| Literature DB >> 32431545 |
Yue-Lin Zhang1,2, Tan-Yang Zhou1,2, Jing Ai3, Sheng-Qun Chen1,2, Feng Chen4, Chun-Hui Nie1,2, Xin-Hua Chen1,2, Guan-Hui Zhou1,2, Hong-Liang Wang1,2, Tong-Yin Zhu1,2, Bao-Quan Wang1,2, Zi-Niu Yu1,2, Li Jing1,2, Li-Ming Wu1,2, Shu-Sen Zheng1,2, Jun-Hui Sun1,2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Gene-targeting therapy provides a novel therapeutic approach for tumor treatment using genetically modified endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) as cellular carriers. This study applied EPCs armed with cytosine deaminase (CD) and endostatin (ES) fusion gene in liver cancer to explore its therapeutic effect.Entities:
Keywords: cytosine deaminase; endostatin; endothelial progenitor cell; gene-targeting therapy; hepatoma; transfection
Year: 2020 PMID: 32431545 PMCID: PMC7198450 DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S245998
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Manag Res ISSN: 1179-1322 Impact factor: 3.989
Figure 1mRNA levels of CD and ES genes. (A) CD gene. (B) ES gene. Blank: EPCs; NC: EPCs transfected with LV; Endostatin OE: EPCs transfected with LV-CD/ES (**P<0.01 vs NC).
Figure 2Western blot analysis of endostatin. Blank: EPCs; NC: EPCs transfected with LV; Endostatin OE: EPCs transfected with LV-CD/ES (**P<0.01 vs NC).
Figure 35-FU concentrations of supernatants. Blank: EPCs; NC: EPCs transfected with LV; Endostatin OE: EPCs transfected with LV-CD/ES (**P<0.01 vs NC).
Figure 4Cell proliferation among the three groups. Blank: EPCs; NC: EPCs transfected with LV; Endostatin OE: EPCs transfected with LV-CD/ES (**P<0.01 vs NC).
Figure 5Cell migration among the three groups (×200). Blank: EPCs; NC: EPCs transfected with LV; Endostatin OE: EPCs transfected with LV-CD/ES (**P<0.01 vs NC).
Figure 6Tumor volumes assessed by MRI after cell transplantation. (A) Control, (B) HepG2, (C) HepG2+EPC, (D) HepG2+CD/ES, (E) HepG2+CD/ES-EPC, and (F) statistical analysis of tumor volumes (**P<0.01 vs other groups).
Figure 7VEGF staining after cell transplantation. (A) Control, (B) HepG2, (C) HepG2+EPC, (D) HepG2+CD/ES, (E) HepG2+CD/ES-EPC, and (F) statistical analysis of VEGF-positive rate (**P<0.01 vs other treatment groups).
Figure 8CD31-positive staining after cell transplantation. (A) Control, (B) HepG2, (C) HepG2+EPC, (D) HepG2+CD/ES, (E) HepG2+CD/ES-EPC, and (F) statistical analysis of CD31-positive rate (**P<0.01 vs other treatment groups).
Figure 9Apoptosis of tumor cells after cell transplantation. (A) Control, (B) HepG2, (C) HepG2+EPC, (D) HepG2+CD/ES, (E) HepG2+CD/ES-EPC, and (F) statistical analysis of TUNEL-positive rate (**P<0.01 vs other groups).