.16 ± 21.28 d*e#45.86 ± 19.0752.13 ± 37.4629.24 ± 26.370.001
Serum ferritin (Times the upper limit of normal)0.55 ± 0.502.c#2.00 ± 2.20 e#3.20 ± 1.475.08 ± 3.292.45 ± 2.480.000
IL-6 level, pg/ml5.26 ± 1.252.c#14.17 ± 11.37 d#e*33.22 ± 31.9034.09 ± 26.4718.50 ± 20.030.001

*p < 0.05.

#p < 0.01.

Compared between mild and moderate disease.

Compared between mild and severe disease.

Compared between mild disease and critically ill.

Compared between moderate and severe disease.

Compared between moderate disease and critically ill.

Compared between severe disease and critically ill.

Laboratory findings in Patients with COVID-19 at admission. *p < 0.05. #p < 0.01. Compared between mild and moderate disease. Compared between mild and severe disease. Compared between mild disease and critically ill. Compared between moderate and severe disease. Compared between moderate disease and critically ill. Compared between severe disease and critically ill. Lymphocyte subset analysis (Table 5 ) showed that CD4+, CD8+ T lymphocytes and B lymphocytes were significantly decreased in severe and critically ill patients. Natural killer (NK) cells, a key component of innate immunity against infection [7], trended lower with increasing severity, but there was no statistically significant difference among the four groups. Prothrombin time (PT) and prothrombin activity (PTA) did not significantly differ among the four groups, but fibrinogen (FIB) and D-dimer levels showed a statistically significant difference, in that the levels were much lower in the mild and moderate disease group compared with the severe disease groups.
Table 5

Lymphocyte Subsets levels in patients with COVID-19.

Laboratory findingMild diseaseModerate diseaseSevere diseaseCritically illTotalp value
Lymphocyte count, cells/μl1767.57 ± 587.82 a.b.c#1202.35 ± 483.66 e*861.50 ± 464.96746.88 ± 503.441172.49 ± 560.250.001
T lymphocyte count, cells/μl1210.75 ± 408.81 a.b.c#808.97 ± 371.22 d*e#522.57 ± 318.73464.67 ± 339.68778.98 ± 417.650.000
CD4 T lymphocyte count, cells/μl689.38 ± 251.29 a.b.c#436.8 ± 225.08 d*e#257.86 ± 129.48270.11 ± 162.75425.36 ± 242.550.000
CD8 T lymphocyte count, cells/μl462.88 ± 154.43 b.c#355.33 ± 166.86 d*e#205.14 ± 153.09202.22 ± 199.10330.43 ± 184.260.004
B lymphocyte count, cells/μl330.71 ± 177.65 a.b.c#148.92 ± 89.33128.83 ± 42.44119.38 ± 59.07164.71 ± 113.660.000
NK cell count, cells/μl288 ± 175.93203.63 ± 209.433185.00 ± 180.11102.88 ± 72.28196.14 ± 189.030.310
CD4/CD8 ratio1.53 ± 0.411.62 ± 1.861.28 ± 0.762.42 ± 1.561.63 ± 1.570.671

*p < 0.05.

#p < 0.01.

Compared between mild and moderate disease.

Compared between mild and severe disease.

Compared between mild disease and critically ill.

Compared between moderate and severe disease.

Compared between moderate disease and critically ill.

Lymphocyte Subsets levels in patients with COVID-19. *p < 0.05. #p < 0.01. Compared between mild and moderate disease. Compared between mild and severe disease. Compared between mild disease and critically ill. Compared between moderate and severe disease. Compared between moderate disease and critically ill. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were elevated in 16 patients (25.4%), aspartate transaminase (AST) levels were elevated in 14 patients (22.2%), alkaline phosphatase levels (ALP) were elevated in 3 patients (4.8%), and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) was elevated in 21 patients (33.3%), but only AST level had statistically significant difference among the four groups (p = 0.034). Albumin level was decreased in 11 patients (17.5%), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were increased in 26 patients (41.3%), and both of albumin and LDH levels showed a statistically significant difference among the four groups. Both creatinine and urea levels were increased in patients with severe diseases, and there were significant differences between the four groups. Creatine phosphokinase, which is mainly found in cardiac myocytes, was elevated in 25 patients (39.7%). Though there was no statistically significant difference in these four different clinical classifications, the levels of creatine phosphokinase in the severe and critically ill groups were much higher than in the mild and moderate patients. C-reactive protein level (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), serum ferritin and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels all had a significant elevation in the severe and critically ill groups.

