Inigo Auzmendi1, Jim S Hanan1. 1. Centre for Horticultural Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Many experimental studies assume that some topological units are autonomous with regard to carbon because it is convenient. Some plant models simulate carbon allocation, employing complex approaches that require calibration and fitted parameters. For whole-tree canopy simulations, simpler carbon allocation models can provide useful insights. METHODS: We propose a new method for simulating carbon allocation in the whole tree canopy considering various scales of carbon autonomy, i.e. branchlets, branches, limbs, and no autonomy. This method was implemented in a functional-structural plant model of growth of individual organs for studying macadamia tree growth during one growing season. KEY RESULTS: This model allows the simulation of various scales of carbon autonomy in a simple tree canopy, showing organ within-tree variability according to the scale of autonomy. Using a real tree canopy, we observed differences in growth variability within the tree and in tree growth, with several scales of carbon autonomy. The simulations that assumed autonomy at branch scale, i.e. 2-year-old wood, showed the most realistic results. CONCLUSIONS: Simulations using this model were employed to investigate and explain aspects of differences in carbon autonomy between trees, organ growth variability, competition between shoot and fruit growth, and time of autonomy.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Many experimental studies assume that some topological units are autonomous with regard to carbon because it is convenient. Some plant models simulate carbon allocation, employing complex approaches that require calibration and fitted parameters. For whole-tree canopy simulations, simpler carbon allocation models can provide useful insights. METHODS: We propose a new method for simulating carbon allocation in the whole tree canopy considering various scales of carbon autonomy, i.e. branchlets, branches, limbs, and no autonomy. This method was implemented in a functional-structural plant model of growth of individual organs for studying macadamia tree growth during one growing season. KEY RESULTS: This model allows the simulation of various scales of carbon autonomy in a simple tree canopy, showing organ within-tree variability according to the scale of autonomy. Using a real tree canopy, we observed differences in growth variability within the tree and in tree growth, with several scales of carbon autonomy. The simulations that assumed autonomy at branch scale, i.e. 2-year-old wood, showed the most realistic results. CONCLUSIONS: Simulations using this model were employed to investigate and explain aspects of differences in carbon autonomy between trees, organ growth variability, competition between shoot and fruit growth, and time of autonomy.