| Literature DB >> 32429191 |
Qianqian Wang1, Chencheng Ji1, Lushan Sun2, Jianzhong Sun1, Jun Liu1.
Abstract
As direct digital manufacturing, 3D printing (3DP) technology provides new development directions and opportunities for the high-value utilization of a wide range of biological materials. Cellulose nanofibrils (CNF) and polylactic acid (PLA) biocomposite filaments for fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3DP were developed in this study. Firstly, CNF was isolated by enzymatic hydrolysis combined with high-pressure homogenization. CNF/PLA filaments were then prepared by melt-extrusion of PLA as the matrix and CNF as the filler. Thermal stability, mechanical performance, and water absorption property of biocomposite filaments and 3D-printed objects were analyzed. Findings showed that CNF increased the thermal stability of the PLA/PEG600/CNF composite. Compared to unfilled PLA FDM filaments, the CNF filled PLA biocomposite filament showed an increase of 33% in tensile strength and 19% in elongation at break, suggesting better compatibility for desktop FDM 3DP. This study provided a new potential for the high-value utilization of CNF in 3DP in consumer product applications.Entities:
Keywords: 3D printing; biocomposite filaments; cellulose nanofibrils; melt extrusion; physical property
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32429191 PMCID: PMC7287905 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25102319
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Cellulose nanofibrils (CNF) powder: (a) composite filament extruded on Wellzoom desktop extruder; (b) composite filament (1.75 mm diameter); (c) specimen in printing on M3036 FDM desktop 3D printer; (d) 3D-printed specimen with 10% and 35% infill; (e) 3D-printed specimen monkey face with 40 mm/s printing speed and 100% infill (f).
Figure 2FTIR Spectrum of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) and CNF. (a) TEM images of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose with high-pressure homogenization under different scales. (b) and (c) after 10 passes through the homogenizer. FE-SEM micrographs of CNF at a magnification of 20,000 (d) after freeze-drying and (e) after mechanical dispersion (following freeze drying).
Weight loss temperature of MCC, CNF, PLA, PLA/PEG, and PLA/PEG/CNF composites.
| Specimen * | Tonset(°C) | T5%(°C) | T10%(°C) | T50%(°C) | Tvmax(°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCC | 353 | 301 | 340 | 371 | 372 |
| CNF | 321 | 257 | 292 | 362 | 369 |
| PLA | 311 | 308 | 316 | 340 | 346 |
| PLA/PEG | 295 | 267 | 284 | 321 | 330 |
| PLA/PEG/CNF 1 wt.% | 320 | 298 | 312 | 350 | 361 |
| PLA/PEG/CNF 2.5 wt.% | 311 | 290 | 304 | 344 | 352 |
| PLA/PEG/CNF 5 wt.% | 302 | 273 | 288 | 328 | 335 |
*: PLA/PEG/CNF 1 wt.%, PLA/PEG/CNF 2.5 wt.%, PLA/PEG/CNF 5 wt.% means CNF loading were 1, 2.5 and 5 wt.%, respectively.
Figure 3TGA analysis of MCC and CNF: (a) TG curves, (b) DTG curves; TGA analysis of virgin polylactic acid (PLA) and composites with different wt.% CNF: (c) TG curves and (d) DTG curves.
Figure 4(a) Tensile properties of PLA/PEG/CNF composites with different CNF loading; (b) FE-SEM micrographs of cross-section of virgin PLA; (c) PLA/PEG/CNF 1 wt.%; (d) PLA/PEG/ CNF 2.5 wt.%; (e) PLA/PEG/CNF 5 wt.%. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Figure 5(a) Water absorption rate of virgin PLA; (b) PLA/PEG; (c) PLA/PEG/CNF 1 wt.%; (d) PLA/PEG/CNF 2.5 wt.%; (e) PLA/PEG/CNF 5 wt.%.