Acute myocardial infarction due to coronary stent thrombosis in a symptomatic COVID-19 patient.

Sirs:

A 65-year-old gentleman presented to our hospital with fever, dry cough and body aches and a presumed respiratory tract infection. His past medical history included coronary heart disease and myocardial infarction 4 years previously due to marginal branch occlusion. This initial lesion was treated by stenting of the marginal branch and LAD (2.5/16 mm and 3.0/22 mm drug eluting stents; Zotarolimus/ABT-578). Two years after the first stent implantation, neo-intimal proliferation required a second drug-eluting stent of the marginal branch stent (2.75/16 mm, Everolimus). The patient’s risk profile comprised type 2 diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension and hyperlipidaemia.

At admission, the initial vital parameters and laboratory results were: Temp. 39.0 °C, White Blood Cell count 3.91 × 1012 cells/l, Haemoglobin 12.8 g/dl, creatinine 1.44 mg/dl, eGFR 52.2 ml/m/1.73 m2, C-reactive protein 61.4 mg/dl, LDH 413 U/l, CK 130 U/l, procalcitonin (PCT) 0.08 ng/ml, oxygen saturation 92% at room air. These were consistent with acute respiratory tract infection. A routine ECG demonstrated sinus rhythm with normal heart rate, without bundle branch block or ST-alterations (Fig. 1a). Chest X-ray revealed diffuse bilateral pulmonary infiltrates (Fig. 2). Echocardiography upon admission confirmed a regular left ventricular ejection fraction of approximately 67% without any regional wall motion abnormalities.

Fig. 1

a 12-lead ECG recording on admission with normal sinus rhythm. b Complete right bundle branch block and an ST-elevation in lead aVR

Fig. 2

Chest X-ray with diffuse bilateral pulmonary infiltration

The patient´s regular medication consisted of aspirin 100 mg OD, candesartan 16 mg OD, bisoprolol 2.5 mg OD, atorvastatin 40 mg OD, ezetimibe 10 mg OD, empagliflozin 10 mg OD and metformin 2000 mg daily. Oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal swabs were positive for SARS-CoV-2 on real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase testing. The patient additionally received enoxaparin sodium 40 mg/day to prevent deep vein thrombosis.

After initial improvement of clinical symptoms, the patient complained of acute respiratory distress on day 3. The peripherally measured oxygen saturation had dropped to 78% despite oxygen delivered at 12 l/min were administered via a non-reservoir oxygen mask. Repeat laboratory values were: creatinine 1.17 mg/dl, eGFR 66.7 ml/m/1.73 m2, troponin T 105.3 pg/ml, CK 347 U/l, BNP 3054 pg/ml).

The patient was immediately transferred to ICU and an invasive ventilation initiated. Shortly after intubation, ventricular fibrillation occurred and was successfully terminated by electrical defibrillation. ECG recording (Fig. 1b) revealed a complete right bundle branch block with ST-elevation in lead aVR. Echocardiography revealed a severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction without valve impairment. A right heart strain or pericardial effusion was excluded. The patient then underwent urgent coronary angiography. Norepinephrine 1.8 µg kg−1 min−1 was sufficient to maintain a mean arterial blood pressure of 60 mmHg. The coronary angiography (Fig. 3) revealed a proximal occlusion of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) in a stented segment. After successful recanalization utilizing balloon dilation followed by stenting with a 3.0/28 mm and a 2.5/15 mm drug eluting stent (Zotarolimus/ABT-578), TIMI III flow was documented. Antiplatelet therapy with tirofiban and prasugrel was commenced and the loading dose applied immediately. The dual anti-platelet therapy with aspirin and prasugrel was administered via an orogastric tube. On ICU, a hemodynamic measurement system (PiCCO®, Pulsion Medical Systems AG, Munich, Germany) was established to adjust catecholamine doses and control fluid management. A post-interventional echocardiogram showed a left ventricular ejection fraction of approximately 35%. The cardiac power index (CPI) continuously stayed below 0.4 W/m2 over the first 5 days on ICU corresponding to a significantly reduced cardiac performance associated with poor prognosis. Lab results on day 1 post PCI were: creatinine 1.85 mg/dl, eGFR 39.3 ml/m/1.73 m2 troponin T > 10,000 pg/ml, CK 4570 U/l. The rising requirement for norepinephrine led to levosimendan being administered (0.1 µg kg−1 min−1 for 48 h). An episode of atrial fibrillation with a short hemodynamic worsening was treated successfully by electric cardioversion and cardiac rhythm was stabilised with amiodarone administration. After levosimendan was given, a short rise of CPI up to 0.43 on day 6 occurred.

