Literature DB >> 32430380

Primary Care Physician Factors Associated with Inbox Message Volume.

David Margolius1, Jonathan Siff2, Kathryn Teng2, Douglas Einstadter2, Douglas Gunzler2, Shari Bolen2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to better understand the relationship between panel size, full-time status, and estimated socioeconomic status of a patient panel with types and number of primary care clinician inbox messages.
METHODS: The study used data from the Epic Signal database to examine inbox volume and types of messages for 86 primary care clinicians at 19 primary care sites. We measured correlations and performed multiple regression analysis to understand the relationship between inbox volume and types of messages and 3 factors: panel size, full-time status, and estimated socioeconomic status of patient panels.
RESULTS: The study found positive correlation between the number of messages and panel size, full-time status, and estimated socioeconomic status of patient panels. The number of patient portal messages generated from patient panels with higher socioeconomic status accounted for the positive correlation in total inbox messages and that factor. DISCUSSION: These findings contribute to our understanding of primary care workload, specifically as it relates to panel size, full-time status, and patient panel socioeconomic status. Increase in clinical time or panel size needs to come with trained team members or additional time to address inbox messages. © Copyright 2020 by the American Board of Family Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient Portals; Primary Health Care; Regression Analysis; Socioeconomic Status; Workload

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32430380     DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.03.190360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med        ISSN: 1557-2625            Impact factor:   2.657


  2 in total

1.  Direct Secure Messaging in Practice-Recommendations for Improvements.

Authors:  Simone Arvisais-Anhalt; Kathryn Ayers Wickenhauser; Katherine Lusk; Christoph U Lehmann; James L McCormack; Kristian Feterik
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 2.762

Review 2.  Quantifying Patient Portal Use: Systematic Review of Utilization Metrics.

Authors:  Terri Menser; Lauren L Beal; Jacob M Kolman; Stephen L Jones; Aroub Khleif
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 5.428

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.