| Literature DB >> 32429434 |
Marcello Picollo1, Costanza Cucci1, Andrea Casini1, Lorenzo Stefani1.
Abstract
Imaging spectroscopy technique was introduced in the cultural heritage field in the 1990s, when a multi-spectral imaging system based on a Vidicon camera was used to identify and map pigments in paintings. Since then, with continuous improvements in imaging technology, the quality of spectroscopic information in the acquired imaging data has greatly increased. Moreover, with the progressive transition from multispectral to hyperspectral imaging techniques, numerous new applicative perspectives have become possible, ranging from non-invasive monitoring to high-quality documentation, such as mapping and characterization of polychrome and multi-material surfaces of cultural properties. This article provides a brief overview of recent developments in the rapidly evolving applications of hyperspectral imaging in this field. The fundamentals of the various strategies, that have been developed for applying this technique to different types of artworks are discussed, together with some examples of recent applications.Entities:
Keywords: Vis-NIR-SWIR imaging spectroscopy; hyper-spectral imaging; mapping materials; multivariate analysis; non-invasive analytical technique
Year: 2020 PMID: 32429434 PMCID: PMC7287632 DOI: 10.3390/s20102843
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1(a) sRGB image of the investigated frame; (b) UMAP image with the selected five sub-sets of fairly distinct pixels (highlighted in red, green, blue, cyan, and yellow); (c) spectra extracted from the data-cube representative of the UMAP five classes reported in (b); (d) displacement of the UMAP five classes on the HSI reconstructed visible image.
Figure 2From left to right: sRGB of the Lazarus detail reconstructed from the HSI data at the end of the restoration procedure with the spots whose colorimetric values are reported in Table 1; images in grey scale of the b* colorimetric values before restoration; after being restored; image difference: ∆b* colorimetric values (after–before).
Colorimetric values on three selected spots (average of 5 × 5 pixel, spectral acquisition sampled by 2) calculated from the spectra extracted by the cube-files acquired before (L*b, a*b, b*b) and after (L*a, a*a, b*a) the restoration process. CIE standard 2° observer and D65 illuminant, CIEDE2000 color-difference formula [57].
| Spot | L*b | L*a | ∆L* | a*b | a*a | ∆a* | b*b | b*a | ∆b* | ∆E00 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27.26 | 28.05 | 0.79 | 2.91 | 4.17 | 1.26 | 6.14 | 1.99 | −4.15 | 4.24 |
| 2 | 32.62 | 35.06 | 2.44 | 27.82 | 34.97 | 7.15 | 20.66 | 29.20 | 8.54 | 4.64 |
| 3 | 23.65 | 42.94 | 19.29 | 8.89 | 14.33 | 5.44 | 9.56 | 31.65 | 22.09 | 19.58 |
Coordinates of the spots in the image: (1) x = 250, y = 239; (2) x = 280, y = 310; (3) x = 340, y = 415.
Figure 3(a) Specim IQ hyper-spectral camera; (b) image displayed in the camera’s screen with the pixel’s reflectance spectrum; (c) cobalt blue distribution map provided by the SAM algorithm in the camera software (in white) on the painting’s surface (figure modified from [60]).