Literature DB >> 32428967

Patients' criteria for choosing a dentist: comparison between a university-based setting and private dental practices.

Ragna Lamprecht1, Julia Struppek1, Guido Heydecke1, Daniel R Reissmann1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most clinical studies in dentistry are conducted in university-based settings. However, whether findings can be generalized to private dental practices is not clear. Aims of this study were to determine patients' criteria for choosing a dentist, and to assess whether criteria differ between patients in university dental clinic and private dental practices.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, a convenience sample of 300 subjects involving dental patients of a university dental clinic and private dental practices, and subjects from general population (each n=100) were included. Criteria for choosing a dentist were assessed with a 31-item questionnaire, covering socio-demographic characteristics, qualifications, psychosocial skills, practice structure, practice offers, and accessibility, with a 6-point ordinal rating scale ranging from "very crucial"-(5) to "not crucial at all"-(0).
RESULTS: A total of 189 subjects (63%) provided completed questionnaires for analyses. Dentists' psychosocial skills (mean 4.4) were rated as most important when choosing a dentist, whereas socio-demographic characteristics were of almost no significance (mean 1.0). Significant differences between settings were observed only for practice offers and accessibility with highest ratings in university setting. However, after controlling for potential confounders, ratings differed only slightly and not statistically significantly.
CONCLUSIONS: Dentists' psychosocial skills appear to be most important criteria for choosing a dentist. Setting-related differences in criteria seem to be likely but obviously result from differences in socio-demographic characteristics. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health-care research; dental care; dental patients; patient evaluation; patient perspective; selection criteria

Year:  2020        PMID: 32428967     DOI: 10.1111/joor.12995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  4 in total

1.  What Counts for the Old and Oldest Old?-An Analysis of Patient Criteria for Choosing a Dentist-Part II: Personal Characteristics and Soft Skills.

Authors:  Ina Nitschke; Thomas Ulbrich; Annett Schrock; Werner Hopfenmüller; Julia Jockusch
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  What Counts for the Old and Oldest Old?-An Analysis of Patient Criteria for Choosing a Dentist-Part I: Awareness and Selection Criteria, Infrastructure, and Dental Office Equipment.

Authors:  Ina Nitschke; Richard von Chlingensperg; Annett Schrock; Werner Hopfenmüller; Julia Jockusch
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Women's HIV disclosure to the dentist: Does frequent contact matter?

Authors:  Carrigan L Parish; Daniel J Feaster; Margaret R Pereyra; Maria L Alcaide; Kathleen M Weber; Mardge H Cohen; Susanna Levin; Deborah Gustafson; Daniel Merenstein; Bradley E Aouizerat; Jessica Donohue; Jennifer Webster-Cyriaque; Gina Wingood; Mirjam-Colette Kempf; Lisa R Metsch
Journal:  J Public Health Dent       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 1.821

Review 4.  Including the patient's oral health perspective in evidence-based decision-making.

Authors:  Danna R Paulson; Swaha Pattanaik; Phonsuda Chanthavisouk; Mike T John
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 1.595

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.