Ilse Eidhof1, Jonathan Baets2,3,4, Erik-Jan Kamsteeg1, Annette Schenck1, Bart P van de Warrenburg5. 1. Department of Human Genetics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behavior, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 2. Center for Molecular Neurology, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium. 3. Institute Born-Bunge, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium. 4. Neuromuscular Reference Centre, Department of Neurology, Antwerp University Hospital, 6520 Antwerp, Belgium. 5. Department of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behavior, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GC Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sir,We read with great interest, the letters from Breza ) and Dong ). Following our recent publication in this journal reporting a new autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia (ARCA) subtype caused by mutations in GDAP2 (Eidhof ), both groups each identified a patient with gene-disruptive mutations in the GDAP2 gene by exome sequencing or after reanalysis of exome data.First of all, these two independent reports are an important confirmation of our finding that bi-allelic GDAP2 mutations cause cerebellar ataxia. Second, although Breza et al. (2020) have not provided further details on the size of the ataxia cohort they screened, the fact that both they and Dong et al. (2020) in their cohort of 60 unsolved ARCA patients, identified only a single patient with mutations in GDAP2 suggests that this is a rare cause of ARCA. This is in line with our impression, as the two independent patients reported by us came from two large ataxia cohorts. Third, although the current number of patients is limited, there is so far a striking homogeneity in terms of phenotype: an adult-onset, slowly progressive cerebellar syndrome manifesting in the fourth decade of life, accompanied by pyramidal features/spasticity, and—in three of the currently four patients—cognitive decline. Whether the observed emotional liability, aggressive behaviour, and depressive episodes in the patient reported by Breza et al. are also linked to GDAP2 remains uncertain at this stage.The homozygous frameshift variant, a 1-bp deletion, identified by Breza et al. (p.Pro45LeufsTer22), is located in exon 2 of the GDAP2 gene and severely affects the GDAP2 open reading frame. The variant damages the Macro domain and leads to complete absence of the CRAL-TRIO domain. Because of the presence of an early premature termination codon located 22 amino acids downstream of the variant, the mutated GDAP2 transcript is likely targeted for nonsense-mediated decay (NMD). Thus, similar to the GDAP2 variants that we described previously, this variant likely leads to loss of GDAP2 protein levels.The biallelic variants (p.Arg253* and p.Thr422fs*7) identified in the patient described by Dong et al. are located in exon 7 and exon 13 of the GDAP2 gene. Both variants were predicted to be targeted for NMD or result in transcripts that encode prematurely terminated GDAP2 proteins that either completely lack or contain a truncated CRAL-TRIO domain. Based on the expression of these variants using copy-DNA constructs, Dong et al. suggested that both p.Arg253* and p.Thr422fs*7 do not result in a loss of, but in truncated GDAP2 proteins. However, there is a design problem with these experiments. NMD is triggered by exon-junction complexes that bind the mRNA during the splicing process (Kervestin and Jacobson, 2012). By using copy-DNA, i.e. DNA without introns, the splicing step is eliminated and hence the utilized approach is not suitable to argue against NMD. It is therefore very likely that GDAP2 levels in the patient with the p.Arg253* and p.Thr422fs*7 variants reported by Dong et al. are strongly decreased, and loss-of-function is underlying the consistent phenotype. Dong et al. suggested that the CRAL-TRIO domain might be a mutational hotspot, and that loss of this domain, either via overall loss of the GDAP2 protein or a truncated GDAP2 protein that lacks a functional CRAL-TRIO domain, can be causative of ARCA. The GDAP2 CRAL-TRIO domain is indeed either directly or indirectly affected in all four cases. Nonetheless, more research will be required to understand the exact pathophysiological mechanisms.Dong et al. hint towards the possibility that truncated GDAP2 mutations are associated with a less severe phenotype in comparison with mutations that lead to loss of GDAP2. However, current data suggest a dynamic phenotype based on disease duration, rather than a genotype-phenotype correlation, and, as stated earlier, compelling evidence for a mechanism involving a truncated GDAP2 protein rather than GDAP2 loss-of-function is missing.It is currently unclear how loss of GDAP2 leads to progressive cerebellar degeneration. We previously showed that ARCA-associated genes have enriched connectivity at the protein level, and are strongly enriched for defective cellular stress responses and DNA repair, to which the cerebellum seems preferentially vulnerable (Eidhof , 2019). Based on its protein domains, GDAP2 connects to other ARCA-associated proteins implicated in cellular stress responses (Warde-Farley ; Eidhof , 2019). Indeed, Gdap2 expression levels in Drosophila respond to cellular stress and induction of cellular stress in DrosophilaGDAP2 models severely reduced lifespan (Eidhof ), supporting the possibility that GDAP2 acts as a metabolic sensor in the cerebellum that is required for an appropriate, effective response to stress. The exact role of GDAP2, however, needs further investigation.Others have given this ARCA subtype caused by GDAP2 mutations the designation ARCA27 or SCAR27. However, we are in favour of using the recently proposed classification system for genetic movement disorders, including ataxia (Rossi ), and would like this entity to be referred to as ATX-GDAP2.In conclusion, Breza et al. and Dong et al. have independently confirmed the causality of GDAP2 mutations in rare, late-onset ARCA. Despite the phenotypic homogeneity suggested so far, additional cases and a longer follow-up time will help us to delineate the full phenotypic GDAP2 spectrum. More research will be required to understand the biological function of GDAP2, the pathophysiological consequences of GDAP2 mutations, and how these contribute to cerebellar degeneration and ataxia.
Data availability
Data availability is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study.
Funding
This research was supported by the E-RARE-3 Joint Transnational Call grant “Preparing therapies for autosomal recessive ataxias” (PREPARE; ZonMW, 9003037604 to A.S. and B.P.vdW.), by a Radboud university medical centre junior researcher grant to B.P.vdW. and A.S., by the Association Belge contre les Maladies Neuromusculaires (ABMM) - Aide à la Recherche ASBL, and the EU FP7/2007-2013 under grant agreement number 2012-305121 (NEUROMICS). J.B. is supported by a Senior Clinical Researcher mandate of the Research Fund - Flanders (FWO). B.P.vdW. is supported by research grants from Radboud university medical centre, ZonMW, Hersenstichting, Gossweiler Foundation, and uniQure.
Authors: David Warde-Farley; Sylva L Donaldson; Ovi Comes; Khalid Zuberi; Rashad Badrawi; Pauline Chao; Max Franz; Chris Grouios; Farzana Kazi; Christian Tannus Lopes; Anson Maitland; Sara Mostafavi; Jason Montojo; Quentin Shao; George Wright; Gary D Bader; Quaid Morris Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Ilse Eidhof; Jonathan Baets; Erik-Jan Kamsteeg; Tine Deconinck; Lisa van Ninhuijs; Jean-Jacques Martin; Rebecca Schüle; Stephan Züchner; Peter De Jonghe; Annette Schenck; Bart P van de Warrenburg Journal: Brain Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 13.501