Literature DB >> 32430948

Breast cancer surgery under the shadow of COVID-19: Quest for optimal axillary management after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.

Ilhan Tasdoven1, Guldeniz Karadeniz Cakmak1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; axillary staging; breast cancer; neo-adjuvant chemotherapy; sentinel lymph node biopsy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32430948      PMCID: PMC7276864          DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.269


× No keyword cloud information.
The disastrous COVID‐19 pandemic caused great challenges in regard to medical and surgical management worldwide. Surgeons are currently responsible to serve infected patients and to treat nondeferrable oncologic cases in an optimal way. In all circumstances, oncologic safety must be the priority. Particularly in patients converted to cN0 after neo‐adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an option; however, the evaluation of axilla is a challenge.

STUDY DESIGN

After COVID‐19 outbreak, lymphoscintigraphic evaluations were canceled and we initiated a modified algorithm of targeted axillary dissection (TAD; marking metastatic node with a clip before NAC and resecting node during SLNB) and SLNB via dual‐agent mapping of ICG (indocyanine green) and patent blue dye (PB) to spare cN0 patients from devastating consequences of ALND at our institution. Herein, our data about this hybrid technique without radiocolloid are presented. As primary outcome, rate of SLN identification, and as secondary outcome number, pathologic status and discordance between SLNS and clipped nodes were evaluated.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

After induction of anesthesia, periareolar injection of fluorescent ICG (2 mL‐2.5 mg/mL) (DID; Samsung) and PB was followed by massage. Once fluorescence visualized (SPY; Novadaq) in axilla, the precise spot was marked to design incision. With ICG detecting probe (Euoroprobe3), fluorescent avid nodes excised with attention to ligate each lymphatic. Specimen radiography was coupled with second‐look US in case of the absence of clip in imaging. Frozen section (FS) analysis of SLNs was standard surgical practice. Fluorescent and/or blue nodes were defined as “sentinel” irrelevant to clip presence.

RESULTS

The clinicopathologic characteristics of 12 cN0 patients are summarized in Table 1. SLN was identifiable with ICG + PB in 10/12 patients (83%). The median lymph node harvest was 4 nodes (range 0‐12). The clipped node was one of SLNs in 10 cases (83%). In two out of 12 cases, clipped nodes were found via second‐look US. The dual tracer mapping with TAD indicated ALND for four patients (33%) due to failure of dual‐agent mapping in two cases, positive SLNs in FS for one case, and in final pathology for another case. In ten cases, ≥3 SLNs were identified. There was pathologic concordance between clipped and SLNs in 9 out of 10 cases (90%). Dual mapping method identified totally 39 SLNs. Three SLNs were positive in FS and 6 out of 39 SLNs in final pathology. In regard to metastasis, 50% was only ICG, 33% was both ICG and PB, and 16% was only PB positive (Table 2). The overall FNR for dual‐agent mapping was 25% on FS, and sensitivity for nodal metastasis was 75% (Table 3).
Table 1

Clinicopathologic characteristics

Characteristics
Mean Age46 (range:30‐60)
Menopausal status
Premenopausal6
Postmenopausal6
Histology
Invasive ductal carcinoma8
Invasive lobular carcinoma3
Mucinous1
Breast Surgery
Breast‐conserving Surgery10
Mastectomy2
Axillary surgery
SLNB9
SLNB + ALND3
Pathologic T stage
pCR3
Non‐pCR9
Pathologic N stage
pCR8
Non‐pCR4
Lymphovascular Invasion
Positive4
Negative8
Subtype
HR‐positive5
HER2‐positive3
TNBC2
Ki 67 (%)
<20%3
>20%9
Grade
I3
II7
III2

Abbreviations: ALND, axillary lymph node dissection; ER, estrogen receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; N, nodal, pCR, pathologic complete response; PR, progesterone receptor; SLNB, sentinel lymph node biopsy; T, tumor.

Table 2

Number of SLNs identified via ICG, PB, and clip

SLNMetastaticNon‐metastaticN (%)
ICG + PB+2 (33%)8 (24%)10 (25%)
ICG + PB‐3 (50%)12 (36%)15 (38%)
ICG–PB+1 (16%)13 (39%)14 (35%)
ICG–PB–Clip+2 patients excluded (ALND)
Total SLN6 (100%)33 (100%)39 (%100)

Abbreviations: ALND, axillary lymph node dissection; ICG Indocyanine green; PB patent blue; SLN sentinel lymph node.

Table 3

SLN harvest to detect axillary metastasis on intraoperative pathology

Characteristic

ICG + PB

(n = 12)

SLN:<3 nodes

(n = 2)

SLN:≥3 nodes

(n = 10)

Clipped node alone

(n = 12)

Frozen Section Analysis
True positives3023
False positives0000
True negatives8088
False negatives1201
Sensitivity for nodal metastasis75%%10075%
False‐negative rate (%)25%%10025%

Abbreviations: ICG, Indocyanine green; PB patent blue; SLN sentinel lymph node.

