| Literature DB >> 32435295 |
Olli Peltoniemi1, Stefan Björkman1, Marianne Oropeza-Moe2, Claudio Oliviero1.
Abstract
This review aims to describe changes in production environment, management tools and technology to alleviate problems seen with the present hyperprolific sow model. Successful parturition in the pig includes the possibility to express adequate maternal behaviour, rapid expulsion of piglets, complete expulsion of placenta, elimination of uterine contamination and debris, neonatal activity and colostrum intake. We focus on management of large litters, including maternal behaviour, ease of parturition, colostrum production, piglet quality parameters and intermittent suckling. There are also some interesting developments in technology to assess colostrum and immune state of the piglet. These developments may be utilized to improve the success rate of reproductive management around farrowing, lactation and after weaning. We also discuss new insights in how to examine the health of the mammary gland, uterus and ovaries of hyperprolific sows. Finally, we assess the latest developments on breeding and technology of hyperprolific sows, including artificial insemination (AI), real-time ultrasound of the genital tract and embryo transfer (ET). We conclude that 1) for the sow to produce sufficient colostrum, both the behavioural and physiological needs of the sow need to be met before and after parturition. Furthermore, 2) new ultrasound and biopsy technology can be effectively applied for accurate diagnosis of inflammatory processes of the udder and uterus and timing of AI regarding ovulation to improve insemination efficiency. Finally, 3) developments in cryopreservation of germ cells and embryos appear promising but lack of valid oocyte collection techniques and nonsurgical ET techniques are a bottleneck to commercial ET. These latest developments in management of parturition and reproductive technology are necessary to cope with the increasing challenges associated with very large litter sizes.Entities:
Keywords: biotechnology; large litter; management; piglet; sow
Year: 2019 PMID: 32435295 PMCID: PMC7234181 DOI: 10.21451/1984-3143-AR2019-0055
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anim Reprod ISSN: 1806-9614 Impact factor: 1.807
Brix value categories to estimate sow colostrum IgG content according to Hasan et al. (2016). This interpretation scale is valid if the sample is obtained within 0-3 hours from the start of farrowing using a Brix refractometer with a scale range 0-53% (adapted from Hasan ).
| Brix % | IgG estimation categories |
|---|---|
| < 20 | Poor |
| 20-24 | Borderlinea |
| 25-29 | Adequate |
| ≥ 30 | Very good |
The category “Borderline” should not always be considered to estimate a not adequate IgG content, especially if the found Brix values are on the highest range of this category (23-24%), on the contrary levels falling at the lowest range of this category (20-21%) can be considered not optimal. Taking another sample, after 1-2 h, can allow better interpretation of the results, to see if the development of the estimated IgG content is stable, increasing or decreasing from the initial value (Hasan ). In conclusion, IgG can be considered as a reliable indicator of colostrum quality. Use of Brix refractometers provide an effective tool to assess colostrum quality, which is essential in the management of a large litter.
Figure 1Ultrasound images of a mammary gland of a healthy sow (A) and from sows with from severe udder oedema (B-C). These images show thickened dermal and subdermal tissues (B, C), hyperechoic lobuloalveolar tissue (B, C) with enlarged blood vessels (C) and severe shadowing (D) (Björkman , 2018a).
Figure 2Illustration of the positioning of the transvaginal ultrasound-guided biopsy device. One hand is placed in the rectum (a) and the suspensory ligament of the ovary is palpated. After pulling on the ligament, the ovary is located and the proper ligament of the ovary held between the index and middle fingers, with the ovary on the palm side of the hand. The ovary (b) is pulled along the uterine cervix (c) into the peritoneal part of the pelvic cavity towards the cranial part of the vagina (d). With the other hand, the probe (e) is inserted into the vagina adjacent to the caudal part of the uterine cervix until the ovary becomes visible on the ultrasound screen (Björkman ).
