Leslie D Williams1, Umedjon Ibragimov2, Barbara Tempalski3, Ronald Stall4, Anna Satcher Johnson5, Guoshen Wang5, Hannah L F Cooper2, Samuel R Friedman6. 1. Division of Community Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health, Chicago. Electronic address: lesliedw@uic.edu. 2. Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA. 3. Institute for Infectious Disease Research, National Development and Research Institutes, New York, NY; North Jersey Community Research Initiative (NJCRI) at North Jersey AIDS Alliance, Inc Newark, NJ. 4. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh. 5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. 6. Institute for Infectious Disease Research, National Development and Research Institutes, New York, NY; Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York.
Abstract
PURPOSE: After years of stable or declining HIV prevalence and declining incidence among people who inject drugs (PWID) in the United States, some rapidly emerging outbreaks have recently occurred in new areas (e.g., Scott County, Indiana). However, to our knowledge, trends over time in HIV prevalence among PWID in US metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) across all major regions of the country have not been systematically estimated beyond 2002, and the extent to which HIV prevalence may be increasing in other areas is largely unknown. This article estimates HIV prevalence among PWID in 89 of the most populated US MSAs, both overall and by geographic region, using more recent surveillance and HIV testing data. METHODS: We computed MSA-specific annual estimates of HIV prevalence (both diagnosed and undiagnosed infections) among PWID for these 89 MSAs, for 1992-2013, using several data series from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) National HIV Surveillance System and National HIV Prevention Monitoring and Evaluation data; Holmberg's (1997) estimates of 1992 PWID population size and of HIV prevalence and incidence among PWID; and research estimates from published literature using 1992-2013 data. A mixed effects model, with time nested within MSAs, was used to regress the literature review estimates on all of the other data series. Multiple imputation was used to address missing data. Resulting estimates were validated using previous 1992-2002 estimates of HIV prevalence and data on antiretroviral (ARV) prescription volumes and examined for patterns based on geographic region, numbers of people tested for HIV, and baseline HIV prevalence. RESULTS: Mean (across all MSAs) trends over time suggested decreases through 2002 (from approximately 11.4% in 1992 to 9.2% in 2002), followed by a period of stability, and steep increases after 2010 (to 10.6% in 2013). Validation analyses found a moderate positive correlation between our estimates and ARV prescription volumes (r = 0.45), and a very strong positive correlation (r = 0.94) between our estimates and previous estimates by Tempalski et al. (2009) for 1992-2002 (which used different methods). Analysis by region and baseline prevalence suggested that mean increases in later years were largely driven by MSAs in the Western United States and by MSAs in the Midwest that had low baseline prevalence. Our estimates suggest that prevalence decreased across all years in the Eastern United States. These trends were particularly clear when MSAs with very low numbers of people tested for HIV were removed from analyses to reduce unexplained variability in mean trajectories. CONCLUSIONS: Our estimates suggest a fairly large degree of variation in 1992-2013 trajectories of PWID HIV prevalence among 89 US MSAs, particularly by geographic region. They suggest that public health responses in many MSAs (particularly those with larger HIV prevalence among PWID in the early 1990s) were sufficient to decrease or maintain HIV prevalence over time. However, future research should investigate potential factors driving the estimated increase in prevalence after 2002 MSAs in the West and Midwest. These findings have potentially important implications for program and/or policy decisions, but estimates for MSAs with low HIV testing denominators should be interpreted with caution and verified locally before planning action.
