Literature DB >> 32432196

How restaurant and bar owners view clean indoor air legislation five years after implementation in North Carolina, 2015.

Ann H Staples1, Tara L Gallien2, Ryan Martin3, Joseph Lee3, Jennifer Cremeens-Matthews3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Smoke-free policies are effective in eliminating health hazards that can lead to chronic diseases and premature death. How hospitality businesses experience clean indoor air policies may provide leverage in States that have not adopted such policies. This study assessed whether North Carolina restaurants and bars receive complaints and/or experience benefits five years after implementation of the State's smoke-free law.
METHODS: A 2015 mail survey was used to assess problems, benefits, and voluntary policies (i.e., policies related to the use of electronic cigarettes indoors and outside smoke-free seating areas) among restaurant and bar owners/managers. The survey yielded 135 responses for a response rate of 20.3%.
RESULTS: The two most frequently selected benefits among respondents were customers breathing less tobacco smoke (65.2%) and fewer complaints about secondhand smoke (58.5%). The majority of restaurants (79.7%) and bars (71.4%) reported experiencing at least one benefit from the law. Restaurants were significantly more likely than bars to restrict the use of electronic cigarettes inside. No significant difference was found between restaurants and bars in smoke-free outdoor customer areas. Bars were more likely to report problems with the smoke-free law (e.g. lack of outdoor space for smoking, compliance issues).
CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals successes of North Carolina's smoke-free law. The majority of respondents reported experiencing at least one benefit of the law and some reported that they had implemented additional voluntary policies. Learning more about how hospitality businesses experience smoke-free laws can help other states and communities deal with similar policy changes in the future.
© 2017 Staples A.

Entities:  

Keywords:  secondhand smoke; smoke-free legislation; tobacco

Year:  2017        PMID: 32432196      PMCID: PMC7232802          DOI: 10.18332/tpc/75914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Prev Cessat        ISSN: 2459-3087


  13 in total

1.  Changes of attitudes and patronage behaviors in response to a smoke-free bar law.

Authors:  Hao Tang; David W Cowling; Jon C Lloyd; Todd Rogers; Kristi L Koumjian; Colleen M Stevens; Dileep G Bal
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Views about secondhand smoke and smoke-free policies among North Carolina restaurant owners before passage of a law to prohibit smoking.

Authors:  Laura A Linnan; Bryan J Weiner; J Michael Bowling; Erin M Bunger
Journal:  N C Med J       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

3.  Support for and reported compliance with smoke-free restaurants and bars by smokers in four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey.

Authors:  R Borland; H-H Yong; M Siahpush; A Hyland; S Campbell; G Hastings; K M Cummings; G T Fong
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Tobacco Product Use Among Adults - United States, 2013-2014.

Authors:  S Sean Hu; Linda Neff; Israel T Agaku; Shanna Cox; Hannah R Day; Enver Holder-Hayes; Brian A King
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 17.586

5.  Changes in smoking-related norms in bars resulting from California's Smoke-Free Workplace Act.

Authors:  Travis D Satterlund; Juliet P Lee; Roland S Moore
Journal:  J Drug Educ       Date:  2012

6.  State and Local Comprehensive Smoke-Free Laws for Worksites, Restaurants, and Bars - United States, 2015.

Authors:  Michael A Tynan; Carissa Baker Holmes; Gabbi Promoff; Cynthia Hallett; Maggie Hopkins; Bronson Frick
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 17.586

7.  Use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) impairs indoor air quality and increases FeNO levels of e-cigarette consumers.

Authors:  Wolfgang Schober; Katalin Szendrei; Wolfgang Matzen; Helga Osiander-Fuchs; Dieter Heitmann; Thomas Schettgen; Rudolf A Jörres; Hermann Fromme
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 5.840

Review 8.  Carbonyl compounds generated from electronic cigarettes.

Authors:  Kanae Bekki; Shigehisa Uchiyama; Kazushi Ohta; Yohei Inaba; Hideki Nakagome; Naoki Kunugita
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Stuck in Neutral: Stalled Progress in Statewide Comprehensive Smoke-Free Laws and Cigarette Excise Taxes, United States, 2000-2014.

Authors:  Carissa Baker Holmes; Brian A King; Stephen D Babb
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Metal and silicate particles including nanoparticles are present in electronic cigarette cartomizer fluid and aerosol.

Authors:  Monique Williams; Amanda Villarreal; Krassimir Bozhilov; Sabrina Lin; Prue Talbot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.