Literature DB >> 32438043

Optimizing the Conditioning Regimen for Hematopoietic Cell Transplant in Myelofibrosis: Long-Term Results of a Prospective Phase II Clinical Trial.

Uday Popat1, Rohtesh S Mehta2, Roland Bassett3, Piyanuch Kongtim4, Julianne Chen2, Amin M Alousi2, Paolo Anderlini2, Stefan Ciurea2, Chitra Hosing2, Roy Jones2, Partow Kebriaei2, Issa Khouri2, Richard Lindsay2, Yago Nieto2, Amanda Olson2, Betul Oran2, Muzaffar H Qazilbash2, Gabriela Rondon2, Elizabeth J Shpall2, Srdan Verstovsek2, Borje S Andersson2, Richard E Champlin2.   

Abstract

Optimal conditioning regimens for older patients with myelofibrosis undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant are not known. Likewise, the role of dose intensity is not clear. We conducted a nonrandomized, prospective, phase II trial using low-dose, later escalated to high-dose (myeloablative conditioning), busulfan with fludarabine (Bu-Flu) in myelofibrosis patients up to age 74 years. The first 15 patients received i.v. busulfan 130 mg/m2/day on days -3 and -2 ("low dose"); 31 patients received high-dose conditioning, either 100 mg/m2/day (days -5 to -2; n = 4) or pharmacokinetic-guided area under the curve of 4000 μmol/min (days -5 to -2; n = 27). The primary endpoint was day 100 nonrelapse mortality (NRM). Median age was 58 years (interquartile range [IQR], 53-63). Dynamic international prognostic scoring system-plus was intermediate (n = 28) or high (n = 18). Donors were related (n = 19) or unrelated (n = 27). Cumulative incidence of NRM was 9.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0-20.3) at day 100 and at 3 years in the high-dose group and 0% in the low-dose group at day 100, which increased to 20% (95% CI, 0-41.9) at 3 years. With a median follow-up of 5.1 years (IQR, 3.8-6), 3-year relapse was 32.3% (95% CI, 15.4-49.1) in high dose versus 53.3% (95% CI, 26.6-80.1) in low dose. Event-free survival was 58% (95% CI, 43-78) versus 27% (95% CI, 12-62), and overall survival was 74% (95% CI, 60-91) versus 60% (95% CI, 40-91). In multivariate analysis, high-dose busulfan had a trend toward lower relapse (hazard ratio, .44; 95% CI, .18-1.07; P = .07), with no impact on NRM. Intensifying the Bu-Flu regimen using pharmacokinetic-monitoring appears to be promising in reducing relapse without increasing NRM.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Myelofibrosis; myeloablative; reduced intensity; stem cell transplant

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32438043      PMCID: PMC7547798          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.03.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  37 in total

1.  Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)-specific comorbidity index: a new tool for risk assessment before allogeneic HCT.

Authors:  Mohamed L Sorror; Michael B Maris; Rainer Storb; Frederic Baron; Brenda M Sandmaier; David G Maloney; Barry Storer
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis: a report of the Société Française de Greffe de Moelle et de Thérapie Cellulaire (SFGM-TC).

Authors:  Marie Robin; Reza Tabrizi; Mohamad Mohty; Sabine Furst; Mauricette Michallet; Jacques-Olivier Bay; Jean-Yves Cahn; Eric De Coninck; Nathalie Dhedin; Marc Bernard; Bernard Rio; Agnès Buzyn; Anne Huynh; Karin Bilger; Pierre Bordigoni; Nathalie Contentin; Raphaël Porcher; Gérard Socié; Noel Milpied
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 6.998

3.  The outcome of allo-HSCT for 92 patients with myelofibrosis in the Nordic countries.

Authors:  J Abelsson; M Merup; G Birgegård; O WeisBjerrum; L Brinch; M Brune; P Johansson; M Kauppila; S Lenhoff; M Liljeholm; C Malm; K Remes; L Vindelöv; B Andréasson
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 5.483

4.  The Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System for myelofibrosis predicts outcomes after hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Authors:  Bart L Scott; Ted A Gooley; Mohamed L Sorror; Andrew R Rezvani; Michael L Linenberger; Jonathan Grim; Brenda M Sandmaier; David Myerson; Thomas R Chauncey; Rainer Storb; Veronika Buxhofer-Ausch; Jerald P Radich; Frederick R Appelbaum; H Joachim Deeg
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Hematopoietic cell transplantation as curative therapy for idiopathic myelofibrosis, advanced polycythemia vera, and essential thrombocythemia.

Authors:  Daniella M B Kerbauy; Theodore A Gooley; George E Sale; Mary E D Flowers; Kristine C Doney; George E Georges; Joanne E Greene; Michael Linenberger; Effie Petersdorf; Brenda M Sandmaier; Bart L Scott; Mohamed Sorror; Derek L Stirewalt; F Marc Stewart; Robert P Witherspoon; Rainer Storb; Frederick R Appelbaum; H Joachim Deeg
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  MPD-RC 101 prospective study of reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Damiano Rondelli; Judith D Goldberg; Luis Isola; Leah S Price; Tsiporah B Shore; Michael Boyer; Andrea Bacigalupo; Alessandro Rambaldi; Marco Scarano; Rebecca B Klisovic; Vikas Gupta; Bjorn Andreasson; John Mascarenhas; Meir Wetzler; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Josef T Prchal; Vesna Najfeld; Attilio Orazi; Rona S Weinberg; Crystal Miller; Giovanni Barosi; Lewis R Silverman; Giuseppe Prosperini; Roberto Marchioli; Ronald Hoffman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Outcome of transplantation for myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Karen K Ballen; Smriti Shrestha; Kathleen A Sobocinski; Mei-Jie Zhang; Asad Bashey; Brian J Bolwell; Francisco Cervantes; Steven M Devine; Robert Peter Gale; Vikas Gupta; Theresa E Hahn; William J Hogan; Nicolaus Kröger; Mark R Litzow; David I Marks; Richard T Maziarz; Philip L McCarthy; Gary Schiller; Harry C Schouten; Vivek Roy; Peter H Wiernik; Mary M Horowitz; Sergio A Giralt; Mukta Arora
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis: a report from two Canadian centers.

Authors:  A Daly; K Song; T Nevill; S Nantel; C Toze; D Hogge; D Forrest; J Lavoie; H Sutherland; J Shepherd; W Hasegawa; J Lipton; H Messner; T Kiss
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 9.  1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading.

Authors:  D Przepiorka; D Weisdorf; P Martin; H G Klingemann; P Beatty; J Hows; E D Thomas
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.483

10.  Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis.

Authors:  H Joachim Deeg; Theodore A Gooley; Mary E D Flowers; George E Sale; John T Slattery; Claudio Anasetti; Thomas R Chauncey; Kristine Doney; George E Georges; Hans-Peter Kiem; Paul J Martin; Effie W Petersdorf; Jerald Radich; Jean E Sanders; Brenda M Sandmaier; E Houston Warren; Robert P Witherspoon; Rainer Storb; Frederick R Appelbaum
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-08-14       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  1 in total

1.  Population Pharmacokinetics of Busulfan and Its Metabolite Sulfolane in Patients with Myelofibrosis Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Adrin Dadkhah; Sebastian Georg Wicha; Nicolaus Kröger; Alexander Müller; Christoph Pfaffendorf; Maria Riedner; Anita Badbaran; Boris Fehse; Claudia Langebrake
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 6.525

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.