PURPOSE: After years of stable or declining HIV prevalence and declining incidence among people who inject drugs (PWID) in the United States, some rapidly emerging outbreaks have recently occurred in new areas (e.g., Scott County, Indiana). However, to our knowledge, trends over time in HIV prevalence among PWID in US metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) across all major regions of the country have not been systematically estimated beyond 2002, and the extent to which HIV prevalence may be increasing in other areas is largely unknown. This article estimates HIV prevalence among PWID in 89 of the most populated US MSAs, both overall and by geographic region, using more recent surveillance and HIV testing data. METHODS: We computed MSA-specific annual estimates of HIV prevalence (both diagnosed and undiagnosed infections) among PWID for these 89 MSAs, for 1992-2013, using several data series from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) National HIV Surveillance System and National HIV Prevention Monitoring and Evaluation data; Holmberg's (1997) estimates of 1992 PWID population size and of HIV prevalence and incidence among PWID; and research estimates from published literature using 1992-2013 data. A mixed effects model, with time nested within MSAs, was used to regress the literature review estimates on all of the other data series. Multiple imputation was used to address missing data. Resulting estimates were validated using previous 1992-2002 estimates of HIV prevalence and data on antiretroviral (ARV) prescription volumes and examined for patterns based on geographic region, numbers of people tested for HIV, and baseline HIV prevalence. RESULTS: Mean (across all MSAs) trends over time suggested decreases through 2002 (from approximately 11.4% in 1992 to 9.2% in 2002), followed by a period of stability, and steep increases after 2010 (to 10.6% in 2013). Validation analyses found a moderate positive correlation between our estimates and ARV prescription volumes (r = 0.45), and a very strong positive correlation (r = 0.94) between our estimates and previous estimates by Tempalski et al. (2009) for 1992-2002 (which used different methods). Analysis by region and baseline prevalence suggested that mean increases in later years were largely driven by MSAs in the Western United States and by MSAs in the Midwest that had low baseline prevalence. Our estimates suggest that prevalence decreased across all years in the Eastern United States. These trends were particularly clear when MSAs with very low numbers of people tested for HIV were removed from analyses to reduce unexplained variability in mean trajectories. CONCLUSIONS: Our estimates suggest a fairly large degree of variation in 1992-2013 trajectories of PWID HIV prevalence among 89 US MSAs, particularly by geographic region. They suggest that public health responses in many MSAs (particularly those with larger HIV prevalence among PWID in the early 1990s) were sufficient to decrease or maintain HIV prevalence over time. However, future research should investigate potential factors driving the estimated increase in prevalence after 2002 MSAs in the West and Midwest. These findings have potentially important implications for program and/or policy decisions, but estimates for MSAs with low HIV testing denominators should be interpreted with caution and verified locally before planning action.
Authors: Samuel R Friedman; Barbara Tempalski; Joanne E Brady; Judith J Friedman; Hannah L F Cooper; Peter L Flom; Moriah M McGrath; Karla Gostnell; Don C Des Jarlais Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2006-12-01
Authors: Barbara Tempalski; Spencer Lieb; Charles M Cleland; Hannah Cooper; Joanne E Brady; Samuel R Friedman Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2008-11-18 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Michelle M Van Handel; Charles E Rose; Elaine J Hallisey; Jessica L Kolling; Jon E Zibbell; Brian Lewis; Michele K Bohm; Christopher M Jones; Barry E Flanagan; Azfar-E-Alam Siddiqi; Kashif Iqbal; Andrew L Dent; Jonathan H Mermin; Eugene McCray; John W Ward; John T Brooks Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Samuel R Friedman; Barbara Tempalski; Joanne E Brady; Brooke S West; Enrique R Pouget; Leslie D Williams; Don C Des Jarlais; Hannah L F Cooper Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2016-03-11
Authors: Philip J Peters; Pamela Pontones; Karen W Hoover; Monita R Patel; Romeo R Galang; Jessica Shields; Sara J Blosser; Michael W Spiller; Brittany Combs; William M Switzer; Caitlin Conrad; Jessica Gentry; Yury Khudyakov; Dorothy Waterhouse; S Michele Owen; Erika Chapman; Jeremy C Roseberry; Veronica McCants; Paul J Weidle; Dita Broz; Taraz Samandari; Jonathan Mermin; Jennifer Walthall; John T Brooks; Joan M Duwve Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-07-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Georgios K Nikolopoulos; Anastasios Fotiou; Eleftheria Kanavou; Clive Richardson; Marios Detsis; Anastasia Pharris; Jonathan E Suk; Jan C Semenza; Claudia Costa-Storti; Dimitrios Paraskevis; Vana Sypsa; Melpomeni-Minerva Malliori; Samuel R Friedman; Angelos Hatzakis Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Leslie D Williams; Barbara Tempalski; H Irene Hall; Anna Satcher Johnson; Guoshen Wang; Samuel R Friedman Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2021-08-22 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Leslie D Williams; Ronald Stall; Barbara Tempalski; Kevin Jefferson; Justin Smith; Umedjon Ibragimov; H Irene Hall; Anna Satcher Johnson; Guoshen Wang; David W Purcell; Hannah L F Cooper; Samuel R Friedman Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2020-09-18 Impact factor: 3.797