Literature DB >> 32437566

Impact of Meal Frequency on Anthropometric Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Lukas Schwingshackl1, Kai Nitschke1, Jasmin Zähringer1, Karin Bischoff1, Szimonetta Lohner2, Gabriel Torbahn3, Sabrina Schlesinger4, Christine Schmucker1, Joerg J Meerpohl1,5.   

Abstract

The relation between meal frequency and measures of obesity is inconclusive. Therefore, this systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) set out to compare the isocaloric effects of different meal frequencies on anthropometric outcomes and energy intake (EI). A systematic literature search was conducted in 3 electronic databases (Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science; search date, 11 March 2019). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included with ≥2 wk intervention duration comparing any 2 of the eligible isocaloric meal frequencies (i.e., 1 to ≥8 meals/d). Random-effects NMA was performed for 4 outcomes [body weight (BW), waist circumference (WC), fat mass (FM), and EI], and surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was estimated using a frequentist approach (P-score: value is between 0 and 1). Twenty-two RCTs with 647 participants were included. Our results suggest that 2 meals/d probably slightly reduces BW compared with 3 meals/d [mean difference (MD): -1.02 kg; 95% CI: -1.70, -0.35 kg) or 6 meals/d (MD: -1.29 kg; 95% CI: -1.74, -0.84 kg; moderate certainty of evidence). We are uncertain whether 1 or 2 meals/d reduces BW compared with ≥8 meals/d (MD1 meal/d vs. ≥8 meals/d: -2.25 kg; 95% CI: -5.13, 0.63 kg; MD2 meals/d vs. ≥8 meals/d: -1.32 kg; 95% CI: -2.19, -0.45 kg) and whether 1 meal/d probably reduces FM compared with 3 meals/d (MD: -1.84 kg; 95% CI: -3.72, 0.05 kg; very low certainty of evidence). Two meals per day compared with 6 meals/d probably reduce WC (MD: -3.77 cm; 95% CI: -4.68, -2.86 cm; moderate certainty of evidence). One meal per day was ranked as the best frequency for reducing BW (P-score: 0.81), followed by 2 meals/d (P-score: 0.74), whereas 2 meals/d performed best for WC (P-score: 0.96). EI was not affected by meal frequency. In conclusion, our findings indicate that there is little robust evidence that reducing meal frequency is beneficial.
Copyright © The Author(s) on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  meal frequency; network meta-analysis; obesity; snacking; weight loss

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32437566      PMCID: PMC7490164          DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmaa056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Nutr        ISSN: 2161-8313            Impact factor:   8.701


  50 in total

1.  A high eating frequency is associated with an overall healthy lifestyle in middle-aged men and women and reduced likelihood of general and central obesity in men.

Authors:  Isabel Holmbäck; Ulrika Ericson; Bo Gullberg; Elisabet Wirfält
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.718

2.  Effect of meal frequency on glucose and insulin levels in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomised trial.

Authors:  E Papakonstantinou; I Kechribari; P Mitrou; E Trakakis; D Vassiliadi; E Georgousopoulou; A Zampelas; M D Kontogianni; G Dimitriadis
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 3.  Effects of meal frequency on weight loss and body composition: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Brad Jon Schoenfeld; Alan Albert Aragon; James W Krieger
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 7.110

4.  Frequency of feeding, weight reduction, and body composition.

Authors:  C M Young; S S Scanlan; C M Topping; V Simko; L Lutwak
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  1971-11

Review 5.  Highlighting the positive impact of increasing feeding frequency on metabolism and weight management.

Authors:  Jeanine Louis-Sylvestre; Anne Lluch; Françoise Neant; John E Blundell
Journal:  Forum Nutr       Date:  2003

6.  Metabolic effects of alterations in meal frequency in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  L Arnold; J I Mann; M J Ball
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Increased meal frequency does not promote greater weight loss in subjects who were prescribed an 8-week equi-energetic energy-restricted diet.

Authors:  Jameason D Cameron; Marie-Josée Cyr; Eric Doucet
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 3.718

8.  Effect of nibbling versus gorging on cardiovascular risk factors: serum uric acid and blood lipids.

Authors:  D J Jenkins; A Khan; A L Jenkins; R Illingworth; A S Pappu; T M Wolever; V Vuksan; G Buckley; A V Rao; S C Cunnane
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 8.694

9.  Metabolic effects of alterations in meal frequency in hypercholesterolaemic individuals.

Authors:  L Arnold; M Ball; J Mann
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.162

10.  The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations.

Authors:  Brian Hutton; Georgia Salanti; Deborah M Caldwell; Anna Chaimani; Christopher H Schmid; Chris Cameron; John P A Ioannidis; Sharon Straus; Kristian Thorlund; Jeroen P Jansen; Cynthia Mulrow; Ferrán Catalá-López; Peter C Gøtzsche; Kay Dickersin; Isabelle Boutron; Douglas G Altman; David Moher
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Ten things to know about ten cardiovascular disease risk factors - 2022.

Authors:  Harold E Bays; Anandita Kulkarni; Charles German; Priyanka Satish; Adedapo Iluyomade; Ramzi Dudum; Aarti Thakkar; Mahmoud Al Rifai; Anurag Mehta; Aneesha Thobani; Yousif Al-Saiegh; Adam J Nelson; Samip Sheth; Peter P Toth
Journal:  Am J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2022-04-06

2.  Letter to the Editor on "Comparing the Effects of Docosahexaenoic and Eicosapentaenoic Acids on Inflammation Markers Using Pairwise and Network Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials".

Authors:  Jakub Morze; Lukas Schwingshackl
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 8.701

3.  Meal frequency and incidence of type 2 diabetes: a prospective study.

Authors:  Xiaowen Wang; Yonghua Hu; Li-Qiang Qin; Jia-Yi Dong
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 4.125

4.  Effect of lunch with different calorie and nutrient balances on dinner-induced postprandial glucose variability.

Authors:  Mai Kuwahara; Hyeon-Ki Kim; Akiko Furutani; Yui Mineshita; Takashi Nakaoka; Shigenobu Shibata
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  The Effect of Four Weeks Dietary Intervention with 8-Hour Time-Restricted Eating on Body Composition and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Young Adults.

Authors:  Su-Jeong Park; Jae-Won Yang; Yoon-Ju Song
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  Meal patterns associated with energy intake in people with obesity.

Authors:  Cathrine Horn; Johnny Laupsa-Borge; Amanda I O Andersen; Laurence Dyer; Ingrid Revheim; Trine Leikanger; Nicole Tandrevold Næsheim; Inghild Storås; Kristine Kjerpeseth Johannessen; Gunnar Mellgren; Jutta Dierkes; Simon N Dankel
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 4.125

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.