Patrizia Todisco1, Paolo Meneguzzo2,3, Alice Garolla1, Athos Antoniades4, Paris Vogazianos5, Federica Tozzi4. 1. Eating Disorders Unit, Casa di Cura "Villa Margherita", via Costacolonna 20, Arcugnano, VI, Italy. 2. Eating Disorders Unit, Casa di Cura "Villa Margherita", via Costacolonna 20, Arcugnano, VI, Italy. meneguzzo.p@gmail.com. 3. Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy. meneguzzo.p@gmail.com. 4. Research and Development, Stremble Ventures, Limassol, Cyprus. 5. Behavioral Sciences Department, European University Cyprus, Engomi, Cyprus.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to assess the differences between impulsive and non-impulsive patients in response to a multidisciplinary intensive inpatient treatment for eating disorders (EDs). METHODS: 320 patients with EDs were consecutively recruited in an eating disorders unit (EDU). They were assessed by clinical interviews and self-reported questionnaires. The treatment was characterized by a patient-centric approach and included both an intensive and comprehensive standardized multidisciplinary program based on cognitive-behavioral therapy and a flexible and personalized component according to the needs and the history of each patient. RESULTS: Impulsive ED patients showed greater improvement in specific psychopathological areas, in particular: interpersonal sensitivity of Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90) (p = 0.007); Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) Global Score (p = 0.009), EDE-Q eating concern (p < 0.001) and EDE-Q shape concern (p = 0.025). The two groups also showed a different pattern on the Body Uneasiness Test, with impulsive patients uniquely showing improvement on Global Severity Index (p = 0.006), body image concern (p = 0.008), compulsive self monitoring (p = 0.002), and weight phobia (p = 0.037). DISCUSSION: Results support the hypothesis that patients with impulsive behaviors might benefit from treatments characterized by a standardized cognitive behavioral therapy implemented by third-wave interventions according to each patient's clinical profile. Personalized treatment approaches could be an answer to the complexity of ED, addressing individual psychopathology. Further studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, cohort or case-control analytic studies.
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to assess the differences between impulsive and non-impulsive patients in response to a multidisciplinary intensive inpatient treatment for eating disorders (EDs). METHODS: 320 patients with EDs were consecutively recruited in an eating disorders unit (EDU). They were assessed by clinical interviews and self-reported questionnaires. The treatment was characterized by a patient-centric approach and included both an intensive and comprehensive standardized multidisciplinary program based on cognitive-behavioral therapy and a flexible and personalized component according to the needs and the history of each patient. RESULTS:Impulsive EDpatients showed greater improvement in specific psychopathological areas, in particular: interpersonal sensitivity of Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90) (p = 0.007); Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) Global Score (p = 0.009), EDE-Q eating concern (p < 0.001) and EDE-Q shape concern (p = 0.025). The two groups also showed a different pattern on the Body Uneasiness Test, with impulsive patients uniquely showing improvement on Global Severity Index (p = 0.006), body image concern (p = 0.008), compulsive self monitoring (p = 0.002), and weight phobia (p = 0.037). DISCUSSION: Results support the hypothesis that patients with impulsive behaviors might benefit from treatments characterized by a standardized cognitive behavioral therapy implemented by third-wave interventions according to each patient's clinical profile. Personalized treatment approaches could be an answer to the complexity of ED, addressing individual psychopathology. Further studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, cohort or case-control analytic studies.
Authors: Kelsie T Forbush; Kelsey E Hagan; Benjamin A Kite; Danielle A N Chapa; Brittany K Bohrer; Sara R Gould Journal: Compr Psychiatry Date: 2017-06-28 Impact factor: 3.735
Authors: David B Sarwer; Kelly C Allison; Thomas A Wadden; Rebecca Ashare; Jacqueline C Spitzer; Courtney McCuen-Wurst; Caitlin LaGrotte; Noel N Williams; Michael Edwards; Colleen Tewksbury; Jingwei Wu Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2019-02-23 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Stefano Valente; Giulia Di Girolamo; Martina Forlani; Anna Biondini; Paolo Scudellari; Diana De Ronchi; Anna Rita Atti Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: Kathryn E Smith; Ross D Crosby; Stephen A Wonderlich; Kelsie T Forbush; Tyler B Mason; Markus Moessner Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2018-02-16 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Paolo Meneguzzo; Chiara Cazzola; Roberta Castegnaro; Francesca Buscaglia; Enrica Bucci; Anna Pillan; Alice Garolla; Elisa Bonello; Patrizia Todisco Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2021-03-31
Authors: Paolo Meneguzzo; Patrizia Todisco; Enrico Collantoni; Valentina Meregalli; David Dal Brun; Elena Tenconi; Angela Favaro Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-12-15 Impact factor: 4.241