| Literature DB >> 32429420 |
Muhammad Amjad1, Saeed Badshah1, Amer Farhan Rafique2, Muhammad Adil Khattak3, Rafi Ullah Khan1, Wail Ismail Abdullah Harasani2.
Abstract
Implants are widely used in the human body for the replacement of affected bones. Fatigue failure is one of the serious concerns for implants. Therefore, understanding of the underlying mechanism leading to fatigue failure is important for the longevity of biomaterial implants. In this paper, the fracture toughness and fatigue crack growth of titanium alloy biomaterial Ti-27Nb has been experimentally investigated. The Ti-27Nb material is tested for fatigue crack growth in different environmental conditions representing the ambient and in vitro environments for 504 hours and 816 hours, respectively. Fractography of the tested specimen is conducted using Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). The results of the fatigue crack growth propagation of the ambient and in vitro samples are similar in the Paris crack growth region. However, in the threshold region, the crack growth rate is higher for the Simulated Body Fluid (SBF) treated specimen. The fracture surface morphology of in vitro samples shows brittle fracture as compared to ambient specimens with significant plasticity and striations marks. It is proposed that a similar investigation may be conducted with specimens treated in SBF for prolonged periods to further ascertain the findings of this study.Entities:
Keywords: Titanium alloys; fatigue crack growth behavior; fracture toughness; microstructure; simulated body fluid
Year: 2020 PMID: 32429420 PMCID: PMC7287680 DOI: 10.3390/ma13102299
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) result of the fractured surface of as received sample.
The mechanical properties of Ti-27Nb [19].
| Mechanical Properties | Values |
|---|---|
| Yield strength (MPa) | 740 |
| Ultimate tensile strength (MPa) | 860 |
| Elastic modulus (GPa) | 86 |
| Poisson’s Ratio | 0.3 |
The test matrix for fracture and fatigue crack growth test of Ti-27Nb.
| S No | Specimen Code | Thickness (mm) | Width (mm) | SBF | Experiment Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| as Received | |||||
| 1 | FR 1 | 3 | 42 | No | Fracture toughness |
| 2 | FR 2 | 3 | 42 | No | Fracture toughness |
| 3 | FR 3 | 3 | 42 | No | Fracture toughness |
| 4 | FT 1 | 3 | 31.20 | No | Fatigue |
| 5 | FT 2 | 3 | 31.20 | No | Fatigue |
| 6 | FT 3 | 3 | 31.20 | No | Fatigue |
| 7 | FT 4 | 3 | 31.20 | 504 hrs. | Fatigue |
| 8 | FT 5 | 3 | 31.20 | 504 hrs. | Fatigue |
| 9 | FT 6 | 3 | 31.20 | 504 hrs. | Fatigue |
| 10 | FT 7 | 3 | 31.20 | 816 hrs. | Fatigue |
| 11 | FT 8 | 3 | 31.20 | 816 hrs. | Fatigue |
| 12 | FT 9 | 3 | 31.20 | 816 hrs. | Fatigue |
Figure 2CT specimens for Fracture Toughness Test (a) Geometry of the specimen (b) Photograph of in-test specimens.
Figure 3CT Specimen for fatigue crack growth test (a) Geometry of the specimen (b) Photograph of in-test specimens.
Figure 4Jars containing specimens in Simulated Body Fluid (SBF) with heating filament for maintaining temperature.
Order amounts, weighing containers, purities, and formula of reagent for preparing 1000 mL SBF [20].
| Order | Reagent | Amount | Container | Purity (%) | Formula Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NaCl | 8.035 g | Weighing paper | 99.5 | 58.443 |
| 2 | NaHCO3 | 0.355 g | Weighing paper | 99.5 | 84.0068 |
| 3 | KCl | 0.225 g | Weighing bottle | 99.5 | 74.5515 |
| 4 | K2HPO4.3H2O | 0.231 g | Weighing bottle | 99 | 228.222 |
| 5 | MgCl2.6H2O | 0.311 g | Weighing bottle | 98 | 203.3034 |
| 6 | 1.0M-HCl | 39 ml | Graduated cylinder | — | — |
| 7 | CaCl2 | 0.292 g | Weighing bottle | 95 | 110.9848 |
| 8 | Na2SO4 | 0.072 g | Weighing bottle | 99 | 142.0428 |
| 9 | Tris | 6.118 g | Weighing paper | 99 | 121.1356 |
| 10 | 1.0M-HCl | 0–5 ml | Syringe | — | — |
Figure 5Load vs. crack mouth displacement.
Figure 6da/dN vs. ∆K results for the ambient, 504-, and 816-hr samples in simulated body fluid (SBF). Power in Figure shows that the curve fit has been achieved using the power law.
Figure 7Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) micrograph of the Ti-27Nb specimen tested under fatigue load. (a) The surface microstructure shows Widmanstätten lath structure, (b) the deflection and branching of crack (c,d) fracture surface.
Figure 8SEM fracture surface micrograph of Ti-27Nb specimen placed in human body fluids (a,b) for 504 hrs. and (c,d) for 816 hrs.