Clinicopathologic characteristics Abbreviations: ALND, axillary lymph node dissection; ER, estrogen receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; N, nodal, pCR, pathologic complete response; PR, progesterone receptor; SLNB, sentinel lymph node biopsy; T, tumor. Number of SLNs identified via ICG, PB, and clip Abbreviations: ALND, axillary lymph node dissection; ICG Indocyanine green; PB patent blue; SLN sentinel lymph node. SLN harvest to detect axillary metastasis on intraoperative pathology ICG + PB (n = 12) SLN:<3 nodes (n = 2) SLN:≥3 nodes (n = 10) Clipped node alone (n = 12) ICG + PB + Clipped node (n = 12) Abbreviations: ICG, Indocyanine green; PB patent blue; SLN sentinel lymph node. Under the siege of COVID‐19, various resources had to be sacrificed to save lives. However, we have to serve our best to cancer patients. Fluorescent imaging is a competing technology challenging the standard procedure of SLNB with radioactivity in centers without accessibility to lymphoscintigraphy with the limited data in the setting of NAC. The most controversial issue in regard to SLNB after NAC is FNR. Prospective trials encouraged dual mapping, achieving at least 3 SLNs, incorporating immunohistochemistry and TAD to decrease FNR (<10%). , , , However, ALND is the only option when failed to identify clip intraoperatively. This issue could be addressed via intraoperative sonography which helped us to avoid ALND. Moreover, confirmation of metastasis in clipped node via FS generated ALND indication and spared us from secondary surgery. In addition, the recommended SLN harvest was achieved to optimize FNR which was 25% in FS, decreasing to null when combined with TAD in final pathology. ICG mapping determined metastasis in 83% of our cases. However, PB achieved this goal in 49%. The limitations of presented study with low sample size and no follow‐up require interpreting results with caution. Moreover, higher number of SLNs identified with ICG might have possible side effects including lymphedema. NAC has potential to deescalate axillary surgery in patients converted to cN0. Therefore, techniques designed to predict axillary status during COVID‐19 pandemic have great value. In this regard, clipping metastatic node, dual‐agent mapping, and intraoperative sonography are vital. Whether the replacement of radiocolloid with ICG in this setting will depend upon its validation via larger series, the demonstration of clinical advantages of presented hybrid technique, in terms of yielding adequate SLN harvest and acceptable FNR, is considerable. Shared decision‐making with patients is of paramount importance.
  5 in total

1.  Axillary Lymph Node Ultrasound Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Biopsy-Proven Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Results from the SN FNAC Study.

Authors:  Dominique Morency; Sinziana Dumitra; Elena Parvez; Karyne Martel; Mark Basik; André Robidoux; Brigitte Poirier; Claire M B Holloway; Louis Gaboury; Lucas Sideris; Sarkis Meterissian; Jean-François Boileau
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy in patients with breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SENTINA): a prospective, multicentre cohort study.

Authors:  Thorsten Kuehn; Ingo Bauerfeind; Tanja Fehm; Barbara Fleige; Maik Hausschild; Gisela Helms; Annette Lebeau; Cornelia Liedtke; Gunter von Minckwitz; Valentina Nekljudova; Sabine Schmatloch; Peter Schrenk; Annette Staebler; Michael Untch
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer: the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) clinical trial.

Authors:  Judy C Boughey; Vera J Suman; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Gretchen M Ahrendt; Lee G Wilke; Bret Taback; A Marilyn Leitch; Henry M Kuerer; Monet Bowling; Teresa S Flippo-Morton; David R Byrd; David W Ollila; Thomas B Julian; Sarah A McLaughlin; Linda McCall; W Fraser Symmans; Huong T Le-Petross; Bruce G Haffty; Thomas A Buchholz; Heidi Nelson; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Use of indocyanine green fluorescence compared to radioisotope for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Janindu Goonawardena; Charles Yong; Michael Law
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Improved Axillary Evaluation Following Neoadjuvant Therapy for Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer Using Selective Evaluation of Clipped Nodes: Implementation of Targeted Axillary Dissection.

Authors:  Abigail S Caudle; Wei T Yang; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Dalliah M Black; Michael Z Gilcrease; Isabelle Bedrosian; Brian P Hobbs; Sarah M DeSnyder; Rosa F Hwang; Beatriz E Adrada; Simona F Shaitelman; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Benjamin D Smith; Rosalind P Candelaria; Gildy V Babiera; Basak E Dogan; Lumarie Santiago; Kelly K Hunt; Henry M Kuerer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 44.544

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.