Radiographic features

On admission, all patients in the mild group had normal imaging. Ground-glass opacities were found in the remaining 55 cases. Seven moderately ill patients had single lobe focal ground-glass opacities and 4 moderately ill patients had multiple unilateral ground-glass opacities. Twenty-four moderately ill patients, 10 severely ill patients and 9 critically ill patients had diffuse multiple bilateral ground-glass opacities. Pleural effusions were found in 1 case with moderate illness, 3 with severe illness and 4 patients who were critically ill (Table 6 ).
Table 6

Radiographic features in patients with COVID-19.

Radiographic featuresMild disease (n = 8)Moderate disease (n = 36)Severe disease (n = 10)Critically ill (n = 9)
No Ground-glass opacities (GGO)8000
Single lobe Focal GGO0703
Multiple unilateral GGO0400
Multiple bilateral GGO024109
Consolidation0832
Pleural effusion0134
Peripheral lung distribution01342
Radiographic features in patients with COVID-19.

Clinical outcomes

Patients were categorized into two groups according to clinical outcome, defined by those with or without an adverse event. Adverse events were defined as any of the following: respiratory rates ≥30 breaths per minute, PaO2/FiO2 ≤300 mmHg, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≤93%, or admission to the intensive care unit. The group with adverse events includes patients with severe disease or who are critically ill. Fig. 3 shows the relationships between clinical characteristics and disease severity, using the Spearman correlation coefficient. The following variables showed significant positive correlation to the disease severity (p < 0.01): advanced age, sputum production, shortness of breath, higher neutrophil count, AST level (p < 0.05), LDH level, GGT level, CRP level, ESR level, serum ferritin level and interleukin-6. Of these, D-dimer, and serum ferritin level had a particularly strong correlation. There was also a positive correlation between ferritin levels and liver function tests (Table 7 ). Patients with higher total lymphocyte count (p < 0.01), T lymphocyte count (p < 0.01), CD8+ T lymphocyte count (p < 0.01), CD4+ T lymphocyte count (p < 0.01), B lymphocyte count (p < 0.05), albumin level (p < 0.01), and sodium level (p < 0.05), were negatively correlated with disease severity, and a travel history to Wuhan in the 14 days prior to the onset of disease was also negatively correlated with disease severity (p < 0.01).
Fig. 3

Correlation coefficient and p value between clinical characteristics and disease severity.

Table 7

Correlation coefficient and p value between liver enzymes and serum ferritin.

ParameterSpearman correlation coefficientp values
ALT0.3850.002
AST0.4370.000
ALP−0.0540.673
GGT0.2040.109
LDH0.3940.001
Correlation coefficient and p value between clinical characteristics and disease severity. Correlation coefficient and p value between liver enzymes and serum ferritin. The variables which showed a significant correlation with disease severity were included in a binary logistic regression model to identify that C-reactive protein level, CD8+ T lymphocyte count, and D-dimer were independent predictors of disease severity (Table 8 ).
Table 8

Independent predictors of disease severity by multivariate Cox regression.

ParameterOdds Ratio95% CIp value
C-reactive protein level1.0731.013–1.1360.017
CD8 T lymphocyte count0.9890.979–1.0000.043
D-dimer5.3130.325–86.8160.241
Independent predictors of disease severity by multivariate Cox regression.

