| Literature DB >> 32429326 |
Bin Feng1, Di Wang1,2, Yuhui Li1, Junpeng Qian1, Chenlei Yu1, Mingsi Wang1, Danni Luo1, Shuangying Wei1,2.
Abstract
Changing demands have led to rapidly growing interest in the modification of waterborne wood coatings. To improve the performance of a polyacrylate wood coating, especially the strength, hardness, and abrasion resistance of the film, a soy protein isolate-grafted-acrylate (SGA) copolymer was prepared in an aqueous solution with ammonium persulfate (APS) as an initiator and sodium pyrosulfite (SPS) as an unfolding agent for the soybean protein isolate (SPI). The emulsion was characterized using transmission electron microscopy, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and a particle size analyzer. Furthermore, the mechanical properties of the film, including the tensile strength, elastic modulus, elongation at break, and pencil hardness, were measured. The results showed that the glass transition temperature of the polyacrylic resin decreased to 35 °C after the SPI grafting. The elastic modulus of the film increased from 0.317 to 46.949 MPa, and the elongation at break decreased from 453.133% to 187.125% as the addition of SPI varied from 0 to 4 g, respectively. The pencil hardness of the wood coating increased from HB to 3H. This paper proposes a feasible route for the utilization of SPI for wood coatings.Entities:
Keywords: graft copolymerization; polyacrylate; soy protein isolate; waterborne wood coating
Year: 2020 PMID: 32429326 PMCID: PMC7285111 DOI: 10.3390/polym12051137
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Synthesis of soybean protein isolate (SPI)-modified polyacrylate.
Grafting ratio of soy protein isolate–grafted–acrylate (SGA) with different SPI content.
| Group | A1 | A2 | A3 | A4 | A5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| / | 43% | 40% | 45% | 49% |
FTIR spectra of the polyacrylate and SGA.
| FTIR Band | Attribution Group |
|---|---|
| 3463 cm−1 | stretching vibrations of the O-H and N-H groups (SPI) |
| 1736 cm−1 | C=O stretching of the ester carbonyl (polyacrylate) |
| 1663 cm−1 | amide I (C=O stretching vibration) (SPI) |
| 1541 cm−1 | amide II(N–H bending and C–N stretching vibrations) (SPI) |
| 1460 cm−1 | methyl and methylene groups(polyacrylate) |
| 1152 cm−1 | C-O stretching of the corresponding ester (polyacrylate) |
Figure 2FTIR spectra of polyacrylate and SGA.
Figure 3TEM image of the polyacrylic emulsion and SGA: (a) polyacrylate, (b) graft copolymer SGA.
Figure 4Particle size distribution curve of emulsion.
Figure 5Storage modulus (E’) and the damping coefficient (tanδ) of the films. (Note: the film fabricated with 6 g of SPI was too brittle to be tested using dynamical mechanical analysis (DMA)).
Crosslinking density of films with different SPI content.
| 0 g SPI | 1 g SPI | 3 g SPI | 4g SPI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tg (°C) (tanδ max from DMA) | 41.4 | 45.4 | 38.8 | 35.0 |
| Storage modulus (E’) (MPa) at 25 °C (glassy state) | 38.12 | 68.59 | 105.99 | 25.91 |
| Storage modulus (E’) (MPa) at Tg + 40 °C (rubbery state) | 0.20 | 2.52 | 3.09 | 2.41 |
| νe (× 103 mol m−3) | 0.02 | 0.28 | 0.35 | 0.28 |
Figure 6Stress–strain curves of copolymers.
Mechanical properties of copolymers with different SPI mass fractions.
| Group | Soy Protein Fraction in Copolymer (%) | Elastic Modulus (MPa) | Elongation at Break (%) | Tensile Strength (MPa) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | 0 | 0.3170 | 453.133 | 0.385 |
| A2 | 1.72 | 33.515 | 335.137 | 2.955 |
| A3 | 5.75 | 41.558 | 240.353 | 3.064 |
| A4 | 7.28 | 46.949 | 187.125 | 4.775 |
| A5 | 11.38 | 102.343 | 21.416 | 3.045 |
Wear resistance, adhesion, gloss, and pencil hardness of the paint film with different SPI additions.
| Group | Abrasion Loss of 100 Revolutions (g) | Adhesion (Level) | Gloss 60° (Value) | Pencil Hardness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.032 | 0 | 48.2 | HB |
|
| 0.015 | 0 | 55.1 | HB |
|
| 0.023 | 1 | 65.1 | 2H |
|
| 0.022 | 1 | 67.3 | 3H |
|
| 0.020 | 2 | 66.7 | 3H |