Literature DB >> 32432501

Bilateral and asymmetrical contributions of passive and active ankle plantar flexors stiffness to spasticity in humans with spinal cord injury.

Bing Chen1,2, Sina Sangari1,2, Jakob Lorentzen3, Jens B Nielsen3, Monica A Perez1,2.   

Abstract

Spasticity is one of the most common symptoms present in humans with spinal cord injury (SCI); however, its clinical assessment remains underdeveloped. The purpose of the study was to examine the contribution of passive muscle stiffness and active spinal reflex mechanisms to clinical outcomes of spasticity after SCI. It is important that passive and active contributions to increased muscle stiffness are distinguished to make appropriate decisions about antispastic treatments and to monitor its effectiveness. To address this question, we combined biomechanical and electrophysiological assessments of ankle plantarflexor muscles bilaterally in individuals with and without chronic SCI. Spasticity was assessed using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and a self-reported questionnaire. We performed slow and fast dorsiflexion stretches of the ankle joint to measure passive muscle stiffness and reflex-induced torque using a dynamometer and the soleus H reflex using electrical stimulation over the posterior tibial nerve. All SCI participants reported the presence of spasticity. While 96% of them reported higher spasticity on one side compared with the other, the MAS detected differences across sides in only 25% of the them. Passive muscle stiffness and the reflex-induced torque were larger in SCI compared with controls more on one side compared with the other. The soleus stretch reflex, but not the H reflex, was larger in SCI compared with controls and showed differences across sides, with a larger reflex in the side showing a higher reflex-induced torque. MAS scores were not correlated with biomechanical and electrophysiological outcomes. These findings provide evidence for bilateral and asymmetric contributions of passive and active ankle plantar flexors stiffness to spasticity in humans with chronic SCI and highlight a poor agreement between a self-reported questionnaire and the MAS for detecting asymmetries in spasticity across sides.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Spasticity affects a number of people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Using biomechanical, electrophysiological, and clinical assessments, we found that passive muscle properties and active spinal reflex mechanisms contribute bilaterally and asymmetrically to spasticity in ankle plantarflexor muscles in humans with chronic SCI. A self-reported questionnaire had poor agreement with the Modified Ashworth Scale in detecting asymmetries in spasticity. The nature of these changes might contribute to the poor sensitivity of clinical exams.

Entities:  

Keywords:  H reflex; Modified Ashworth Scale; biomechanical; muscle stiffness; stretch reflex; upper motor neuron

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32432501      PMCID: PMC7509290          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00044.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  65 in total

Review 1.  Spasticity-assessment: a review.

Authors:  F Biering-Sørensen; J B Nielsen; K Klinge
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Lower extremity manifestations of spasticity in chronic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  J W Little; P Micklesen; R Umlauf; C Britell
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 2.159

3.  Fibre type-specific increase in passive muscle tension in spinal cord-injured subjects with spasticity.

Authors:  M Charlotte Olsson; Martina Krüger; Lars-Henrik Meyer; Lena Ahnlund; Lennart Gransberg; Wolfgang A Linke; Lars Larsson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Isokinetic dynamometric technique for spasticity assessment.

Authors:  K K Firoozbakhsh; C F Kunkel; A M Scremin; M S Moneim
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.159

5.  Evaluation of reflex- and nonreflex-induced muscle resistance to stretch in adults with spinal cord injury using hand-held and isokinetic dynamometry.

Authors:  A Lamontagne; F Malouin; C L Richards; F Dumas
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1998-09

6.  Stop using the Ashworth Scale for the assessment of spasticity.

Authors:  J F M Fleuren; G E Voerman; C V Erren-Wolters; G J Snoek; J S Rietman; H J Hermens; A V Nene
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 7.  Muscle and bone plasticity after spinal cord injury: review of adaptations to disuse and to electrical muscle stimulation.

Authors:  Shauna Dudley-Javoroski; Richard K Shields
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008

8.  Glial reaction after pyramidotomy in mice and rats.

Authors:  S K Leong; E A Ling; D P Fan
Journal:  Neurodegeneration       Date:  1995-12

9.  Motoneuron Death after Human Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Robert M Grumbles; Christine K Thomas
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 10.  Recovery of neuronal and network excitability after spinal cord injury and implications for spasticity.

Authors:  Jessica M D'Amico; Elizabeth G Condliffe; Karen J B Martins; David J Bennett; Monica A Gorassini
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-12
View more
  3 in total

1.  Prevalence of spasticity in humans with spinal cord injury with different injury severity.

Authors:  Sina Sangari; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.974

2.  Distinct patterns of spasticity and corticospinal connectivity following complete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Sina Sangari; Steven Kirshblum; James D Guest; Martin Oudega; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 6.228

3.  Altered regulation of Ia afferent input during voluntary contraction in humans with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Bing Chen; Monica A Perez
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 8.713

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.