Literature DB >> 32438017

Direct comparison of a novel antitachycardia pacing algorithm against present methods using virtual patient modeling.

Darrell J Swenson1, Robert T Taepke2, Josh J E Blauer2, Eugene Kwan3, Elyar Ghafoori4, Gernot Plank5, Edward Vigmond6, Rob S MacLeod3, Paul DeGroot2, Ravi Ranjan7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antitachycardia pacing (ATP) success rates as low as 50% for fast ventricular tachycardias (VTs) have been reported, providing an opportunity for improved ATP to decrease shocks.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine how a new automated antitachycardia pacing (AATP) therapy would perform compared with traditional burst ATP using computer modeling to conduct a virtual study.
METHODS: Virtual patient scenarios were constructed from magnetic resonance imaging and electrophysiological (EP) data. Cardiac EP simulation software (CARPEntry) was used to generate reentrant VT. Simulated VT exit sites were physician adjudicated against corresponding clinical 12-lead electrocardiograms. Burst ATP comprised 3 sequences of 8 pulses at 88% of VT cycle length, with each sequence decremented by 10 ms. AATP was limited to 3 sequences, with each sequence learning from the previous sequences.
RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-nine unique ATP scenarios were generated from 7 unique scared hearts. Burst ATP terminated 145 of 259 VTs (56%) and accelerated 2.0%. AATP terminated 189 of 259 VTs (73%) with the same acceleration rate. The 2 dominant ATP failure mechanisms were identified as (1) insufficient prematurity to close the excitable gap; and (2) failure to reach the critical isthmus of the VT. AATP reduced failures in these categories from 101 to 63 (44% reduction) without increasing acceleration.
CONCLUSION: AATP successfully adapted ATP sequences to terminate VT episodes that burst ATP failed to terminate. AATP was successful, with complex scar geometries and EP heterogeneity as seen in the real world.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antitachycardia pacing; Computational cardiac electrophysiology; Monomorphic ventricular tachycardia; Self-adapting algorithms; Virtual patient

Year:  2020        PMID: 32438017     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  5 in total

1.  Effectiveness of changing conventional implantable cardioverter-defibrillator settings to intrinsic antitachycardia pacing-like settings in the treatment of ventricular tachycardia in patients with cardiac failure.

Authors:  Motomi Tachibana; Akihiro Hayashida; Kimikazu Banba; Masahisa Arimichi; Yoshimasa Tsushima; Atsushi Hirohata
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2022-02-22

2.  An in-silico assessment of efficacy of two novel intra-cardiac electrode configurations versus traditional anti-tachycardia pacing therapy for terminating sustained ventricular tachycardia.

Authors:  Shuang Qian; Adam Connolly; Caroline Mendonca-Costa; Fernando Campos; Steven E Williams; John Whitaker; Christopher A Rinaldi; Martin J Bishop
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 4.589

3.  Intrinsic anti-tachycardia pacing terminated ventricular tachycardia resistant to traditional anti-tachycardia pacing.

Authors:  Hikaru Hagiwara; Masaya Watanabe; Rui Kamada; Toshihisa Anzai
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2022-01-03

4.  Reverse RAMP (REVRAMP) pacing: A novel anti tachycardia pacing technique.

Authors:  Muzahir Hassan Tayebjee; Robert Bowes; Berthold Stegemann; Arun V Holden
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2021-11-12

5.  Automatic adjustment of ventricular antitachycardia pacing and individualized device therapy.

Authors:  Rajiv Tripathi; Christopher Gubran; Craig Jeavons
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2021-12-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.