| Literature DB >> 32431406 |
Abstract
In the September article "Should Parents of Neonates with Bleak Prognosis Be Encouraged to Opt for Another Child with Better Odds? On the Notion of Moral Replaceability," (Tännsjö 2018, S552-57), the author contrasts how three different moral philosophies can be applied to medical decision-making for periviable babies. Unfortunately, the sanctity of life doctrine is critically misrepresented. Unlike what is stated in the article, this doctrine is not a framework that unconditionally advises the resuscitation of all extremely premature babies at all costs under any circumstances. Instead, by considering the degree of usefulness and burdensomeness of medical treatments, the sanctity of life doctrine exercises a prudent stewardship over finite resources while simultaneously honoring the inherent dignity in every human being. © Catholic Medical Association 2019.Entities:
Keywords: Applied ethics; Difficult moral questions; Dignity of the human person; Ethics at the lower limit of neonatal viability; Life issues; Medical decision-making; Moral status; Neonatology; Ordinary and extraordinary means; Withdrawal/withholding of life-sustaining treatment
Year: 2019 PMID: 32431406 PMCID: PMC6699050 DOI: 10.1177/0024363919856819
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Linacre Q ISSN: 0024-3639