Literature DB >> 3243305

An experimental study of the relationship between image quality and spatial resolution for the gamma camera.

P P Dendy1, R W Barber, C C Bayliss.   

Abstract

Many centres make regular measures of gamma camera performance as part of routine quality assurance programmes. Such measures may detect gradual deterioration in the camera but provide no basis on which to decide when corrective action should be taken. It is necessary to know when changes in camera performance are significant in terms of perceived image quality. In this work, one index of performance, the full width half maximum (FWHM) of the line spread function, was degraded in a controlled manner and the ability of observers to detect this change in the images produced was examined. Both simple and complex objects were investigated. A suitable decision criterion was suggested which indicated that changes of about 0.3 mm in the FWHM of the camera could be detected in the image. This figure was essentially independent of the complexity of the image, the initial FWHM of the camera and, above 300 k, the number of counts in the image. The way in which this type of experiment can help to establish a rational basis for gamma camera quality assurance programmes is discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3243305     DOI: 10.1007/bf00251779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0340-6997


  6 in total

1.  Relationship between objective and subjective assessment of gamma camera image sharpness.

Authors:  B Kasal; P F Sharp; P P Dendy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Scintillation camera nonuniformity: effects on cold lesion detectability.

Authors:  R J Van Tuinen; J B Kruger; G K Bahr; V J Sodd
Journal:  Int J Nucl Med Biol       Date:  1978

3.  Improved intrinsic resolution: does it make a difference? Concise communication.

Authors:  P B Hoffer; R Neumann; L Quartararo; R Lange; T Hernandez
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Practicality of NEMA performance specification measurements for user-based acceptance testing and routine quality assurance.

Authors:  U Raff; V M Spitzer; W R Hendee
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Relationship between objective and subjective assessment of image sharpness.

Authors:  H W Venema; N J Nagelkerke
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  The statistics of dose/cure relationships for irradiated tumours. Part I.

Authors:  E H Porter
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 3.039

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Analytical and experimental FWHM of a gamma camera: theoretical and practical issues.

Authors:  Diego Cecchin; Davide Poggiali; Lucia Riccardi; Paolo Turco; Franco Bui; Stefano De Marchi
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.984

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.