| Literature DB >> 32432149 |
Surabhi B Vora1,2, Alpana Waghmare1,3,2, Janet A Englund1,2, Pingping Qu2, Rebecca A Gardner1,2, Joshua A Hill3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Infectious complications of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell immunotherapy in children and young adults have not been well described.Entities:
Keywords: ALL; CAR T-cell; immunotherapy; infection; pediatric
Year: 2020 PMID: 32432149 PMCID: PMC7221263 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa121
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis ISSN: 2328-8957 Impact factor: 3.835
Demographic, Laboratory, and Clinical Characteristics
| Baseline Characteristics | No. (% Unless Indicated), n = 83 Unless Specified |
|---|---|
| Median age (range), y | 12 (1–25) |
| Female sex | 33 (40) |
| Race | |
|
| 9 (11) |
|
| 48 (57) |
|
| 14 (17) |
|
| 2 (2) |
|
| 4 (5) |
|
| 6 (7) |
| Underlying disease | 81 (98) |
|
| 1(1) |
|
| 1 (1) |
|
| |
| Prior allogeneic HCT | 46 (55) |
| Disease status | |
|
| 8 (10) |
|
| |
|
| 29 (35) |
|
| 31 (38) |
|
| 10 (12) |
|
| 5 (6) |
| Hematologic parameters before lymphodepletion, No. (%), median (range) | |
|
| 15 (18), 826 (0–8476) |
|
| 28 (34), 1071 (0–11 284) |
|
| 13 (16), 617 (143–1480) |
| Pre-CAR T-cell infections (days –90 to –1), No. (%) | 45 (54) |
|
| 29 (35) |
|
| 15(18) |
|
| 20 (24) |
| Antimicrobial prophylaxis, No. (%) | |
|
| 83 (100) |
|
| 29 (35) |
|
| 42 (51) |
|
| 12 (14) |
|
| 21 (25) |
|
| 2 (2) |
| Cyclophosphamide/fludarabine lymphodepletiona | 54 (65) |
| Cyclophosphamide only (3 g/m2) | 23 (28) |
| Otherb | 6 (7) |
| Post-CAR T-cell infusion characteristics | |
| Hematologic parameters, No. (%), median (range) | |
|
| |
|
| 62 (76), 32 (0–3043) |
|
| 38 (48), 624 (0–6636) |
|
| 5 (13), 2061 (0–7730) |
|
| |
|
| 57 (70), 129 (0–1606) |
|
| 28 (36), 429 (0–3515) |
|
| 8 (20), 567 (0–4183) |
| IgG level < 400 mg/dL | |
|
| 11 (14), 584 (168–1210) |
|
| 16 (29), 455 (190–760) |
| Cytokine release syndrome, any | 74 (89) |
|
| 66 (79) |
|
| 8 (10) |
| Corticosteroids and/or tocilizumab | 43 (52) |
| ICU admission by day 28 | 48 (58) |
| Death by day 28 | 3 (4) |
|
| 0 |
| Death by day 90 | 6 (8) |
|
| 1 (1) |
Abbreviations: ALC, absolute lymphocyte count; ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; ANC, absolute neutrophil count; CAR, chimeric antigen receptor; HCT, hematopoietic cell transplant; IgG, immunoglobulin G; PJP, Pneumocystis jirovecii.
aFludarabine 30 mg/m2 × 4 days plus cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 × 2 days (days 1, 2).
bFludarabine only (2%), cyclophosphamide only (1.5 g/m2, 4%), or cyclophosphamide and etoposide (1%).
Figure 1.Cumulative incidence curves of time to first infections in the first 28 days after CAR T-cell therapy. A–D, Cumulative incidences among all patients (n = 83) of any (A), bacterial (B), viral (C), and fungal (D) infections within 28 days after CTI. Dotted lines represent 95% confidence intervals. Death and loss to follow-up were treated as competing risks. Abbreviations: CAR, chimeric antigen receptor; CRS, cytokine release syndrome.
Incidence and Severity of Infections After CAR-T-cell Infusion
| Infection Days 0–28 | Infection Days 29–90 | Severity | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type of Infection | Events | No. of Patients (%) | Events | No. of Patients (%) | Mild–Moderate | Severe | Life-Threatening/Fatal |
| Any infection | 37 | 33 (40) | 12 | 11 (17) | 21 | 22 | 6 |
| Bacterial infections | 20 | 15 (18) | 5 | 5 (6) | 3 | 16 | 6 |
|
| 16 | 11 (13) | 3 | 3 (5) | 0 | 13 | 6 |
|
| 4 | 4 (5) | 2 | 2 (2) | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| Viral infections | 16 | 16 (19) | 7 | 7 (11) | 19 | 4 | 0 |
|
| 14 | 14 (17) | 7 | 7(11) | 18 | 3 | 0 |
|
| 2 | 2 (2) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Fungal infectionsd | 1 | 1 (1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
aSix gram-negative infections: Escherichia coli (3), Klebsiella oxytoca (1), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (1), Enterobacter cloacae (1). Thirteen gram-positive infections: Enterococcus faecalis (5), Streptococcus viridans (2), coagulase-negative staphylococci (3), Gordonia species (1), Microbacterium species (1), Clostridium tertium (1).
bSkin and soft tissue infection (3), pneumonia (1), central line site infection (1), proctitis (1).
cRhinovirus/enterovirus (10), parainfluenza (5), respiratory syncticial virus (3), influenza A (1), human metapneumovirus (1), coronavirus (1).
d Cunninghamella pulmonary infection.