Discussion

The identification of predictive variables may assist physicians in the evidence-based treatment of COVID-19. We analyzed the demographic, clinical, laboratory and imaging features of 63 patients with COVID-19 in Beijing to determine potential biomarkers that may affect the prognosis and management of these patients. COVID-19 can occur in any age group. Our data showed that mild illness appears predominately in those under 30 years of age. Older individuals develop higher levels of severity of disease. Overall, we showed that there was a slight male predominance. Laboratory analysis at the time of admission in our cohort of patients demonstrated that lymphocyte and eosinophil counts were significantly decreased in patients with severe disease (p = 0.001 and p = 0.000, respectively). Eosinopenia was not found in mild disease, but was present in 52.8%, 70% and 44.4% of patients with moderate, severe and critical illness. Evaluation of lymphocytes subsets demonstrated that CD4+, CD8+ T lymphocytes and B lymphocytes were both reduced in severe disease and critically ill patients. Natural killer (NK) cell counts were on a downward trend with increasing severity, but there was no statistical difference among the four groups. Adam et al. reported that in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, eosinopenia increases the risk of treatment failure and in-hospital mortality [8]. Other studies have also demonstrated eosinopenia in late stage bacterial pneumonias, as well as COVID-19 [9]. This is consistent with our results of eosinopenia in more severely affected patients. It has been shown that both SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 use the same angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor to enter host cells [10,11]. The pathophysiology following viral entry is under intense study, and our data showed the total T lymphocytes, CD4+, CD8+ T lymphocytes and B lymphocyte counts were all significant decreased in severe and critically ill patients on admission. These immunological characteristics were also seen in SARS-CoV-1 infection [12]. These results indicate that SARS-CoV-2, like its predecessor has a negative impact on T-cell mediated immunity [13]. In other viral infections, such as HIV, CD4+ lymphocytes have been found to migrate to various tissues such as lymph nodes and bone marrow, supporting the theory that homing of CD4+ or CD8+ lymphocytes may be responsible for depletion of these cells in the peripheral blood [14]. In dengue virus, T cells have been capable of skin homing [15]. So the possibility exists that the reason for the lymphopenia in COVID-19 could be the result of homing of lymphocyte subsets to the lung, although the actual clinical evidence for this has yet to be uncovered. Liver injury in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection is not rare [16]. We found that ALT levels were elevated in 25.4% of patients, AST elevated in 22.2%, ALP elevated in 4.8%, and GGT elevated in 33.3% of patients, although only AST level was much higher in the critically ill patients and showed significance difference among the four groups. However, albumin level was much lower and LDH levels were much higher in the severity patients, and there was a statistically significant difference among the four groups (p = 0.000 and p = 0.000). Of these 63 patients, only two had a history of liver disease with normal liver function, one with hepatitis B undergoing antivirus treatment, the other with NAFLD. We found that the inflammatory markers CRP level, ESR, serum ferritin and interleukin-6 levels were elevated in severe and critically ill groups, and that serum ferritin level was positively associated with ALT, AST and LDH levels, but not with ALP and GGT. Serum ferritin levels can be affected by iron status and may indicate a hyperimmune state. It is a marker for hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis [17,18], which is a known complication of viral infections. It is often accompanied by an increase in certain cytokines such as IL-2Rα [19]. Serum ferritin has been found to correlate with the presence of or severity of disease in other diseases states, including inflammatory conditions such as macrophage activation syndrome [20]. Severe disease, characterized by massive alveolar damage and progressive respiratory failure, may be related to a cytokine storm event [21]. In cytokine storm, increases in interleukin (IL)-2, IL-7, granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), interferon-γ inducible protein 10, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1, macrophage inflammatory protein 1-α, and tumor necrosis factor-α may be observed. In addition to the above cytokines, the pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β and IL-6 are often significant contributors to the host response to infections and increased morbidity and mortality [22]. IL-6 is an example of a multifunctional cytokine involved in the mediation of the immune response and inflammation [23,24]. IL-6 is produced mainly by monocytes, but also be produced by interstitial fibroblasts and alveolar macrophages in the lung [25,26]. IL-6 has also been shown to be involved in the pathogenesis of acute lung injury [27]. Histological characteristics in the lung of COVID-19 patients showed diffuse alveolar damage and interstitial lymphocytes infiltrates [11]. IL-6 may act as a functional mediator to recruit lymphocytes into the lung lesions, which can further secrete IL-6 in a vicious cycle, thus aggravating the lung injury and hastening death. Early clinical and laboratory factors contributing to disease severity were advanced age, sputum production, shortness of breath, elevated neutrophil count, AST, LDH and GGT levels, elevated CRP and ESR, high serum ferritin level, increased interleukin-6 and D-dimer. In the binary logistic regression model C-reactive protein level (OR 1.073,[CI, 1.013–1.136]; p = 0.017), CD8+ T lymphocyte count(OR 0.989,[CI, 0.979–1.000]; p = 0.043), and D-dimer (OR 5.313,[CI, 0.325–86.816]; p = 0.241) were independent predictors of disease severity. D-dimer did not reach statistical significance possibly due to its effect on other factors.

