| Literature DB >> 32429119 |
Baraa Al-Hashimi1, Heshu Sulaiman Rahman2, Khalid Mohammad Omer3.
Abstract
The determination ofEntities:
Keywords: carbon nanodots; cytotoxicity; hydrothermal; inner filter effect; quenching; rifampicin
Year: 2020 PMID: 32429119 PMCID: PMC7287754 DOI: 10.3390/ma13102275
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the hydrothermal preparation of the carbon nanodots (CNDs) and quenching using rifampicin due to the overlap of the rifampicin absorption spectra with the CNDs excitation spectra. PL: Photoluminescence.
Figure 2(A) TEM image, (B) XRD pattern, (C) FTIR spectra, and (D) Raman spectra of the CNDs.
Figure 3High-resolution XPS spectra of the CNDs: (A) survey spectra of CNDs and (B–E) deconvoluted XPS spectra for all elements in the CNDs.
Figure 4(A) Excitation (blue), absorption (black), and emission (red) spectra of the CNDs (inset: digital picture of the CND solution under visible light (left) and ultraviolet light (right)). (B) PL emission of CNDs with various excitation wavelengths.
Figure 5The effect of pH (A), ionic strength (B), temperature (C), and excipients (D) on the fluorescence intensity of the CNDs.
Figure 6Absorption spectra of rifampicin, and the excitation and emission spectra of the CNDs. Rf* stands for rifampicin.
Figure 7(A) Fluorescence spectra of the CNDs with the addition of different concentrations of rifampicin. (B) Graph of F0/F versus the concentration of rifampicin, where F0 is the fluorescence intensity when there was no rifampicin and F is the fluorescence intensity when rifampicin was added. (C) The digital micrograph showing the addition of various concentrations of rifampicin to the CND solutions.
Review of various approaches used for rifampicin assays.
| Material | Method | LOD (μM) | Linearity Range (μM) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nickel nanoparticles | Voltammetric | 2.6 | 5–500 | [ |
| C18 monolithic column | HPLC | 0.2 | 5–200 | [ |
| Peroxomonosulfate-Co (II) | Chemiluminescence | 0.008 | 0.06–1.21 | [ |
| Carbon nanodots | Fluorometry | 0.15 | 0.52–59.5 | [ |
| Carbon nanodots | Fluorometry | 0.06 | 1–100 | This work |
Rifampicin assays and the determination of recovery percentage using CNDs (n = 5).
| Sample No. | Actual Amount (mg) | Measured Amount (mg) | Recovery (%) | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 298.39 | 302.4 | 100.80 | 1.03 |
|
| 297.98 | 302.2 | 100.73 | 0.98 |
|
| 297.88 | 298.8 | 99.60 | 0.18 |
|
| 298.26 | 304.4 | 101.47 | 1.50 |
|
| 298.38 | 300.2 | 100.07 | 0.51 |
Body mass of tested subjects throughout study duration (mean ± SD, n = 5).
| Animal Group | Day 0 | Day 14 | Day 28 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 20.15 ± 1.3 | 25.0 ± 0.8 | 29.8 ± 1.0 |
| Low dose | 20.05 ± 1.2 | 24.15 ± 0.45 | 27.9 ± 1.5 |
| High dose | 20.3 ± 1.5 | 25.45 ± 0.75 | 28.66 ± 0.8 |
Hepatic and renal function parameters of the test subjects (mean ± SD, n = 5).
| Animal Group | ALP (U/L) | ALT (U/L) | AST (U/L) | Urea (mmol/L) | Creatinine (µmol/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 110.5 ± 0.3 | 60.5 ± 1.0 | 145.5 ± 1.3 | 7.9.0 ± 0.5 | 30.5 ± 0.05 |
| Low dose | 111.75 ± 0.5 | 61.63 ± 1.5 | 144.2 ± 0.75 | 8.2 ± 1.2 | 30.1 ± 1.7 |
| High dose | 112.5 ± 0.65 | 61.07 ± 1.2 | 145.8 ± 0.7 | 8.0 ± 1.6 | 30.5 ± 1.9 |
Results of hemogram for test subjects (mean ± SD, n = 5).
| Animal Group | Total RBC (× 1012/L) | Hb (g/L) | PCV (L/L) | PLT (× 105/L) | Total WBC (× 103/µL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 8.3 ± 0.2 | 139 ± 1.3 | 0.39 ± 0.25 | 6.6 ± 0.85 | 2.6 ± 0.1 |
| Low dose | 8.4 ± 1.5 | 141 ± 1.7 | 0.41 ± 0.45 | 6.4 ± 0.33 | 2.55 ± 0.55 |
| High dose | 8.2 ± 0.75 | 142 ± 1.45 | 0.40 ± 0.3 | 6.3 ± 0.11 | 2.45 ± 0.65 |
Figure 8The hepatic tissue (at 400× magnification) of the tested subjects that were administered (A) tap water, (B) low doses of CNDs (10 mg/kg), and (C) high doses of CNDs (50 mg/kg) after 4 weeks. There were no pathological changes in any of the tested groups.
Figure 9The renal tissue (at 400× magnification) of the tested subjects that were administered (A) tap water, (B) low doses of CNDs (10 mg/kg), and (C) high doses of CNDs (50 mg/kg) after 4 weeks. There were no pathological changes in any of the tested groups.