Figure 2.Infection density before and after CAR T-cell therapy. Infection density was calculated as the total number of infection events per patient-days-at-risk multiplied by 100. Only data obtained during person-days-at risk contributed to these estimates. Infection densities are shown for any infection and by pathogen category for the time periods 90 days before CTI and 0–28 and 29–90 days after CTI. Abbreviations: CAR, chimeric antigen receptor; CRS, cytokine release syndrome.
Figure 3.Infection events in the first 28 days after CAR T-cell therapy stratified by CRS and the presence of neutropenia. A, Proportion of patients with infection by grade: 0 (no CRS): 30% (95% CI, 7%–65%); 1: 46% (95% CI, 28%–66%); 2: 32% (95% CI, 18%–50%); ≥3: 62% (95% CI, 24%–91%). Of note, the infection episode may have occurred before, during, or after CRS during this time period. B, The number of patients with each infection type stratified by the presence or absence of neutropenia (ANC < 500 cells/µL) at the time of infection. Abbreviations: CAR, chimeric antigen receptor; CI, confidence interval; CRS, cytokine release syndrome.
Pre-CAR T-cell Infusion Factors and Association With Infection Density Within 28 Days of Infusion
| Pre-CAR T Variables | Univariate Ratio of Infection Densities (95% CI) |
| Adjusted Ratio of Infection Densities (95% CI)a |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.99 (0.96–1.03) | .66 | ||
| Sex (male) | 0.93 (0.57–1.54) | .78 | ||
| Prior HCT | 1.69 (1.01–2.92) | .05 | 1.54 (0.92–2.69) | .11 |
| Pre-CAR T infections (day –90 to day 0) | 0.83 (0.51–1.37) | .46 | ||
| Relapsed (vs refractory) ALL | 1.6 (0.66–5.28) | .36 | ||
| Cyclophosphamide/fludarabine (vs other lymphodepletion) | 0.5 (0.30–0.82) | .01 | 0.46 (0.27–0.77) | <.01 |
| Prelymphodepletion parameters | ||||
| IgG < 400 mg/dL | 1.44 (0.77–2.53) | .23 | 1.69 (0.88–3.06) | .09 |
| ALC < 300 cells/mm3 | 1.05 (0.53–1.90) | .88 | ||
| ANC < 500 cells/mm3 | 1.13 (0.68–1.87) | .62 | ||
| CAR T dose (≥5 × 106 cells/kg vs other) | 1.02 (0.49–1.92) | .95 |
Abbreviations: ALC, absolute lymphocyte count; ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; ANC, absolute neutrophil count; CAR, chimeric antigen receptor; HCT, hematopoietic cell transplant; IgG, immunoglobulin G.
aMultivariate analysis includes variables with P < .25 in univariate analysis.
Risk Factors for Time to First Infection Within 28 Days of CAR-T-cell Infusion
| Univariate Hazard Ratio (95% CI) |
| Multivariate Hazard Ratio (95% CI)b |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-CTI variablesa | ||||
| Prior HCT | 2.23 (1.06–4.70) | .04 | 2.15 (0.98–4.73) | .05 |
| Lymphodepletion with cyclophosphamide plus fludarabine | 0.57 (0.28–1.02) | .05 | 0.45 (0.21–0.96) | .04 |
| Post-CTI variables | ||||
| CRS grade | ||||
| 1–2 (n = 66) | 0.57 (0.22–1.51) | .26 | 0.44 (0.16–1.23) | .11 |
| 3–5 (n = 8) | 2.47 (0.74–8.32) | .14 | 1.81 (0.53–6.15) | .34 |
| Tocilizumab use | 1.15 (0.48–2.77) | .75 | ||
| Steroid use | 0.55 (0.16–1.87) | .34 | ||
| ANC < 500 cells/μLc | 1.14 (0.49–2.65) | .75 | ||
| ALC < 300 cells/μLc | 0.92 (0.37–2.26) | .85 | ||
| IgG < 400 mg/dL | 1.99 (0.99–4.42) | .09 | 2.41 (1.02–5.69) | .04 |
Abbreviations: ALC, absolute lymphocyte count; ANC, absolute neutrophil count; CAR, chimeric antigen receptor; CRS, cytokine release syndrome; CTI, CAR-T-cell infusion; HCT, hematopoietic cell transplant; IgG, immunoglobulin G.
aAll pre-CTI variables included in the Poisson model (Table 3) were included in this analysis, except for pre-CTI IgG, which showed significant collinearity with post-CTI IgG. Only variables meeting the P value criterion for inclusion in the multivariate model (see below) are shown.
bMultivariate model includes variables with P < .25 in the univariate model only.
cANC and ALC data from the day of infection event were utilized when available; otherwise the most recent value was utilized. For each event, each value was considered as a dichotomous variable.