Armin H Paravlic1, David Tod2, Zoran Milanovic3. 1. Science and Research Centre, Institute for Kinesiology Research, Koper, Slovenia. Electronic address: armin.paravlic@zrs-kp.si. 2. School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom. 3. Science and Research Centre, Institute for Kinesiology Research, Koper, Slovenia; Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Niš, Niš, Serbia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of mental simulation practice (MSP) on measures of physical function recovery in patients who have undergone a joint replacement surgery of lower limbs. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review was conducted using CINAHL, PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, SPORTDiscus, PEDro, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar from the earliest record until August 16, 2019. STUDY SELECTION: The following inclusion criteria were used to determine eligibility for studies: (1) randomized and matched controlled trials recruiting men and women who underwent primary unilateral joint arthroplasty; (2) the study examined the effects of MSP intervention on measures of physical function recovery (both performance-based and patient self-reported); and (3) measures of interest were compared between MSP and control groups. A total of 8 papers (7 studies) met the inclusion criteria and were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted by 1 reviewer and checked by a second reviewer, independently. DATA SYNTHESIS: When compared with standard physical therapy (SPT), MSP showed an effect on physical function in general (effect size [ES], 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-0.96; n=7), maximal voluntary strength of knee extensor muscles of the affected leg (ES, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.64-2.18; n=2), brisk walking speed (ES, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.58-1.83; n=2), brisk walking speed with dual task (ES, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.41-1.63; n=2), timed up-to go test (ES, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.15-1.77; n=3), and active flexion of the affected leg (ES, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.29-1.11; n=4). Finally, meta-regression analysis revealed that the effects of MSP were significantly predicted only by total number of training sessions per study. CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis demonstrated that MSP intervention has multiple positive effects on measures of physical function recovery in patients who have undergone total knee or hip replacement surgery in comparison with SPT. Thus, MSP can be applied as an effective complementary therapy to SPT in physical rehabilitation of this specific population, especially in the early postacute and acute phase.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of mental simulation practice (MSP) on measures of physical function recovery in patients who have undergone a joint replacement surgery of lower limbs. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review was conducted using CINAHL, PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, SPORTDiscus, PEDro, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar from the earliest record until August 16, 2019. STUDY SELECTION: The following inclusion criteria were used to determine eligibility for studies: (1) randomized and matched controlled trials recruiting men and women who underwent primary unilateral joint arthroplasty; (2) the study examined the effects of MSP intervention on measures of physical function recovery (both performance-based and patient self-reported); and (3) measures of interest were compared between MSP and control groups. A total of 8 papers (7 studies) met the inclusion criteria and were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted by 1 reviewer and checked by a second reviewer, independently. DATA SYNTHESIS: When compared with standard physical therapy (SPT), MSP showed an effect on physical function in general (effect size [ES], 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-0.96; n=7), maximal voluntary strength of knee extensor muscles of the affected leg (ES, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.64-2.18; n=2), brisk walking speed (ES, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.58-1.83; n=2), brisk walking speed with dual task (ES, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.41-1.63; n=2), timed up-to go test (ES, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.15-1.77; n=3), and active flexion of the affected leg (ES, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.29-1.11; n=4). Finally, meta-regression analysis revealed that the effects of MSP were significantly predicted only by total number of training sessions per study. CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis demonstrated that MSP intervention has multiple positive effects on measures of physical function recovery in patients who have undergone total knee or hip replacement surgery in comparison with SPT. Thus, MSP can be applied as an effective complementary therapy to SPT in physical rehabilitation of this specific population, especially in the early postacute and acute phase.