Conclusions

COVID-19 primarily attacks the lungs, but other organ systems can sustain injury as well, including the heart and liver. Disease severity increased with advancing age. Our findings indicated that C-reactive protein level, CD8 T lymphocyte count, and D-dimer were independent predictors of disease severity in COVID-19 patients in Beijing.

Ethical statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Funding

No funding.
  24 in total

Review 1.  Biology of multifunctional cytokines: IL 6 and related molecules (IL 1 and TNF).

Authors:  S Akira; T Hirano; T Taga; T Kishimoto
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  IL-1 and tumor necrosis factor synergistically stimulate fibroblast IL-6 production and stabilize IL-6 messenger RNA.

Authors:  J A Elias; V Lentz
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1990-07-01       Impact factor: 5.422

3.  Human alveolar macrophage and blood monocyte interleukin-6 production.

Authors:  R M Kotloff; J Little; J A Elias
Journal:  Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 6.914

4.  CD4 lymphocytes in the blood of HIV(+) individuals migrate rapidly to lymph nodes and bone marrow: support for homing theory of CD4 cell depletion.

Authors:  Jenny J-Y Chen; Jason C Huang; Mark Shirtliff; Elma Briscoe; Seham Ali; Fernando Cesani; David Paar; Miles W Cloyd
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.962

Review 5.  Acute Lung Injury: A Clinical and Molecular Review.

Authors:  Yasmeen Butt; Anna Kurdowska; Timothy Craig Allen
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.534

6.  Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as a SARS-CoV-2 receptor: molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic target.

Authors:  Haibo Zhang; Josef M Penninger; Yimin Li; Nanshan Zhong; Arthur S Slutsky
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR.

Authors:  Victor M Corman; Olfert Landt; Marco Kaiser; Richard Molenkamp; Adam Meijer; Daniel Kw Chu; Tobias Bleicker; Sebastian Brünink; Julia Schneider; Marie Luisa Schmidt; Daphne Gjc Mulders; Bart L Haagmans; Bas van der Veer; Sharon van den Brink; Lisa Wijsman; Gabriel Goderski; Jean-Louis Romette; Joanna Ellis; Maria Zambon; Malik Peiris; Herman Goossens; Chantal Reusken; Marion Pg Koopmans; Christian Drosten
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2020-01

8.  Iron behaving badly: inappropriate iron chelation as a major contributor to the aetiology of vascular and other progressive inflammatory and degenerative diseases.

Authors:  Douglas B Kell
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 3.063

Review 9.  The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak.

