| Literature DB >> 32438043 |
Uday Popat1, Rohtesh S Mehta2, Roland Bassett3, Piyanuch Kongtim4, Julianne Chen2, Amin M Alousi2, Paolo Anderlini2, Stefan Ciurea2, Chitra Hosing2, Roy Jones2, Partow Kebriaei2, Issa Khouri2, Richard Lindsay2, Yago Nieto2, Amanda Olson2, Betul Oran2, Muzaffar H Qazilbash2, Gabriela Rondon2, Elizabeth J Shpall2, Srdan Verstovsek2, Borje S Andersson2, Richard E Champlin2.
Abstract
Optimal conditioning regimens for older patients with myelofibrosis undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant are not known. Likewise, the role of dose intensity is not clear. We conducted a nonrandomized, prospective, phase II trial using low-dose, later escalated to high-dose (myeloablative conditioning), busulfan with fludarabine (Bu-Flu) in myelofibrosis patients up to age 74 years. The first 15 patients received i.v. busulfan 130 mg/m2/day on days -3 and -2 ("low dose"); 31 patients received high-dose conditioning, either 100 mg/m2/day (days -5 to -2; n = 4) or pharmacokinetic-guided area under the curve of 4000 μmol/min (days -5 to -2; n = 27). The primary endpoint was day 100 nonrelapse mortality (NRM). Median age was 58 years (interquartile range [IQR], 53-63). Dynamic international prognostic scoring system-plus was intermediate (n = 28) or high (n = 18). Donors were related (n = 19) or unrelated (n = 27). Cumulative incidence of NRM was 9.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0-20.3) at day 100 and at 3 years in the high-dose group and 0% in the low-dose group at day 100, which increased to 20% (95% CI, 0-41.9) at 3 years. With a median follow-up of 5.1 years (IQR, 3.8-6), 3-year relapse was 32.3% (95% CI, 15.4-49.1) in high dose versus 53.3% (95% CI, 26.6-80.1) in low dose. Event-free survival was 58% (95% CI, 43-78) versus 27% (95% CI, 12-62), and overall survival was 74% (95% CI, 60-91) versus 60% (95% CI, 40-91). In multivariate analysis, high-dose busulfan had a trend toward lower relapse (hazard ratio, .44; 95% CI, .18-1.07; P = .07), with no impact on NRM. Intensifying the Bu-Flu regimen using pharmacokinetic-monitoring appears to be promising in reducing relapse without increasing NRM.Entities:
Keywords: Myelofibrosis; myeloablative; reduced intensity; stem cell transplant
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32438043 PMCID: PMC7547798 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.03.020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ISSN: 1083-8791 Impact factor: 5.742