Chun-Shuang Guan1, Lian-Gui Wei1, Ru-Ming Xie2, Zhi-Bin Lv2, Shuo Yan2, Zi-Xin Zhang2, Bu-Dong Chen2. 1. Department of Radiology, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China;Chun-Shuang Guan and Lian-Gui Wei contributed equally to this work. 2. Department of Radiology, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We aimed to retrospectively analyze the imaging changes detected in the follow-up of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients on thin-section computed tomography (CT). METHODS: We included 54 patients diagnosed with COVID-19. The mean interval between the initial and follow-up CT scans was 7.82±3.74 days. Patients were divided into progression and recovery groups according to their outcomes. We evaluated CT images in terms of distribution of lesions and imaging manifestations. The manifestations included ground-glass opacity (GGO), crazy-paving pattern, consolidation, irregular line, and air bronchogram sign. RESULTS: COVID-19 lesions showed mainly subpleural distribution, which was accompanied by bronchovascular bundle distribution in nearly 30% of the patients. The lower lobes of both lungs were the most commonly involved. In the follow-up, the progression group showed more involvement of the upper lobe of the left lung than the recovery group. GGO was the most common sign. As the disease progressed, round GGO decreased and patchy GGO increased. On follow-up CT, consolidation increased in the progression group while decreasing in the recovery group. Air bronchogram sign was more commonly observed at the initial examination (90.9%) than at follow-up (30%) in the recovery group, but there was no significant change in the progression group. Pleural effusion and lymphadenopathy were absent in the initial examination, but pleural effusion was observed in three cases after follow-up. CONCLUSION: As COVID-19 progressed, round GGOs tended to evolve into patchy GGOs, consolidation increased, and pleural effusion could be occasionally observed. As COVID-19 resolved, the crazy-paving pattern and air bronchogram significantly decreased.
PURPOSE: We aimed to retrospectively analyze the imaging changes detected in the follow-up of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients on thin-section computed tomography (CT). METHODS: We included 54 patients diagnosed with COVID-19. The mean interval between the initial and follow-up CT scans was 7.82±3.74 days. Patients were divided into progression and recovery groups according to their outcomes. We evaluated CT images in terms of distribution of lesions and imaging manifestations. The manifestations included ground-glass opacity (GGO), crazy-paving pattern, consolidation, irregular line, and air bronchogram sign. RESULTS:COVID-19 lesions showed mainly subpleural distribution, which was accompanied by bronchovascular bundle distribution in nearly 30% of the patients. The lower lobes of both lungs were the most commonly involved. In the follow-up, the progression group showed more involvement of the upper lobe of the left lung than the recovery group. GGO was the most common sign. As the disease progressed, round GGO decreased and patchy GGO increased. On follow-up CT, consolidation increased in the progression group while decreasing in the recovery group. Air bronchogram sign was more commonly observed at the initial examination (90.9%) than at follow-up (30%) in the recovery group, but there was no significant change in the progression group. Pleural effusion and lymphadenopathy were absent in the initial examination, but pleural effusion was observed in three cases after follow-up. CONCLUSION: As COVID-19 progressed, round GGOs tended to evolve into patchy GGOs, consolidation increased, and pleural effusion could be occasionally observed. As COVID-19 resolved, the crazy-paving pattern and air bronchogram significantly decreased.
Authors: David M Hansell; Alexander A Bankier; Heber MacMahon; Theresa C McLoud; Nestor L Müller; Jacques Remy Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-01-14 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Karuna M Das; Edward Y Lee; Mushira A Enani; Suhaila E AlJawder; Rajvir Singh; Salman Bashir; Nizar Al-Nakshbandi; Khalid AlDossari; Sven G Larsson Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2015-01-23 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Christopher M Booth; Larissa M Matukas; George A Tomlinson; Anita R Rachlis; David B Rose; Hy A Dwosh; Sharon L Walmsley; Tony Mazzulli; Monica Avendano; Peter Derkach; Issa E Ephtimios; Ian Kitai; Barbara D Mederski; Steven B Shadowitz; Wayne L Gold; Laura A Hawryluck; Elizabeth Rea; Jordan S Chenkin; David W Cescon; Susan M Poutanen; Allan S Detsky Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-05-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: K T Wong; Gregory E Antonio; David S C Hui; Nelson Lee; Edmund H Y Yuen; Alan Wu; C B Leung; T H Rainer; Peter Cameron; Sydney S C Chung; Joseph J Y Sung; Anil T Ahuja Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-05-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Adam Bernheim; Xueyan Mei; Mingqian Huang; Yang Yang; Zahi A Fayad; Ning Zhang; Kaiyue Diao; Bin Lin; Xiqi Zhu; Kunwei Li; Shaolin Li; Hong Shan; Adam Jacobi; Michael Chung Journal: Radiology Date: 2020-02-20 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: J S M Peiris; C M Chu; V C C Cheng; K S Chan; I F N Hung; L L M Poon; K I Law; B S F Tang; T Y W Hon; C S Chan; K H Chan; J S C Ng; B J Zheng; W L Ng; R W M Lai; Y Guan; K Y Yuen Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-05-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Abdullah Assiri; Jaffar A Al-Tawfiq; Abdullah A Al-Rabeeah; Fahad A Al-Rabiah; Sami Al-Hajjar; Ali Al-Barrak; Hesham Flemban; Wafa N Al-Nassir; Hanan H Balkhy; Rafat F Al-Hakeem; Hatem Q Makhdoom; Alimuddin I Zumla; Ziad A Memish Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2013-07-26 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: K L E Hon; C W Leung; W T F Cheng; P K S Chan; W C W Chu; Y W Kwan; A M Li; N C Fong; P C Ng; M C Chiu; C K Li; J S Tam; T F Fok Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-05-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Rishi Philip Mathew; Merin Jose; Vinayak Jayaram; Paul Joy; Danny George; Maria Joseph; Teena Sleeba; Ajith Toms Journal: World J Radiol Date: 2020-12-28