Literature DB >> 32429170

The Influence of DNA Extraction and Lipid Removal on Human Milk Bacterial Profiles.

Anna Ojo-Okunola1, Shantelle Claassen-Weitz1, Kilaza S Mwaikono2,3, Sugnet Gardner-Lubbe4, Heather J Zar5,6,7, Mark P Nicol1,8, Elloise du Toit1.   

Abstract

Culture-independent molecular techniques have advanced the characterization of environmental and human samples including the human milk (HM) bacteriome. However, extraction of high-quality genomic DNA that is representative of the bacterial population in samples is crucial. Lipids removal from HM prior to DNA extraction is common practice, but this may influence the bacterial population detected. The objective of this study was to compare four commercial DNA extraction kits and lipid removal in relation to HM bacterial profiles. Four commercial DNA extraction kits, QIAamp® DNA Microbiome Kit, ZR Fungal/Bacterial DNA MiniPrep™, QIAsymphony DSP DNA Kit and ZymoBIOMICS™ DNA Miniprep Kit, were assessed using milk collected from ten healthy lactating women. The kits were evaluated based on their ability to extract high quantities of pure DNA from HM and how well they extracted DNA from bacterial communities present in a commercial mock microbial community standard spiked into HM. Finally, the kits were evaluated by assessing their extraction repeatability. Bacterial profiles were assessed using Illumina MiSeq sequencing targeting the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. The ZR Fungal/Bacterial DNA MiniPrep™ and ZymoBIOMICS™ DNA Miniprep (Zymo Research Corp., Irvine, CA, USA) kits extracted the highest DNA yields with the best purity. DNA extracted using ZR Fungal/Bacterial DNA MiniPrep™ best represented the bacteria in the mock community spiked into HM. In un-spiked HM samples, DNA extracted using the QIAsymphony DSP DNA kit showed statistically significant differences in taxa prevalence from DNA extracted using ZR Fungal/Bacterial DNA MiniPrep™ and ZymoBIOMICS™ DNA Miniprep kits. The only difference between skim and whole milk is observed in bacterial profiles with differing relative abundances of Enhydrobacter and Acinetobacter. DNA extraction, but not lipids removal, substantially influences bacterial profiles detected in HM samples, emphasizing the need for careful selection of a DNA extraction kit to improve DNA recovery from a range of bacterial taxa.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S rRNA gene sequencing; DNA extraction; bacterial profiles; human milk; skim milk; whole milk

Year:  2020        PMID: 32429170     DOI: 10.3390/mps3020039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Protoc        ISSN: 2409-9279


  7 in total

1.  Protocol of the Snuggle Bug/Acurrucadito Study: a longitudinal study investigating the influences of sleep-wake patterns and gut microbiome development in infancy on rapid weight gain, an early risk factor for obesity.

Authors:  Megan E Petrov; Nana Jiao; Sarada S Panchanathan; Elizabeth Reifsnider; Dean V Coonrod; Li Liu; Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown; Haiwei Gu; Laurie A Davidson; Robert S Chapkin; Corrie M Whisner
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 2.567

2.  Bovine Milk Microbiota: Comparison among Three Different DNA Extraction Protocols To Identify a Better Approach for Bacterial Analysis.

Authors:  Paola Cremonesi; Marco Severgnini; Alicia Romanò; Lorenza Sala; Mario Luini; Bianca Castiglioni
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2021-09-22

3.  Elucidating biofilm diversity on water lily leaves through 16S rRNA amplicon analysis: Comparison of four DNA extraction kits.

Authors:  Kathrin Janssen; Shook Ling Low; Yan Wang; Qi-Yong Mu; Gabriele Bierbaum; Carole T Gee
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 1.936

Review 4.  Metagenomic Sequencing for Microbial DNA in Human Samples: Emerging Technological Advances.

Authors:  Yu Shi; Guoping Wang; Harry Cheuk-Hay Lau; Jun Yu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Comparison of the Effectiveness of Four Commercial DNA Extraction Kits on Fresh and Frozen Human Milk Samples.

Authors:  Cassidy Butler; Amy Matsumoto; Casey Rutherford; Hope K Lima
Journal:  Methods Protoc       Date:  2022-07-19

6.  Contrasting Diversity and Composition of Human Colostrum Microbiota in a Maternal Cohort With Different Ethnic Origins but Shared Physical Geography (Island Scale).

Authors:  Wanying Xie; Huimin Zhang; Yongqing Ni; Yunhua Peng
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 6.064

7.  Evaluation of full-length nanopore 16S sequencing for detection of pathogens in microbial keratitis.

Authors:  Liying Low; Pablo Fuentes-Utrilla; James Hodson; John D O'Neil; Amanda E Rossiter; Ghazala Begum; Kusy Suleiman; Philip I Murray; Graham R Wallace; Nicholas J Loman; Saaeha Rauz
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 2.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.