Literature DB >> 32430594

Addressing Manufacturing Challenges for Commercialization of iPSC-Based Therapies.

Mehdi Dashtban1, Krishna Morgan Panchalingam1, Mehdi Shafa1, Behnam Ahmadian Baghbaderani2.   

Abstract

The development of reprogramming technology to generate human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) has tremendously influenced the field of regenerative medicine and clinical therapeutics where curative cell replacement therapies can be used in the treatment of devastating diseases such as Parkinson's disease (PD) and diabetes. In order to commercialize these therapies to treat a large number of individuals, it is important to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of these therapies and ensure that the manufacturing process for iPSC-derived functional cells can be industrialized at an affordable cost. However, there are a number of manufacturing obstacles that need to be addressed in order to meet this vision. It is important to note that the manufacturing process for generation of iPSC-derived specialized cells is relatively long and fairly complex and requires differentiation of high-quality iPSCs into specialized cells in a controlled manner. In this chapter, we have summarized our efforts to address the main challenges present in the industrialization of iPSC-derived cell therapy products with focus on the development of a current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP)-compliant iPSC manufacturing process, a comprehensive iPSC characterization platform, long-term stability of cGMP compliant iPSCs, and innovative technologies to address some of the scale-up challenges in establishment of iPSC processing in 3D computer-controlled bioreactors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D computer-controlled bioreactors; Cell therapy; Commercialization; Induced pluripotent stem cells; Process development; cGMP

Year:  2021        PMID: 32430594     DOI: 10.1007/7651_2020_288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  36 in total

Review 1.  Scalable human ES culture for therapeutic use: propagation, differentiation, genetic modification and regulatory issues.

Authors:  M Rao
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 2.  Induced pluripotent stem cell technology: a decade of progress.

Authors:  Yanhong Shi; Haruhisa Inoue; Joseph C Wu; Shinya Yamanaka
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Modeling familial cancer with induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Dung-Fang Lee; Jie Su; Huen Suk Kim; Betty Chang; Dmitri Papatsenko; Ruiying Zhao; Ye Yuan; Julian Gingold; Weiya Xia; Henia Darr; Razmik Mirzayans; Mien-Chie Hung; Christoph Schaniel; Ihor R Lemischka
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Scalable GMP compliant suspension culture system for human ES cells.

Authors:  Vincent C Chen; Sylvana M Couture; Jingjing Ye; Ziguang Lin; Giau Hua; Hsiao-I P Huang; Jun Wu; David Hsu; Melissa K Carpenter; Larry A Couture
Journal:  Stem Cell Res       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 2.020

5.  Derivation of a xeno-free human embryonic stem cell line.

Authors:  Catharina Ellerström; Raimund Strehl; Karina Moya; Katarina Andersson; Christina Bergh; Kersti Lundin; Johan Hyllner; Henrik Semb
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 6.277

Review 6.  Alternative sources of pluripotent stem cells: scientific solutions to an ethical dilemma.

Authors:  Mahendra Rao; Maureen L Condic
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.272

7.  Induced pluripotent stem cells from a spinal muscular atrophy patient.

Authors:  Allison D Ebert; Junying Yu; Ferrill F Rose; Virginia B Mattis; Christian L Lorson; James A Thomson; Clive N Svendsen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-12-21       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Modeling ALS with motor neurons derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Samuel Sances; Lucie I Bruijn; Siddharthan Chandran; Kevin Eggan; Ritchie Ho; Joseph R Klim; Matt R Livesey; Emily Lowry; Jeffrey D Macklis; David Rushton; Cameron Sadegh; Dhruv Sareen; Hynek Wichterle; Su-Chun Zhang; Clive N Svendsen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 9.  Human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells in clinical trials.

Authors:  Dusko Ilic; Liani Devito; Cristian Miere; Stefano Codognotto
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.291

10.  Disease-specific induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  In-Hyun Park; Natasha Arora; Hongguang Huo; Nimet Maherali; Tim Ahfeldt; Akiko Shimamura; M William Lensch; Chad Cowan; Konrad Hochedlinger; George Q Daley
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Emerging NK cell therapies for cancer and the promise of next generation engineering of iPSC-derived NK cells.

Authors:  Sainiteesh Maddineni; John L Silberstein; John B Sunwoo
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 12.469

Review 2.  Advances in Manufacturing Cardiomyocytes from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Authors:  Martha E Floy; Fathima Shabnam; Aaron D Simmons; Vijesh J Bhute; Gyuhyung Jin; Will A Friedrich; Alexandra B Steinberg; Sean P Palecek
Journal:  Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 9.700

Review 3.  Utility of Common Marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) Embryonic Stem Cells in Liver Disease Modeling, Tissue Engineering and Drug Metabolism.

Authors:  Rajagopal N Aravalli; Clifford J Steer
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 4.  Manufacturing clinical-grade human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived beta cells for diabetes treatment.

Authors:  Lay Shuen Tan; Juin Ting Chen; Lillian Yuxian Lim; Adrian Kee Keong Teo
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 8.755

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.