| Literature DB >> 32435149 |
Andrew Waleluma Darcy1, Seiji Kanda1, Tenneth Dalipanda2, Cynthia Joshua2, Takaki Shimono1, Pheophet Lamaningao1, Nobuyuki Mishima1, Toshimasa Nishiyama1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Solomon Islands, a country made up of tropical islands, has suffered cyclic dengue fever (DF) outbreaks in the past three decades. An outbreak of dengue-like illness (DLI) that occurred in April 2016 prompted this study, which aimed to determine the population's immunity status and identify the arboviruses circulating in the country.Entities:
Keywords: Arbovirus; Dengue fever; Immunity; Molecular; Seroprevalence
Year: 2020 PMID: 32435149 PMCID: PMC7225641 DOI: 10.1186/s41182-020-00217-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trop Med Health ISSN: 1348-8945
Fig. 1Map of Solomon Islands. A partial map of Solomon Islands, showing Honiara and Gizo, where the study was performed is shown
The primers used in the qPCR screening of the arbo-viruses
| Forward primers | Reverse primers | |
|---|---|---|
| DENV1 | ATA CCY CCA ACA GCA GGA ATT | AGC ATR AGG AGC ATG GTC AC |
| DENV2 | TGG ACC GAC AAA GAC AGA TTC TT | CGY CCY TGC AGC ATT CCA A |
| DENV3 | AAG ACG GGA AACCG TCT ATC AA | TTG AGA ATC TCT TCG CCA ACT G |
| DENV4 | CCA TCC CAC CRA CAG CAG G | CAA GAT GTT CAG CAT GCG GC |
| ZIKAV | AAG TTT GCA TGC TCC AAG AAA AT | CAG CAT TAT CCGGTA CTC CAG AT |
| CHIKV | CAA GAA AAT AAC ATC ACT GTA ACT | TCC AGG CTG AAG ACA TTG |
Fig. 2The number of cases detected in Honiara during the sentinel clinic surveillance from 2013 to 2016
The results of the household study in April 2016 showing the various arbovirus prevalence and characterization of the dengue infection in our study population
| Variable | N | Positive (prevalence %) | 95% CI (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dengue | 188 | 158 (83.4) | (77.7–88.3) | |
| Zika | 172 | 13 (7.6) | (4.1–11.6) | |
| Chikungunya | 122 | 1 (0.9) | (0.0–8.6) | |
| Gizo | 110 | 88 (80.0) | (71.3–87.0) | 0.14 |
| Honiara | 78 | 69 (88.4) | (79.2–94.6) | |
| Male | 83 | 64 (77.1) | (66.6–85.6) | 0.04 |
| Female | 105 | 93 (88.6) | (80.9–88.6) | |
| 1–5 | 26 | 16 (61.5) | (40.6–79.8) | 0.00 |
| 6–10 | 24 | 18 (75) | (53.3–90.2) | 0.02 |
| 11–15 | 33 | 26 (78) | (61.1–91.2) | 0.04 |
| 16–20 | 20 | 19 (95) | (75.1–99.8) | 0.90 |
| Private sector | 77 | 66 (85.7) | (75.9–92.0) | |
| Government | 68 | 52 (76.5) | (64.6–85.9) | 0.61 |
| Self employed | 23 | 21 (91.3) | (72.0–98.9) | 0.16 |
| Others | 16 | 14 (87.5) | (61.5–98.5) | 0.49 |
| Was ill | 98 | 82 (83.7) | (74.8–90.3) | 0.60 |
| Had fever | 69 | 54 (78.3) | (66.7–87.3) | 0.07 |
| Had malaria | 56 | 48 (85.7) | (73.8–93.6) | 0.36 |
| Had dengue fever | 15 | 13 (86.7) | (59.5–98.3) | 0.64 |
| Age group 1–20 | 103 | 0.17 | (0.135–0.231) | 0.00 |
Fig. 3The prevalence of the DENV in different age groups in the household survey
Dengue RDT sensitivity and specificity on 109 clinical samples
| Dengue assay | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RDT NS1 | 49/82 (60%) | 22/26 (84%) | 49/53 (92%) | 22/55 (40%) |
| RDT IgM or NS1 | 54/82 (66%) | 18/26 (69%) | 54/62 (87%) | 18/46 (39%) |
| RDT IgG | 26/82 (46%) | 13/26 (50%) | 26/39 (67%) | 13/69 (19%) |
Fig. 4The evolutionary history of the DENV according to an analysis of DENV-3 envelope gene (1479-bp) sequences performed using the maximum likelihood method. The numbers for each node indicate bootstrap values (≥ 70%)
Fig. 5The evolutionary history of the DENV according to an analysis of DENV-2 envelope gene (1485-bp) sequences performed using the maximum likelihood method. The numbers for each node indicate bootstrap values (≥ 70%)