| Literature DB >> 32431677 |
Abstract
The family Cryomorphaceae for many years has been a poorly defined taxonomic group within the order Flavobacteriales, phylum Bacteroidetes. Members of the Cryomorphaceae, apparently consisting of multiple-family level clades, have been mostly but not exclusively detected in saline ecosystems. The problems with the taxonomy of this group have stemmed from inadequate resolution of taxonomic groups using 16S rRNA gene sequences, sparse numbers of cultivated taxa, and limited phenotypic distinctiveness. The Genome Tiaxonomc Database (GTDB), which is based on normalized taxonomic ranks includes Cryomorphaceae as containing the genera Owenweeksia and Schleiferia. This is at odds with the official taxonomy that places these genera in the family Schleiferiaceae. The other Cryomorphaceae affiliated species have even more uncertain taxonomic positions including Cryomorpha ignava. To clarify the taxonomy of Cryomorphaceae, genomes were generated for all type strains of the family Cryomorphaceae lacking such data. The GTDB-toolkit (GTDB-tk) was used to place taxa in the GTDB, which revealed novelty at the family level for some of these type strains. 16S rRNA gene sequences and concatenated protein sequences were used to further evaluate the taxonomy of the order Flavobacteriales. From the data, the GTDB enabled successful clarification of the taxonomy of the family Cryomorphaceae. A number of placeholder families were given Latinized names. It is proposed that the family Cryomorphaceae is emended to include only the species Cryomorpha ignava. The family Schleiferiaceae is emended to account for the expansion of its membership. Luteibaculum oceani represents a new family designated Luteibaculaceae fam. nov. Vicingus serpentipes is the representative of Vicingaceae fam. nov. while Salibacter halophilus represents Salibacteraceae fam. nov.Entities:
Keywords: Genome Taxonomy Database; bacteroidetes; cryomorphaceae; flavobacteriales; genomics; taxonomy
Year: 2020 PMID: 32431677 PMCID: PMC7214798 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00795
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
GTDB-tk (KBase) analysis of taxa investigated in this study.
| PHOS-HE28 | 0.7701 | 120 (0) | Taxonomic novelty determined using RED | |
| Gem2.bin46 (soda lake metagenome) | PHOS-HE28 | 0.7763 | 116 (1) | Taxonomic novelty determined using RED; Rnc (TIGR02191), PheS (TIGR00468), PheT (TIGR00472) not detected; PurB (TIGR00928) multiple copies |
| PHOS-HE28 | 0.7657 | 119 (0) | Taxonomic novelty determined using RED; Rnc (TIGR02191) not detected | |
| koll-22 | 0.8647 | 120 (0) | Taxonomic novelty determined using RED | |
| 1G12 | 0.8414 | 120 (0) | Taxonomic novelty determined using RED | |
| 0.7744 | 120 (0) | Taxonomic classification fully defined by topology | ||
| 0.7737 | 120 (0) | Taxonomic classification fully defined by topology | ||
| 0.986 | 119 (0) | Taxonomic classification fully defined by topology; SecE (TIGR00964) not detected; ANI 80.7% with |
FIGURE 116S rRNA gene sequence based BioNJ tree focusing on sequences related to the family Cryomorphaceae and related taxa of the order Flavobacteriales, phylum Bacteroidetes. The tree is a consensus tree generated in IQ-Tree. Bootstrap values converted to a percentile scale are based on 1000 replicates determined using the ultrafast method of Hoang et al. (2018). Only bootstraps exceeding 50% are shown. Color strips indicate location of family-level lineages based on the GTDB framework. Family designations include the GTDB and the revised taxonomy determined in this study. Star symbols located on branches indicate validated described type strains relevant to this study. More detailed information on taxa compared is shown in Table 2 and Supplementary Table S1.
