| Literature DB >> 32436212 |
Mary Gleeson1,2, Nicholas Counsell3, David Cunningham1, Anthony Lawrie3, Laura Clifton-Hadley3, Eliza Hawkes4,5, Andrew McMillan6, Kirit M Ardeshna7,8, Cathy Burton9, Nick Chadwick3, Joanna Gambell3, Paul Smith3, Paul Mouncey3, Christopher Pocock10, John Radford11, John Davies12, Deborah Turner13, Anton Kruger14, Peter Johnson15, David Linch7.
Abstract
We compared the International Prognostic Index (IPI), Revised (R)-IPI and age-adjusted (aa)-IPI as prognostic indices for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the UK National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) R-CHOP 14 versus 21 trial (N = 1080). The R-IPI and aa-IPI showed no marked improvement compared to the IPI for overall and progression-free survival, in terms of model fit or discrimination. Similar results were observed in exploratory analyses incorporating the Grupo Español de Linfomas/Transplante de Médula Ósea (GELTAMO)-IPI, where baseline β2-microglobulin data were available (N = 655). Although our findings support current use of the IPI, a novel prognostic tool to better delineate a high-risk DLBCL group in the rituximab era is needed.Entities:
Keywords: clinical trials; diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; international prognostic index; rituximab
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32436212 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.16691
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Haematol ISSN: 0007-1048 Impact factor: 6.998