Literature DB >> 32431840

Urinary glucose and ketone bodies as indicators of acute caffeine poisoning.

Seiji Morita1, Tomoatsu Tsuji1, Mari Amino1, Naoya Miura1, Takeshi Saito1, Yoshihide Nakagawa1.   

Abstract

AIM: In various countries, many fatal health problems have been reported due to high intake of caffeine-rich energy drinks, tablets, and powders. In patients with acute caffeine poisoning, determination of blood caffeine concentration is an important yet difficult task. We aimed to assess whether the presence of glucose and ketone bodies in urine reflected the blood caffeine concentration in patients with acute caffeine poisoning.
METHODS: From April 2010 to March 2018, 25 patients with an overdose of only caffeine-rich tablets were admitted to our hospital. Their clinical features were investigated. In addition, we investigated whether the glucose and ketone bodies in the urine reflected blood caffeine concentration in 23 patients who underwent the urine qualitative test at admission.
RESULTS: The majority of the patients were young healthy women, whose average caffeine ingestion was 15.6 ± 8.1 g. Initial urine examinations showed glucose in 60% (14/23) of patients and ketone bodies in 57% (13/23) of patients. Ketone bodies or glucose were found in 78% (18/23) of the patients. The correlation between blood caffeine concentration and urinary glucose was R = 0.625, blood caffeine concentration and ketone bodies was R = 0.596, and blood caffeine and both was R = 0.76.
CONCLUSION: Urine qualitative test is effective for differential diagnosis and severity assessment of acute caffeine poisoning in patients.
© 2020 The Authors. Acute Medicine & Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Association for Acute Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute caffeine poisoning; blood caffeine concentration; caffeine; overdose; urine qualitative test

Year:  2020        PMID: 32431840      PMCID: PMC7231564          DOI: 10.1002/ams2.498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acute Med Surg        ISSN: 2052-8817


Introduction

AFFEINE, A NATURALLY derived compound found in coffee beans, tea leaves, and cacao beans, is classified as a relatively safe compound.1 Recently, many caffeine‐rich energy drinks and over‐the‐counter supplements have been sold as appetite suppressants, revitalizers, and high‐performance supplements.2, 3 However, many fatal health problems have been reported due to the combined use of alcohol and energy drinks, and their overdose.3, 4, 5 Several case reports and forensic reports on acute caffeine poisoning have already been published.6, 7, 8, 9, 10 In patients with acute caffeine poisoning, blood caffeine concentration plays a major role in treatment strategy, which is difficult to measure in real time. In 2014, we reported the correlation between blood lactate concentration and blood caffeine concentration in acute caffeine poisoning.11 This study aimed to assess whether the urine qualitative test (urinary glucose and ketone bodies) is simpler and more effective than the measurement of blood lactate concentration in reflecting blood caffeine concentration in patients with acute caffeine poisoning.

Methods

From April 2010 to March 2018, 25 patients with acute caffeine poisoning due to only caffeine‐rich tablets were admitted to our Trauma and Emergency Center. Their clinical parameters were recorded for this study. Among them, the results of 23 patients who underwent a urine qualitative test using the urine dipstick during admission were assessed for the levels of glucose and ketone bodies in the urine to determine whether the levels reflected blood caffeine concentration. Glucose is easily filtered in the glomerulus but is not present in the urine because the filtered glucose is normally reabsorbed. Therefore, a negative value is normal and ranges from 1+ to 4+, depending on the glucose concentration. When the intermediate products of fatty acid metabolism exceed the ability of the body to metabolize these compounds, ketone bodies accumulate in the blood and urine. However, urinary ketone bodies do not react qualitatively. Therefore, a negative value is normal and ranges from 1+ to 3+, depending on the amount of ketone bodies in the urine. The correlation was analyzed by plotting blood caffeine concentration on the vertical axis; the urinary glucose (negative, 1+, 2+, 3+, and 4+), urinary ketone bodies (negative, 1+, 2+, and 3+), and sum of the two (negative, 1+, 2+, 3+, 4+, 5+, 6+, and 7+) on the horizontal axis. The urinalysis in this study used Uro‐PaperIII (Eiken Chemical Co., Tokyo, Japan). Statistical analysis software (IBM spss Statistics version 26) was used for data analysis (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

Results

Clinical parameters of the 25 patients are shown in Table 1. The average age was 25.7 ± 8.3 years, and the majority of patients were young healthy women with an average caffeine ingestion of 15.6 ± 8.1 g. Initial vital signs showed that consciousness was either normal or mildly disturbed with tachycardia or tachypnea. No extreme hypotension or hypertension was observed. In the initial blood examination, the average blood caffeine concentration and average blood glucose level were 78.9 ± 54.6 μg/mL and 144.2 ± 27.8 mg/dL, respectively. In their initial urine examination, 60% (14/23) of patients had glucose and 57% (13/23) of patients had ketone bodies. Ketone bodies or glucose in the urine were found in 78% (18/23) of patients.
Table 1

