Literature DB >> 32431405

Dialogic Consensus as the Moral Philosophical Basis for Shared Decision-making.

Paul Walker1.   

Abstract

Shared decision-making is important and beneficial for patients. Practically, this requires that we explore the values of the patient and the clinician and then consider available treatment options. The aim is to maximize the good of the patient in the context of their illness. Hence, clinical consultations are situations in which we can, and should, draw upon moral philosophical precepts. One such precept, which can fortify the foundations of shared decision-making, is a process of inclusive, noncoercive, and reflective dialogue, which aims at reaching a consensual decision as to what is best for the patient in their situation. Summary: Shared decision making is important and helpful for patients. This is based upon having a conversation about values and what is important. We can base that conversation on principles of moral philosophy, via a process termed "dialogic consensus". © Catholic Medical Association 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dialogic consensus; Medical ethics; Moral philosophy; Shared decision-making

Year:  2019        PMID: 32431405      PMCID: PMC6699040          DOI: 10.1177/0024363919841775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Linacre Q        ISSN: 0024-3639


  3 in total

1.  Shared decision making: what do clinicians need to know and why should they bother?

Authors:  Tammy C Hoffmann; France Légaré; Magenta B Simmons; Kevin McNamara; Kirsten McCaffery; Lyndal J Trevena; Ben Hudson; Paul P Glasziou; Christopher B Del Mar
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 7.738

2.  Dialogic Consensus In Clinical Decision-Making.

Authors:  Paul Walker; Terry Lovat
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  Dialogic Consensus in Medicine-A Justification Claim.

Authors:  Paul Walker; Terence Lovat
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2019-01-14
  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Referral vs Transfer of Care: Ethical Options When Values Differ.

Authors:  Cynthia Jones-Nosacek
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2021-12-06

2.  Decision-making approaches in transgender healthcare: conceptual analysis and ethical implications.

Authors:  Karl Gerritse; Laura A Hartman; Marijke A Bremmer; Baudewijntje P C Kreukels; Bert C Molewijk
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2021-05-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.