FIGURE 2GTDB Bac120 protein set based BioNJ tree focusing on sequences related to the family Cryomorphaceae and related taxa of the order Flavobacteriales, phylum Bacteroidetes. The tree is a consensus tree generated in IQ-Tree. Bootstrap values converted to a percentile scale are based on 200 replicates. Only bootstraps exceeding 50% are shown. Color strips indicate location of family-level lineages based on the GTDB framework. Family designations include the GTDB and the revised taxonomy determined in this study. Star symbols located on branches indicate validated described type strains relevant to this study. More detailed information on taxa compared is shown in Table 2 and Supplementary Table S1.
FIGURE 3Concatenated protein based BioNJ tree covering family Cryomorphaceae and related taxa of the order Flavobacteriales and including other taxa of the phylum Bacteroidetes. The protein set used is based 33 proteins covering 7530 amino acid positions designated the DnaA/RpsJ-RplQ/Eno set (see “Materials and Methods” for protein list). The tree is a consensus tree generated in IQ-Tree. Bootstrap values converted to a percentile scale are based on 200 replicates. Only bootstraps exceeding 50% are shown. Color strips indicate location of family-level lineages based on the GTDB framework. Family designations include the GTDB and the revised taxonomy determined in this study. Star symbols located on branches indicate validated described type strains relevant to this study. More detailed information on taxa compared is shown in Table 2 and Supplementary Table S1.
Genomic-level and habitat characteristics of family level lineages of order Flavobacteriales (based on data investigated in this study).
| 2 | 40.4–49.3 | 3.5–5.0 | Mildly saline marine and terrestrial ecosystems | |
| 1 | 39.9 | 2.9 | Coastal seawater | |
| 34 | 36.5–57.9 | >1.3–4.7 (1.8) | Seawater, marine algal cultures, riverine/lake/hot spring freshwater | |
| 12 | 36.0–49.1 | >2.2–5.4 (3.3) | Seawater, solar saltern, coral mucus, salt marsh/swamp water | |
| 17 | 31.0–42.8 | >1.8–5.0 (3.1) | Seawater, marine biofilm, riverine/lake/aquifer freshwater | |
| 40 | 31.4–49.5 | >1.1–5.1 (3.6) | Seawater, saline lakes, sea-ice, marine sediment, coral mucus, seaweed surface, riverine/lake/aquifer freshwater/sediment, wastewater/bioreactor samples, soil | |
| 5 | 20.9–37.0 | 0.2–1.3 (0.3) | Insect obligate endosymbionts | |
| 14 | 29.1–45.1 | 2.0–5.6 (3.0) | Insect, animal and human microbiomes | |
| 21 | 29.8–47.1 | 2.5–5.0 (3.8) | Marine ecosystems (seawater, sediment, fauna, flora), fish microbiomes, freshwater, soil, animal oral microbiome | |
| BACL11 | 17 | 28.2–38.5 | >1.0–3.0 (1.7) | Seawater |
| GCA-002722245 (NS8b) | 3 | 33.9–34.7 | >2.0–3.1 (3.0) | Seawater |
| GCA-002746335 | 1 | 41.6 | >4.2 | Seawater |
| J034 | 1 | 37.2 | ∼2.5 | Iron-rich hot spring (Japan) |
| NORP154 | 2 | 40.8–43.6 | >2.5–3.0 | Seawater |
| PHOS-HE28 | 4 | 59–65 | >3.2–4.5 | Wastewater, activated sludge |
| TMED113 | 7 | 28.0–31.2 | >0.9–1.5 (1.5) | Seawater |
| UA16 (NS10b) | 32 | 37.4–61.1 | >1.4–2.9 (2.3) | Seawater; lake water |
| UBA1820 | 2 | 47.9–56.6 | >1.8–2.0 | Avian and human gut microbiomes |
| UBA2798 | 1 | 41.8 | >3.8 | Activated sludge |
| UBA7430 | 2 | 26.9–38.8 | >1.7–1.8 | Seawater |
| UBA10066 (“Agg58” clade) | 15 | 29.5–41.0 | >0.9–2.8 (2.3) | Seawater |
| UBA10329 | 2 | 42.1–49.4 | >1.8–2.9 | Marine water and sediment |
| UJ101 | 1 | 30.7 | 3.1 | Marine fauna |