Clinical features of 25 patients with acute caffeine poisoning

No.GenderAgeBMIEstimated intakeMedical historyGCSHRRRsBPBCCBGUrineSumOutcome
(years)Total (g)mg/kgPhysicalPsychiatric(b.p.m.)(/min)(mmHg)(μg/mL)(mg/dL)GlucoseKetone
1F1919.814311151083611242.8130101Survived
2M2418.810139151223212056.3134022Survived
3F4621.88127141351812252.7148213Survived
4M3918.91217115772012417.898000Survived
5F1621.012214+151002010620.7106000Survived
6F2328.4213501316424136205.1221325Survived
7F2428.422407151242610253.0119000Survived
8F3120.724414151223114262.9150112Survived
9F1723.612162151092210031.4135000Survived
10M3820.7244291314816106173.2168314Survived
11M2419.810132+151263311258.0119Survived
12F2029.98167141302813682.0142202Survived
13M4419.212203151122012842.0136011Survived
14F2818.79164151181913256.0140011Survived
15F2116.521339141102212277.0144101Survived
16F2327.719365151022610845.0182213Survived
17F2825.522407+15144299865.0140112Survived
18M1818.722282151222013240.0108101Survived
19M2124.137.560159824130105.9162404Survived
20F1918.71016915981811881.9178336Survived
21F2818.67.2103+1512423100125.5156022Survived
22F2222.34.896+1310418128108.3138112Survived
23M3027.115221+1418020120173.2140Survived
24F2320.46.3126+151102610811.1124000Survived
25F1628.428.4394147618130185.8188336Survived

BCC, blood caffeine concentration; BG, blood glucose; BMI, body mass index; F, female; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; HR, heart rate; M, male; RR, respiratory rate; sBP, systolic blood pressure.

Clinical features of 25 patients with acute caffeine poisoning BCC, blood caffeine concentration; BG, blood glucose; BMI, body mass index; F, female; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; HR, heart rate; M, male; RR, respiratory rate; sBP, systolic blood pressure. The correlation coefficients between blood caffeine concentration and glucose in the urine was 0.625 (Fig. 1A), between blood caffeine concentration and ketone bodies in the urine was 0.596 (Fig. 1B), and blood caffeine concentration and sum of the two in urine was 0.760, which were comparatively higher (Fig. 1C).
Fig. 1

Correlation graphs of (A) urinary glucose and blood caffeine concentration, (B) urinary ketone bodies and blood caffeine concentration, (C) both urinary glucose and ketone bodies and blood caffeine concentration in patients with acute caffeine poisoning patients.

Correlation graphs of (A) urinary glucose and blood caffeine concentration, (B) urinary ketone bodies and blood caffeine concentration, (C) both urinary glucose and ketone bodies and blood caffeine concentration in patients with acute caffeine poisoning patients.

Discussion

AFFEINE, A CENTRAL nervous system stimulant of the methylxanthine class, is the world’s most widely consumed psychoactive drug as it is unregulated.1, 2 In normal doses, there are three main mechanisms: (i) release of calcium from intracellular stores, (ii) inhibition of phosphodiesterase, (iii) antagonism of central and peripheral adenosine receptors. Because presynaptic adenosine receptors are blocked, the systemic release of catecholamines is increased.12, 13, 14 Due to this, caffeine awakens the central nervous system, reducing fatigue and sleepiness and improving reaction time, concentration, and motor control. In contrast, high doses of caffeine can lead to many fatal health problems, which have been reported in various countries.2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 15 Therefore, many organizations and countries are calling attention to the overconsumption of caffeine preparations.16, 17, 18 However, there are still many countries, including Japan, where they can be easily purchased over the counter. The symptoms of acute caffeine poisoning include electrolyte imbalance (hypokalemia and hyponatremia), lethal dysrhythmia, hypotension, convulsion, respiratory failure, lactic acidosis, and rhabdomyolysis.8, 19, 20, 21 The severity of acute caffeine poisoning depends on the blood caffeine concentration, which requires specialized techniques for its measurement. In Japan, Kamijo et al. undertook retrospective and multicenter studies on 101 patients who consumed high quantities of caffeinated supplements or energy drinks.21 However, only 17% (17/101) of patients had caffeine blood concentrations measured during admission, and whether it was measured in real time remained unclear. Therefore, a simple indicator of blood caffeine concentration is important. Schmidt and Karlson‐Stiber concluded that caffeine results in excessive sympathetic stimulation, which leads to lactic acidosis15 (Fig. 2). This served as a basis for our study in 2014, in which we reported the correlation between blood lactate levels and blood caffeine concentrations in patients with acute caffeine poisoning.14 We later realized that the mechanisms of production of urinary glucose and ketone bodies were similar to those of lactic acidosis and concluded that a urine qualitative test was a much simpler alternative. Although lactate is a highly correlated factor of caffeine blood concentration, it is dependent on many factors including convulsions and shock. Therefore, using both as indicators is effective in many situations.
Fig. 2

