Literature DB >> 32430622

Neurology and the COVID-19 emergency.

Alfredo Berardelli1,2, Vincenzo Silani3,4, Paolo Barone3,5, Paolo Calabresi3,6, Paolo Girlanda3,7, Leonardo Lopiano3,8, Luca Massacesi3,9, Salvatore Monaco3,10, Marco Onofrj3,11, Cristina Tassorelli3,12, Gioacchino Tedeschi3,13.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32430622      PMCID: PMC7235546          DOI: 10.1007/s10072-020-04465-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Sci        ISSN: 1590-1874            Impact factor:   3.307


× No keyword cloud information.
Following the COVID-19 outbreak, significant changes have been implemented on a national level in the organization of neurology units and associated stroke units. Regionally-designated COVID-19 hospitals have implemented an aggressive policy to relocate as many beds as possible to COVID-19 patients. In order to do so, the preferred strategy has been to reduce the number of beds in neurology units, and in some cases several units have been consolidated into one. In other cases, particularly in the northern regions, entire neurology units have been closed and converted into COVID-19 departments entrusted to other medical specialties. Some stroke units have followed the same path and become “hubs” and “spokes” for acute neurological pathology. In other situations, especially when it was necessary to meet the need for paramedical staff, the number of beds in neurology/stroke wards were significantly reduced and the nurses transferred to other units as needed to manage the COVID-19 emergency. During the COVID-19 emergency phase in March and April 2020, only patients with acute neurological diseases, including cerebrovascular disease, epilepsy, and other acute pathologies, were admitted to neurology units of COVID-19 hospitals. For all other patients with non-acute central and peripheral nervous system diseases, hospitalization was limited. Overall, the number of hospitalized neurological patients has undergone a drastic reduction. Some neurological patients have been hospitalized in non-COVID-19 hospitals or in other non-neurological wards, while a significant proportion of patients were forced to postpone their request for hospitalization. In addition to the reduced availability of beds, the COVID-19 emergency has also resulted in the suspension of neurological day hospitals, ambulatory care, complex outpatient activity, and outpatient clinics, as well as clinics dedicated to the diagnosis and treatment of specific categories of neurological patients (centers for epilepsy, neuromuscular diseases, movement disorders, dementia, headache, multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, etc.). In recent weeks, a slow but gradual reduction in the COVID-19 emergency has been observed, and consequently discussions are now taking place regarding the possible scaling down of the government’s restrictive measures across the country. Considering the importance and impact of neurological diseases on human health, it appears necessary to reopen, albeit gradually, all neurological hospital admissions throughout the country. Epidemiological data have overwhelmingly demonstrated the impact of neurological diseases on human health. Indeed, neurological diseases are among the leading causes of mortality (i.e. cerebral stroke) and many determine severe cognitive, mental, motor, and communication disabilities that may seriously limit the social functions of patients (neurodegenerative diseases) [1, 2]. A further aspect that should not be underestimated involves possible post-COVID-19 sequelae, which may require accurate follow-up over time, as previously suggested by encephalitis lethargica [3] and postpolio syndrome [4]. Neurology therefore has an urgent need to ensure an adequate number of dedicated beds in university and non-university hospitals in order to provide necessary care to a large number of patients. Besides acute neurological pathologies, neurological diseases include neurodegenerative conditions, complex diseases from a diagnostic and therapeutic point of view, and rare diseases that require specific experience and skills. All these conditions have a significant impact on society and families, who bear most of the burden in terms of care for these patients. For patients suffering from chronic neurological diseases, it is necessary to establish outpatient and dedicated care pathways where patients can be followed up periodically and where the effectiveness of therapeutic treatments in progress can be verified and monitored. The clinical course of these patients must also be able to accommodate scheduled admissions to neurology wards in the event of specific medical emergencies. Home healthcare also requires careful planning. The COVID-19 emergency has resulted in the total suspension of all healthcare assistance and therapeutic pathways, which must be reopened and restored as soon as possible. We need to prepare ourselves for the future and for other emergencies by putting into practice the use of digital technologies that allow remote clinical evaluation and follow-up of patients. The application of new technologies, particularly those that permit the evaluation of patients at home, is already urgently needed in order to reduce the influx of patients to clinics and referral centers so as to comply with social distancing requirements. COVID-19 reflects an unprecedented situation with a significant impact on the traditional organization of neurology on a national level. The awareness gained from this experience must propel us to carefully and proactively plan for the future so that the crucial role of neurology in managing emergencies and chronic degenerative diseases is safeguarded and optimized. The educational and proactive role of the academic component of the neurology field must serve as a point of reference, together with international and European regulations, in order to develop an adequate strategy for the future that takes into account the needs of the community, strategic changes, the contribution of new technologies, and the advancement of science.
  7 in total

1.  Experiencing COVID19 pandemic and neurology: learning by the recent reports and by old literary or scientific descriptions.

Authors:  Antonio Federico
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Heat risk exacerbation potential for neurology patients during the COVID-19 pandemic and related isolation.

Authors:  Alex Buoite Stella; Davide Filingeri; Nicholas Ravanelli; Shawnda A Morrison; Miloš Ajčević; Giovanni Furlanis; Paolo Manganotti
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2020-11-08       Impact factor: 3.787

3.  Telemedicine during the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic: A Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Outpatients Service Perspective.

Authors:  Francesco Corea; Silvia Ciotti; Antonella Cometa; Claudia De Carlo; Giancarlo Martini; Silvano Baratta; Mauro Zampolini
Journal:  Neurol Int       Date:  2021-01-18

4.  Priorities Towards Fair Allocation of Ventilators During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Delphi Study.

Authors:  Seyyed-Hadi Ghamari; Mohsen Abbasi-Kangevari; Nasim Zamani; Hossein Hassanian-Moghaddam; Ali-Asghar Kolahi
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-24

5.  The future of neurology after the COVID-19 pandemic according to neurology residents.

Authors:  Tommaso Ercoli; Francesco Barbato; Luca Cuffaro; Francesco Iodice; Michele Romoli; Gioacchino Tedeschi; Alfredo Berardelli; Francesco Di Lorenzo; Alessandro Bombaci
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 3.830

6.  Leveraging Trends in Neurology Admissions for Departmental Planning During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  K H Vincent Lau; Pria Anand; David M Greer; Anna Cervantes-Arslanian; Sheila Phicil; Jesse Moore; Courtney Takahashi
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2020-09-22

Review 7.  Ethical considerations in neurology during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Tabary; Ruhollah Abolhasani; Farnaz Araghi; Armin Aryannejad; Behnam Safarpour Lima
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.307

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.