Dan Bai1, Natasha Marrus2, Benjamin Hon Kei Yip3, Abraham Reichenberg4, John N Constantino5, Sven Sandin6. 1. Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. 3. Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 4. Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Seaver Autism Center for Research and Treatment, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Mindich Child Health and Development Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York. 5. Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. 6. Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Seaver Autism Center for Research and Treatment, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York. Electronic address: sven.sandin@ki.se.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is highly familial, with a positively skewed male-to-female ratio that is purported to arise from the so-called female protective effect. A serious implication of a female protective effect is that familial ASD liability would be expected to aggregate asymptomatically in sisters of affected probands, who would incur elevated rates of ASD among their offspring. Currently, there exist no data on second-generation recurrence rates among families affected by ASD. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Swedish National Patient Register and the Multi-Generation Register for a cohort of children born between 2003 and 2012. ASD was ascertained in both the child and parental generations. RESULTS: Among 847,732 children, 13,103 (1.55%) children in the cohort were diagnosed with ASD. Among their maternal/paternal aunts and uncles, 1744 (0.24%) and 1374 (0.18%) were diagnosed with ASD, respectively. Offspring of mothers with a sibling(s) diagnosed with ASD had higher rates of ASD than the general population (relative risk, 3.05; 95% confidence interval, 2.52-3.64), but not more than would be predicted for second-degree relatives within a generation, and only slightly more than was observed for fathers with siblings with ASD (relative risk, 2.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.53-2.67). Models adjusting for temporal trends and for psychiatric history in the parental generation did not alter the results. CONCLUSIONS: These findings establish a robust general estimate of ASD transmission risk for siblings of individuals affected by ASD, the first ever reported. Our findings do not suggest female protective factors as the principal mechanism underlying the male sex bias in ASD.
BACKGROUND:Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is highly familial, with a positively skewed male-to-female ratio that is purported to arise from the so-called female protective effect. A serious implication of a female protective effect is that familial ASD liability would be expected to aggregate asymptomatically in sisters of affected probands, who would incur elevated rates of ASD among their offspring. Currently, there exist no data on second-generation recurrence rates among families affected by ASD. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Swedish National Patient Register and the Multi-Generation Register for a cohort of children born between 2003 and 2012. ASD was ascertained in both the child and parental generations. RESULTS: Among 847,732 children, 13,103 (1.55%) children in the cohort were diagnosed with ASD. Among their maternal/paternal aunts and uncles, 1744 (0.24%) and 1374 (0.18%) were diagnosed with ASD, respectively. Offspring of mothers with a sibling(s) diagnosed with ASD had higher rates of ASD than the general population (relative risk, 3.05; 95% confidence interval, 2.52-3.64), but not more than would be predicted for second-degree relatives within a generation, and only slightly more than was observed for fathers with siblings with ASD (relative risk, 2.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.53-2.67). Models adjusting for temporal trends and for psychiatric history in the parental generation did not alter the results. CONCLUSIONS: These findings establish a robust general estimate of ASD transmission risk for siblings of individuals affected by ASD, the first ever reported. Our findings do not suggest female protective factors as the principal mechanism underlying the male sex bias in ASD.
Authors: Ryan K C Yuen; Bhooma Thiruvahindrapuram; Daniele Merico; Susan Walker; Kristiina Tammimies; Ny Hoang; Christina Chrysler; Thomas Nalpathamkalam; Giovanna Pellecchia; Yi Liu; Matthew J Gazzellone; Lia D'Abate; Eric Deneault; Jennifer L Howe; Richard S C Liu; Ann Thompson; Mehdi Zarrei; Mohammed Uddin; Christian R Marshall; Robert H Ring; Lonnie Zwaigenbaum; Peter N Ray; Rosanna Weksberg; Melissa T Carter; Bridget A Fernandez; Wendy Roberts; Peter Szatmari; Stephen W Scherer Journal: Nat Med Date: 2015-01-26 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Dan Levy; Michael Ronemus; Boris Yamrom; Yoon-ha Lee; Anthony Leotta; Jude Kendall; Steven Marks; B Lakshmi; Deepa Pai; Kenny Ye; Andreas Buja; Abba Krieger; Seungtai Yoon; Jennifer Troge; Linda Rodgers; Ivan Iossifov; Michael Wigler Journal: Neuron Date: 2011-06-09 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Gudrun Nygren; Eva Sandberg; Fredrik Gillstedt; Gunnar Ekeroth; Thomas Arvidsson; Christopher Gillberg Journal: Res Dev Disabil Date: 2012-03-22
Authors: Dan Bai; Benjamin Hon Kei Yip; Gayle C Windham; Andre Sourander; Richard Francis; Rinat Yoffe; Emma Glasson; Behrang Mahjani; Auli Suominen; Helen Leonard; Mika Gissler; Joseph D Buxbaum; Kingsley Wong; Diana Schendel; Arad Kodesh; Michaeline Breshnahan; Stephen Z Levine; Erik T Parner; Stefan N Hansen; Christina Hultman; Abraham Reichenberg; Sven Sandin Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Deborah L Christensen; Kim Van Naarden Braun; Jon Baio; Deborah Bilder; Jane Charles; John N Constantino; Julie Daniels; Maureen S Durkin; Robert T Fitzgerald; Margaret Kurzius-Spencer; Li-Ching Lee; Sydney Pettygrove; Cordelia Robinson; Eldon Schulz; Chris Wells; Martha S Wingate; Walter Zahorodny; Marshalyn Yeargin-Allsopp Journal: MMWR Surveill Summ Date: 2018-11-16
Authors: Natasha Marrus; Tychele N Turner; Elizabeth Forsen; Drew Bolster; Alison Marvin; Andrew Whitehouse; Laura Klinger; Christina A Gurnett; J N Constantino Journal: J Neurodev Disord Date: 2021-09-16 Impact factor: 4.025
Authors: Rebecca Richards Steed; Amanda V Bakian; Ken Robert Smith; Neng Wan; Simon Brewer; Richard Medina; James VanDerslice Journal: Int J Health Geogr Date: 2022-10-03 Impact factor: 5.310
Authors: Jennifer Cable; Ryan H Purcell; Elise Robinson; Jacob A S Vorstman; Wendy K Chung; John N Constantino; Stephan J Sanders; Mustafa Sahin; Ricardo E Dolmetsch; Bina Maniar Shah; Audrey Thurm; Christa L Martin; Carrie E Bearden; Jennifer G Mulle Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2021-08-02 Impact factor: 6.499
Authors: Adam T Eggebrecht; Ally Dworetsky; Zoë Hawks; Rebecca Coalson; Babatunde Adeyemo; Savannah Davis; Daniel Gray; Alana McMichael; Steven E Petersen; John N Constantino; John R Pruett Journal: Mol Autism Date: 2020-10-20 Impact factor: 7.509