Mechanisms of production of urinary glucose and ketone bodies in acute caffeine poisoning. TCA, tricarboxylic acid.

Mechanisms of production of urinary glucose and ketone bodies in acute caffeine poisoning. TCA, tricarboxylic acid. The mechanisms of production of urinary glucose and ketone bodies are shown in Figure 2. In acute caffeine poisoning, excessive beta‐1 adrenergic receptor stimulation promotes lipolysis, producing increased levels of fatty acids and glycerol. These fatty acids are converted to acetyl‐CoA by beta‐oxidation, which is used in the tricarboxylic acid cycle. Any unused acetyl‐CoA is converted into ketone bodies, which enters the blood stream and consequently urine. In another pathway, excessive stimulation of beta‐2 adrenergic receptor promotes glycolysis and raises blood glucose levels, some of which enters the urine. Some glucose is converted to pyruvate. However, pyruvate dehydrogenase is inhibited to prevent pyruvate conversion to acetyl‐CoA, and hence, gluconeogenesis occurs from glycerol. These mechanisms result in hyperglycemia, resulting in the appearance of urinary glucose. In our patients, the average blood glucose level was high (144.2 mg/dL) and urinary ketone bodies or glucose was found in 78% (18/23) of them. The balance between glucose and ketone bodies in urine is unclear, but the sum of both correlated with blood caffeine concentration.

Limitation

In this study, patients with diabetes or other illnesses were not included and hence, it might not be effective in such cases.

Conclusion

Based on our findings, the urine qualitative test is a very simple and effective method that can be carried out at the clinic to assess the initial severity of acute caffeine poisoning in patients.

Disclosure

Approval of the research protocol: This study was conducted with the approval of the institutional ethics committee of the hospital (18R‐112). Informed consent: None. Registry and the registration no. of the study/trial: N/A. Animal studies: N/A. Conflict of interest: None.
  17 in total

1.  Fatal caffeine overdose and other risks from dietary supplements.

Authors:  E Randy Eichner
Journal:  Curr Sports Med Rep       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.733

2.  Energy drinks and caffeine-related adverse effects.

Authors:  Kent A Sepkowitz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  A case of suicide by ingestion of caffeine.

Authors:  Alessandro Bonsignore; Sara Sblano; Fulvia Pozzi; Francesco Ventura; Alessandro Dell'Erba; Cristian Palmiere
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 2.007

4.  Association of coffee intake with total and cause-specific mortality in a Japanese population: the Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study.

Authors:  Eiko Saito; Manami Inoue; Norie Sawada; Taichi Shimazu; Taiki Yamaji; Motoki Iwasaki; Shizuka Sasazuki; Mitsuhiko Noda; Hiroyasu Iso; Shoichiro Tsugane
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  A case of fatal caffeine poisoning.

Authors:  T Rudolph; K Knudsen
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 2.105

Review 6.  Caffeine as a psychomotor stimulant: mechanism of action.

Authors:  G Fisone; A Borgkvist; A Usiello
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  [Severe Caffeine Intentional Intoxication and Delayed Elimination: a Case Report].

Authors:  Mélody Barreau; Bérengère Lambert; Julien Tobarias; Dominique Lambert; Julien Dupouey; Olivier Blin; Romain Guilhaumou
Journal:  Therapie       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 2.070

8.  Overnight caffeine abstinence and negative reinforcement of preference for caffeine-containing drinks.

Authors:  P J Rogers; N J Richardson; N A Elliman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Energy drinks mixed with alcohol: misconceptions, myths, and facts.

Authors:  Joris C Verster; Christoph Aufricht; Chris Alford
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2012-03-02

10.  A Retrospective Study on the Epidemiological and Clinical Features of Emergency Patients with Large or Massive Consumption of Caffeinated Supplements or Energy Drinks in Japan.

Authors:  Yoshito Kamijo; Michiko Takai; Yuji Fujita; Kiyotaka Usui
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 1.271

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.