Literature DB >> 32433993

A Reaching Performance Scale for 2 Wolf Motor Function Test Items.

Clarisa Martinez1, Helen Bacon2, Veronica Rowe3, David Russak4, Erin Fitzgerald2, Michelle Woodbury5, Steven L Wolf6, Carolee Winstein2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To adapt the Reaching Performance Scale for Stroke (RPSS) for the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) "Lift Can" (Can) and "Hand to Box" (Box) items.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of video-recorded WMFT assessment performed by 3 raters on 2 occasions.
SETTING: Not applicable. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (N=29) with mild to moderate upper extremity impairment less than 3 months after stroke.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Inter- and intra-rater agreement, concurrent validity of WMFT-RPSS.
RESULTS: Mean ± SD inter-rater Gwet's agreement coefficient (AC2) was 0.61±0.05 for Can WMFT-RPSS and 0.56 (0.03) for Box. Mean ± SD intra-rater AC2 for Can was 0.63±0.05 and 0.70±0.04 for Box. WMFT-RPSS Can and Box scores correlated with log mean WMFT time (C, -0.73; B, -0.48), Functional Ability Scale (C, 0.87; B, 0.62), Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Motor Score (C, 0.69; B, 0.51), and item movement rate (C, 0.74; B, 0.71) (P<.05 for all). Mean ± SD WMFT-RPSS score across the 29 participants was 12.7±3.5 for Can (max score, 19) and 11.4±3.0 for Box (max score, 16).
CONCLUSIONS: WMFT-RPSS demonstrated moderate intra-rater and weak-to-moderate inter-rater agreement for individuals with mild-moderate impairment. For construct validity, Can and Box WMFT-RPSS were significantly correlated with 4 standardized measures. Average WMFT-RPSS scores revealed that some participants may have relied on compensatory movements to complete the task, a revelation not discernable from movement rate alone. The WMFT-RPSS is potentially useful as a valid and reliable tool to examine longitudinal changes in movement quality after stroke.
Copyright © 2020 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Psychomotor performance; Rehabilitation; Stroke; Upper extremity

Year:  2020        PMID: 32433993      PMCID: PMC7669605          DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  11 in total

1.  The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke.

Authors:  D M Morris; G Uswatte; J E Crago; E W Cook; E Taub
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance.

Authors:  A R Fugl-Meyer; L Jääskö; I Leyman; S Olsson; S Steglind
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1975

Review 3.  Upper Limb Coordination in Individuals With Stroke: Poorly Defined and Poorly Quantified.

Authors:  Yosuke Tomita; Marcos R M Rodrigues; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2017-11-12       Impact factor: 3.919

4.  Effect of a Task-Oriented Rehabilitation Program on Upper Extremity Recovery Following Motor Stroke: The ICARE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Carolee J Winstein; Steven L Wolf; Alexander W Dromerick; Christianne J Lane; Monica A Nelsen; Rebecca Lewthwaite; Steven Yong Cen; Stanley P Azen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Interrater reliability of the Wolf Motor Function Test-Functional Ability Scale: why it matters.

Authors:  Susan V Duff; Jiaxiu He; Monica A Nelsen; Christianne J Lane; Veronica T Rowe; Steve L Wolf; Alexander W Dromerick; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.919

6.  Development and validation of a scale for rating motor compensations used for reaching in patients with hemiparesis: the reaching performance scale.

Authors:  Mindy F Levin; Johanne Desrosiers; Danielle Beauchemin; Nathalie Bergeron; Annie Rochette
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2004-01

Review 7.  Do Activity Level Outcome Measures Commonly Used in Neurological Practice Assess Upper-Limb Movement Quality?

Authors:  Marika Demers; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  Wolf Motor Function Test for characterizing moderate to severe hemiparesis in stroke patients.

Authors:  Timea M Hodics; Kyle Nakatsuka; Bhim Upreti; Arun Alex; Patricia S Smith; John C Pezzullo
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Interdisciplinary Comprehensive Arm Rehabilitation Evaluation (ICARE): a randomized controlled trial protocol.

Authors:  Carolee J Winstein; Steven L Wolf; Alexander W Dromerick; Christianne J Lane; Monica A Nelsen; Rebecca Lewthwaite; Sarah Blanton; Charro Scott; Aimee Reiss; Steven Yong Cen; Rahsaan Holley; Stanley P Azen
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 2.474

10.  Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic.

Authors:  Mary L McHugh
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.313

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.