In vitro and in vivo-related embryo transfer (ET) technologies in sows.
| Procedure | Need for research and development | References | |
|---|---|---|---|
| I. | Selection of the indicated sows with superior fertility traits | Follicular fluid composition, seasonal infertility and follicle size effects on oocyte developmental competence and embryonic survival. |
|
| I. | Oocyte/ embryo retrieval from donor sows | Flushing equipment for sows, skill acquisition |
|
| Ovum pick-up (OPU) in donor sows | OPU device for sows, OPU technique optimization, skill acquisition on live animals |
| |
| II. | Gametes: |
|
|
| Oocytes/ embryos: | Cryopreservation/ vitrification of embryos/ oocytes |
| |
| III. | Recipient sow synchronization | Hormonal synchronization protocol |
|
| ET on recipient sows | ET into the cranial portion of the corpus uteri |
|
Descriptive result of individual herd data for a successful intermittent suckling program. Data presented in mean ± SD. Data adapted from Hasan et al., 2019.
| Herd number | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type of production | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Traditional | Traditional | Traditional | Traditional | Traditional | Intermittent suckling | |
| Gestation length, days | 115 | 115.6 | 116.2 ± 0.1 | 115 | 114.4 ± 0.1 | 115.2 ± 0.2 |
| Farrowing duration, min | 211.9 ± 10.7 | 200.6 ± 12.9 | 329.2 ± 24.2 | 261.7 ± 22.1 | 306.7 ± 27.4 | 287.8 ± 23.9 |
| Litter size | 16.1 ± 0.5 | 16.7 ± 0.6 | 14.6 ± 0.6 | 17.1 ± 0.6 | 16.5 ± 0.5 | 16.1 ± 0.5 |
| Live-born piglets | 15.3 ± 0.5 | 15.5 ± 0.5 | 13.1 ± 0.5 | 16.5 ± 0.6 | 14.9 ± 0.4 | 15.4 ± 0.5 |
| Stillborn piglets | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 2.7 ± 0.5 | 0.6 ± 0.2 |
| Birth interval, min | 14.4 ± 0.9 | 13.7 ± 0.8 | 26.4 ± 2.7 | 16.6 ± 1.8 | 18.6 ± 1.2 | - |
| Birth time, min | 112.1 ± 3.1 | 100.3 ± 2.9 | 180.8 ± 7.9 | 142.2 ± 6.7 | 147.5 ± 4.1 | - |
| Litter characteristics | ||||||
| Piglet BWB (live born), g | 1445.7 ± 14.1 | 1275.0 ± 12.4 | 1413.6 ± 14.5 | 1220.48 ± 16.5 | 1279.2 ± 10.4 | 1446.1 ± 21.7 |
| Piglet weight (weaning: ear tagged), g | 6918.8 ± 105.8 | 6757.4 ± 106.3 | 7718.4 ± 161.2 | 5392.0 ± 149.2 | 7939.5 ± 55.28 | 6061.0 ± 135.5 |
| ADG* (ear tagged), g | 257.8 ± 4.3 | 246.1 ± 4.6 | 212.9 ± 5.0 | 224.0 ± 7.5 | 228.2 ± 1.7 | 246.3 ± 7.1 |
| Piglet age (weaning) days | 21.0 ± 0.03 | 21.6 ± 0.02 | 29.6 ± 0.09 | 18.1 ± 0.09 | 28.9 ± 0.03 | 19.4 ± 0.2 |
| CY**, g | 4658.5 ± 221.5 | 4009.4 ± 145.9 | 4132.2 ± 223.1 | 4336. 1 ± 268.4 | 4710.6 ± 129.4 | 3846.5 ± 367.3 |
| CI***, g | 332.0 ± 6.6 | 274. 3 ± 5.8 | 343.5 ± 7.2 | 270.9 ± 8.1 | 331.1 ± 4.5 | 262.5 ± 10.0 |
ADG* average daily gain, CY** colostrum yield, CI*** colostrum intake.