Authors:  Hussin A Rothan; Siddappa N Byrareddy
Journal:  J Autoimmun       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 7.094

10.  Liver injury in COVID-19: management and challenges.

Authors:  Chao Zhang; Lei Shi; Fu-Sheng Wang
Journal:  Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-03-04
View more
  78 in total

1.  Association of Low Molecular Weight Plasma Aminothiols with the Severity of Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Authors:  Evgeny Vladimirovich Kryukov; Alexander Vladimirovich Ivanov; Vladimir Olegovich Karpov; Valery Vasil'evich Alexandrin; Alexander Mikhaylovich Dygai; Maria Petrovna Kruglova; Gennady Ivanovich Kostiuchenko; Sergei Petrovich Kazakov; Aslan Amirkhanovich Kubatiev
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2021-09-18       Impact factor: 6.543

2.  COVID-RDNet: A novel coronavirus pneumonia classification model using the mixed dataset by CT and X-rays images.

Authors:  Lingling Fang; Xin Wang
Journal:  Biocybern Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 5.687

3.  SARS-Cov-2 Infection in Severe Asthma Patients Treated With Biologics.

Authors:  Andriana I Papaioannou; Evangelia Fouka; Nikolaos Tzanakis; Katerina Antoniou; Konstantinos Samitas; Eleftherios Zervas; Konstantinos Kostikas; Konstantinos Bartziokas; Konstantinos Porpodis; Despoina Papakosta; Argyris Tzouvelekis; Irini Gerogianni; Ourania Kotsiou; Michael Makris; Nikoletta Rovina; Garyfallia Vlachou; Miltiadis Markatos; Stelios Vittorakis; Konstantinos Katsoulis; Ilias Papanikolaou; Andreas Afthinos; Paraskevi Katsaounou; Paschalis Steiropoulos; Dimitrios Latsios; Katerina Dimakou; Sofia Koukidou; Georgios Hillas; Stavros Tryfon; Maria Kallieri; Athina Georgopoulou; Pantelis Avarlis; Petros Bakakos; Katerina Markopoulou; Eleni Gaki; Asimina Paspala; Zacharoula Kyriakaki; Konstantinos I Gourgoulianis; Spyridon Papiris; Stelios Loukides
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2022-06-23

Review 4.  Cytokine Storm: The Primary Determinant for the Pathophysiological Evolution of COVID-19 Deterioration.

Authors:  Ruirong Chen; Zhien Lan; Jujian Ye; Limin Pang; Yi Liu; Wei Wu; Xiaohuan Qin; Yang Guo; Peidong Zhang
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 7.561

5.  Plasma S-Adenosylmethionine Is Associated with Lung Injury in COVID-19.

Authors:  Evgeny Vladimirovich Kryukov; Alexander Vladimirovich Ivanov; Vladimir Olegovich Karpov; Valery Vasil'evich Aleksandrin; Alexander Mikhaylovich Dygai; Maria Petrovna Kruglova; Gennady Ivanovich Kostiuchenko; Sergei Petrovich Kazakov; Aslan Amirkhanovich Kubatiev
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.434

Review 6.  Immuno-inflammatory predictors of disease severity in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Suchismita Panda; Rachita Nanda; Prasanta Kumar Tripathy; Manaswini Mangaraj
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2021-04-08

7.  May viral load detected in saliva in the early stages of infection be a prognostic indicator in COVID-19 patients?

Authors:  Sukru Aydin; Isilay Gokce Benk; Aysegul Altintop Geckil
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.014

Review 8.  Micronutrients Deficiency, Supplementation and Novel Coronavirus Infections-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Min Xian Wang; Sylvia Xiao Wei Gwee; Junxiong Pang
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Clinical Efficacy of Corticosteroids in the Early Stages of Deterioration in COVID-19 Pneumonia.

Authors:  Zheng Liu; Dong-Fang Zhao; Fang Shi; Jun-Xia Liu; Jia-Qi Liu; Jing Li; Qian Wang; Hui Wang; Chang-Lan Gao; Jian-Min Li
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Association between the peripheral blood eosinophil counts and COVID-19: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rong Huang; Liangcai Xie; Junpeng He; Hong Dong; Tianchun Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.