| Literature DB >> 32429289 |
Zhicheng Huang1, Xingguo Wang1, Nanxing Wu1, Fulei Chu2, Jing Luo3.
Abstract
Athree-layer composite plate element is developed for finite element modeling and vibration analysis of sandwich plate with frequency-dependent viscoelastic material core. The plate element is quadrilateral element bounded by four-node with 7-degree-of-freedom per node. The frequency-dependent characteristics of viscoelastic material parameters are described using the Biot model. The method of identifying the parameters of the Biot model is given. By introducing auxiliary coordinates, the Biot model is combined with the finite element equation of the viscoelastic sandwich plate. Through a series of mathematical transformations, the equation is transformed into a standard second-order steady linear system equation form to simplify the solution process. Finally, the vibration characteristics of the viscoelastic sandwich plate are analyzed and experimentally studied. The results show that the method in this paper is correct and reliable, and it has certain reference and application value for solving similar engineering vibration problems.Entities:
Keywords: Biot model; finite element method; vibration characteristics; viscoelastic material; viscoelastic sandwich plate
Year: 2020 PMID: 32429289 PMCID: PMC7288149 DOI: 10.3390/ma13102296
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Viscoelastic sandwich plate structure.
Figure 2Geometry and deformation of sandwich plate.
Figure 3The element of sandwich plate.
Figure 4The boundary condition of the sandwich plate.
Material and geometric parameters of the sandwich plate.
| Material Properties | Constraining Layer | Base Plate | Viscoelastic Core |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elastic Modulus(GPa) | 71 | 71 | 0.000896 |
| Density(kg/m3) | 2700 | 2700 | 999 |
| Poisson’s ratio | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.498 |
| Loss factor | - | - | 0.9683 |
| Thickness (mm) | 1.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 |
| Length (mm) | 400 | 400 | 400 |
| Width (mm) | 400 | 400 | 400 |
The frequencies and loss factors versus the number of elements.
| Modes | 9 Element (3 × 3) | 16Element (4 × 4) | 25Element (5 × 5) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1 | 95.96 | 0.1331 | 95.09 | 0.1315 | 94.97 | 0.1295 |
| 2 | 112.93 | 0.1303 | 112.70 | 0.1274 | 112.70 | 0.1270 |
| 3 | 187.62 | 0.1431 | 187.25 | 0.1397 | 187.24 | 0.1402 |
Geometric and material parameters of cantilever viscoelastic sandwich plate.
| Material Properties | Constraining Layer | Base Plate | Viscoelastic Layer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Young’s modulus(GPa) | 68.7 | 68.7 | Frequency-dependent |
| Density(kg/m3) | 2690 | 2690 | 795 |
| Poisson’s ratio | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Thickness (mm) | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| Length (mm) | |||
| Width (mm) | 24 | 24 | 24 |
The Biot model parameters of viscoelastic materials.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 2.8378 | 151.9889 |
| 2 | 0.0552 | 151.9900 | |
| 3 | 2.6365 | 2.3122e6 |
Figure 5The fitting of the real part.
Figure 6The fitting of the real part.
Figure 7The fitting errors of the real and imaginary parts.
The first three natural frequencies and loss factors of viscoelastic sandwich plates of different lengths: comparison of experimental values and numerical simulation results.
| Length | Modal Order | Experimental | Results of the Finite Element Method of This Paper | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natural Frequency (Hz) | Loss Factor | Natural Frequency (Hz) | Error (%) | Loss Factor | Error (%) | ||
| 1 | 16.95 | 0.1748 | 17.20 | 1.77 | 0.1790 | 2.40 | |
| 2 | 79.33 | 0.1350 | 80.51 | 1.48 | 0.1382 | 2.37 | |
| 3 | 184.44 | 0.0765 | 187.80 | 1.82 | 0.0791 | 3.40 | |
| 1 | 7.55 | 0.1770 | 7.65 | 1.32 | 0.1818 | 2.71 | |
| 2 | 37.13 | 0.1768 | 38.00 | 2.34 | 0.1807 | 2.21 | |
| 3 | 93.18 | 0.0788 | 95.52 | 2.51 | 0.0808 | 2.54 | |
| 1 | 5.05 | 0.1434 | 5.12 | 1.38 | 0.1431 | 2.10 | |
| 2 | 24.54 | 0.1508 | 25.03 | 2.00 | 0.1540 | 2.12 | |
| 3 | 60.13 | 0.1754 | 61.54 | 2.34 | 0.1819 | 3.71 | |
Comparison of the numerical simulation results of the GHM-based sandwich finite element model and the finite element method of this paper.
| Length | Modal Order | Results of the GHM-Based Sandwich Finite Element Model [ | Results of the Finite Element Method of This Paper | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natural Frequency (Hz) | Natural Frequency (Hz) | Error (%) | ||
| 1 | 14.86 | 17.20 | 13.6 | |
| 2 | 88.75 | 80.51 | 10.2 | |
| 3 | 166.83 | 187.80 | 11.2 | |
| 1 | 6.61 | 7.65 | 13.4 | |
| 2 | 32.05 | 38.00 | 15.6 | |
| 3 | 83.16 | 95.52 | 12.4 | |
| 1 | 4.32 | 5.12 | 15.6 | |
| 2 | 22.88 | 25.03 | 8.6 | |
| 3 | 53.66 | 61.54 | 12.8 | |
Figure 8The schematic diagram of the experimental set-up.
Physical and geometrical properties of the base plate, the viscoelastic layer and the constraining layer.
| Material Properties | Constraining Layer | Base Plate | Viscoelastic Layer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Young’s modulus(GPa) | 71 | 210 | Frequency-dependent |
| Density(kg/m3) | 2710 | 7850 | 1000 |
| Poisson’s ratio | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Thickness (mm) | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Natural frequencies and loss factors of the sandwich plate.
| Mode | Experimental | Finite Element Model | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natural Frequencies | Loss | Natural Frequencies | Error | Loss | Error | |
| 1 | 24.73 | 0.218 | 25.21 | 1.9 | 0.228 | 4.6 |
| 2 | 69.17 | 0.098 | 71.00 | 2.6 | 0.102 | 4.1 |