Fig. 3

a Coronary angiography with 0–40 cranial angulation and documented total occlusion of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) in a stent segment. b Coronary angiography with 0–40 cranial angulation after revascularization with TIMI III flow

In summary, hemodynamic measurement revealed a mixed form of septic and cardiac shock due to septic and ischemic cardiomyopathy. On day 5 cyanosis of the extremities appeared and became more noticeable in subsequent days. Surprisingly, this was not associated with a significant increase of serum lactate levels, which remained between 1.0 and 2.5 mmol/l throughout the whole course of his admission to ICU. An association with norepinephrine use remained difficult to establish regarding doses mostly around 0.4 µg kg−1 min−1 culminating in day 2 at values around 0.7 µg kg−1 min−1, which were significantly reduced after levosimendan administration. No evidence was obtained for disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC). On day 5, a continuous decrease of renal activity (creatinine 3.95 mg/dl, eGFR 16.4 ml/m/1.73 m2) and oliguria of less than 20 ml /hour resulted in commencement of veno-venous hemodiafiltration with citrate (CVVHD-Ci-Ca). An acute renal failure occurred in association with a bacterial superinfection implied by rising procalcitonin levels (0.96 ng/ml) in the general context of a rapidly progressing multi organ failure. The patient was given antibiotic therapy with azithromycin (500 mg/day) and piperacillin/tazobactam (4.0 g + 0.5 g; four doses per day). The patient was sedated and ventilated (pressure-controlled ventilation, BIPAP-mode). The oxygenation index indicated a severe ARDS in line with the Berlin Definition of ARDS. In the subsequent days the oxygenation improved slightly.

In addition to the respiratory aspect a prolonged reduction of cardiac power in spite of levosimendan therapy and a low systemic vascular resistance made the hemodynamic situation unfavourable for use of a VA–ECMO. Nevertheless, hypoxemia remained the major problem, even in the context of an escalated ventilation with worsening oxygenation. On day 11 after admission to our hospital and on day 8 after admission to ICU, it was agreed that there should be no further escalation in treatment and only supportive care should be offered. The patient died later due to multi organ failure.

This report describes the case of a 65-year old male patient with acute myocardial infarction due to a documented stent thrombosis in a symptomatic COVID-19 patient. Insufficient data exist regarding the extent to which coronary artery disease contributes to morbidity and mortality of COVID-19 patients. Shaobo et al. [1] recently reported an association between COVID-19 infection and cardiac injury, resulting in a higher risk of in-hospital mortality than with either condition alone. The mechanisms of this observation remain uncertain. Previous research has demonstrated that influenza and other viral diseases precipitate coronary spasm, plaque ruptures or stent thrombosis by tachycardia, hypoxia, increased wall stress, procoagulation or inflammatory cytokine release [2-5]. Consistently, the term immunothrombosis was coined to describe thrombotic events triggered by inflammatory reactions [6]. A recent publication by Zhang et al. [7] describe the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies in COVID-19 patients, which may lead to thrombotic events. In this regard, the necessity of antiplatelet therapy or intensifying an established therapy in COVID-19 patients with pre-existing coronary heart disease or a history of stenting, especially recent stenting, remains the goal of further research.

Thus, a sudden onset of an unstable respiratory or hemodynamic condition in COVID-19 patients may be the symptomatic equivalent of an acute heart failure due to ischemia (as in our case) or myocarditis [8] and not necessarily due to a worsening of the pulmonary condition. Li et al. [9] report that 8.0% of COVID-19 patients suffer acute cardiac injury.

However, not all COVID patients presenting with deteriorating cardiac function display coronary artery disease. In contrast, a non-vascular cardiomyopathy with high troponin levels and accompanying ECG alterations has been described as a potential result of the cytokine storm in these patients, with high levels of interleukin-6 predicting worse prognosis [10].

Of note, the current STEMI guidelines consider a new complete right bundle branch block as sign of acute myocardial infarction [11]. In the treatment of COVID-19 patients, ECG and echocardiography are essential for rapid diagnosis and should be available on isolation wards and intensive care units. This case emphasizes the importance of cardiac monitoring and echocardiography which is of high relevance in all COVID-19 patients with rapid progression of symptoms. Stent thrombosis is a dramatic complication of coronary stenting, presenting as sudden death or acute myocardial infarction if missed or misdiagnosed [12]. An immediate revascularization is essential in order to prevent long-term cardiac impairment or death [13]. In COVID-19 patients, this even more important than in patients without accompanying diseases.

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (AVI 3248 kb)

Supplementary file2 (AVI 3942 kb)